Houston, We Have a Problem

Sunday, March 23, AD 2014

 

 

You know, I am old enough to recall when NASA was all about space exploration.  Under the current administration it appears that NASA is mostly concerned with supporting the agendas of the Obama Administration.  Case in point, a NASA funded study of epic historical illiteracy:

If we’re to avoid their fate, we’ll need policies to reduce economic inequality and preserve natural resources, according to a NASA-funded study that looked at the collapses of previous societies.

“Two important features seem to appear across societies that have collapsed,” reads the study. “The stretching of resources due to the strain placed on the ecological carrying capacity and the economic stratification of society into Elites and Masses.”

In unequal societies, researchers said, “collapse is difficult to avoid…. Elites grow and consume too much, resulting in a famine among Commoners that eventually causes the collapse of society.”

As limited resources plague the working class, the wealthy, insulated from the problem, “continue consuming unequally” and exacerbate the issue, the study said.

Meanwhile, resources continue to be used up, even by the technologies designed to preserve them. For instance, “an increase in vehicle fuel efficiency technology tends to enable increased per capita vehicle miles driven, heavier cars, and higher average speeds, which then negate the gains from the increased fuel-efficiency,” the study said.

The researchers used what they termed a Human And Nature DYnamical (HANDY) formula to reach their conclusions. The formula uses factors such as birth rates, resources, and income classes to create a mathematical equation to project outcomes.

The study was sponsored by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and headed by the National Science Foundation’s Safa Motesharrei.

For those who think modern society is immune from the problems that brought down ancient civilizations, a “brief overview of collapses demonstrates not only the ubiquity of the phenomenon, but also the extent to which advanced, complex and powerful societies are susceptible to collapse,” the study said.

So how do we save ourselves? “Collapse can be avoided, and population can reach a steady state at the maximum carrying capacity, if the rate of depletion of nature is reduced to a sustainable level, and if resources are distributed equitably,” reads the report.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Continue reading...

17 Responses to Houston, We Have a Problem

  • I liked a comment over at Darwin’s place that said something like (extreme paraphrasing here!):
    All the fallen states were made up of humans. There, found the problem for you. Now can you get back to focusing on your job?

  • Do you mean Arnold Toynbee’s “A Study of History”?

    I cannot find “Outline of History”.

    I am partial to the ‘decline in morality’ theory as to the fall of civilizations.

  • We’re all Rapa Nui now?

  • Pingback: Houston, We Have a Problem - God & Caesar
  • The NASA study really seems like a “study” that had fore-ordained conclusions.
    An interesting part of studying history is the interplay of different social factors and noticing how hard it is to separate cause and effect sometimes. What came first and what was overlapping- moral decline and the military defeat – etc.?

  • Yes Tito, it is A Study of History. I have made the correction. An Outline of History was HG. Well’s two volume study of history. God alone knows how I confused the two when I drafted this post as they are in no way comparable.

    Morality and the collapse of societies rarely have much to do with each other. The spreading of Christianity for example coincided with the Fall of the Roman Empire in the West. Saint Augustine wrote City of God in an attempt to refute the fairly common pagan contention that it was the spreading of Christianity that was causing the weakening of the Empire. Augustine was correct. The two processes had nothing to do with each other.

  • The NASA study missed several important hysterical determinants.

    In addition to class war and global warming, the Assyrian, Babylonian, Egyptian, Persian, Pan-Hellenic, Roman, Byzantine, Spanish, HRE, British, etc. Empires collapsed under the weights of gender, race, and sexual orienation victimizations.

    Let me know if I missed any.

    Anyhow, History shows societies that organize themselves around tiny elites (all-powerful states, bureaucracies, central planners/collectivists, dynasties: Bushes, Clintons) who think they should control the systems suffer a 100% failure rate. Today’s system shares similar fundamentals to nearly every other case of failed empire. And it’s foolish to think that this time will be different

  • “Morality and the collapse of societies rarely have much to do with each other.”
    .
    Immorality begets cowardice and ninnies. Can you see any “gays” formulating the Great Escape? “Gays” would not be in the armed forces who are at war for freedom, truth and Justice.
    .
    The soul of man must have a purpose. Without a purpose, other than self-gratification, there is not a reason for a coward to save another human being much less the founding principles of Freedom, Truth and Justice.

  • “Immorality begets cowardice and ninnies.”

    Ah, if history were only that simple. Great courage and military ability have often gone hand in hand with wretched immorality. For example, few men have been braver than the redcoats who stormed Badajoz in 1812. The crimes they were then guilty of in the sack of the city caused even a hardened campaigner like Wellington to be appalled.

  • I’ve heard very little about Toynbee, except criticism from the kind of people that I aspire to be criticized by.

    Glancing at the NASA report, it’s not a study that concludes that civilizations fall due to inequality and resource depletion; it’s a study of inequality and resource depletion. Those are the terms of the model it uses. If I were, say, an electrical engineer, I could produce a model showing that electrical usage in Beirut and Berlin declined drastically as they fell. Correlation and causation and all that. It seems to me like all civilizations have had a big gap between elites and masses, whether the civilization was booming or in decline. I tend to agree with economist Douglass North, that the determining factor of success is whether the formal and informal institutions (in the broadest possible meaning) of a society reward the creation or redistribution of wealth.

  • “The crimes they were then guilty of in the sack of the city caused even a hardened campaigner like Wellington to be appalled.”
    .
    “The crimes they were then guilty of” came about when they rejected virtue and assumed vice, relying on cowardice to commit their crimes instead of courage to maintain their human dignity.

  • NASA is doing this report because it has been denied the funding to go into space.

  • ““The crimes they were then guilty of” came about when they rejected virtue and assumed vice, relying on cowardice to commit their crimes instead of courage to maintain their human dignity.”

    Actually it was the custom then and had been for millennia that cities that resisted and had to be taken by storm were subject to a sack. Think of Henry V’s warning to Harfleur. The troops were also maddened because the French resisted ferociously and the Brits sustained 4800 casualties. Also consider what segment of the British population the troops in Wellington’s time were recruited from:

    Here is Wellington describing his troops in 1813:

    “A French army is composed very differently from ours. The conscription calls out a share of every class — no matter whether your son or my son — all must march; but our friends — I may say it in this room — are the very scum of the earth. People talk of their enlisting from their fine military feeling — all stuff — no such thing. Some of our men enlist from having got bastard children — some for minor offences — many more for drink; but you can hardly conceive such a set brought together, and it really is wonderful that we should have made them the fine fellows they are.”

    The troops were kept in line through ferocious discipline. When that gave way, as it did after the storming of Badajoz, horror often ensued.

  • Donald, isn’t that true of all troops? In the highest emotions, and ordered to ignore personal safety and the normal restraints of civilized society, soldiers of any era are tempted to act horrifically. Military discipline serves two purposes: prodding the man to be a soldier and restraining him from becoming a thug.

    Much like righteous anger is the most dangerous of virtues, because it prompts the passions.

  • “Donald, isn’t that true of all troops?”

    All troops can get out of hand after they have sustained casualties. This was exacerbated at Badajoz due to the custom of sacking a resisting city and due to the fact that many of the men had a history of law breaking in their civilian lives. Another factor is that among the 4800 casualties the British sustained no doubt there were a fair number of non-coms and officers, leadership often meaning leading from the front and taking greater risks in those days. Thus many of the troops first through the city would have been without their regular leaders. What followed was a complete break down in discipline which lasted for 72 hours. Many officers were shot by their own men while trying to restore order.

  • I think so too Mary – NASA is doing this report for funding-

  • NASA isn’t some innocent organization suddenly gone bad, do some research on the NASA Nazi’s…the roots of NASA and who it comprises.

NASA Administrator Goes Under the Obama Bus

Tuesday, July 13, AD 2010

Hattip to Allahpundit at Hot Air.  Well that didn’t take long.  I have discussed here the disastrous interview that Charles Bolden had with Al Jazeera in which he stated that the foremost policy goal of NASA under the Obama administration was to reach out to Muslim nations and raise their self-esteem as to their contributions regarding science, math and engineering.

“When I became the NASA administrator — or before I became the NASA administrator — he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering.”

My co-blogger Tito had an excellent follow up post here.  Yesterday press flack in chief for the Obama administrator, Robert Gibbs, said flatly that the NASA administrator was wrong about the policy of muslim outreach being NASA’s top priority.

The idea that Bolden misspoke in the interview is risible.  Bolden was saying much the same thing back in February regarding outreach to Muslim countries.  Blaming Bolden for this is a mistake.  This foolish PC policy is clearly a product of the Obama worldview, in which hare-brained political schemes that might sound good at a 3:00 AM liberal campus bull session, lubricated by a lot of beers, have become government policy.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Continue reading...

2 Responses to NASA Administrator Goes Under the Obama Bus

  • Are you sure it was just beer – some of these ideas would seem to require more potent mind altering substances.

  • We already knew brains aren’t required (in fact they’re frowned on) to be a marine.

    here we have proof that one doesn’t need any functional gray matter to become a marine major general.

Obamas Fly Me To The Crescent Moon

Saturday, July 10, AD 2010

Fellow TAC cohort Donald posted an excellent column on President Obama’s attempt at reimagining NASA as a political experiment in Muslim outreach.

My personal opinion is that President Obama could care less about NASA for political reasons.  The biggest one is that he is punishing Texas for voting Republican and many of his political contributors would love to increase their government budgets at the expense of those programs that doesn’t fit in their world view.

How ironic that Texas was the only state in the union that had a net increase in job creation.  Many red states are faring better than the blue states in this economic recession.  Though President Obama and his co-wealth distributionists continue to push for welfare-state programs that increases our national debt and fails to create any jobs in the private sector.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Continue reading...

The Left Stuff

Thursday, July 8, AD 2010

NASA administrator Charles Bolden in an interview with Al Jazeera, tells us all we really need to know about the Obama administration:

“When I became the NASA administrator — or before I became the NASA administrator — he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering.”

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Continue reading...

11 Responses to The Left Stuff

  • NASA is supposed to launch rockets and other craft, study space, and travel above the atmosphere. Its duties, especially at a time of budget restraints, are not to make any one “feel good,”

    The purpose of NASA was to beat the Russians to the Moon. Having achieved that goal, making people feel good is about as accurate a description of its purpose as any other.

  • Acutally BA I believe the purpose of NASA is to lead the way in exploration of space. If that isn’t its purpose it should be shut down and a new agency created to carry out this crucial task.

  • NASA has another purpose. National Defense. Our technological military uses GPS, satelite immagery, targeting devices and a whole hose of stuff we don’t know about yet. Not to mention that we need NASA if we are to develop a missile defense shield. Now that we don’t have the shuttle, we are relying on Russians and Chinese to get us into space. What if they decide not to let us up? What if they decide to put a nuclear launch platform on the space station pointed at us?

    It seems BHO is not only pandering to the Muslims, he seems to be helping them weaken America. He is cooperating with their jihad. Not necessarily as a willing participant, but at least as a negligent accomplice. Either way, that is an abdication of his authority as Commander in Chief.

  • Pingback: "NASA administrator Charles Bolden in an interview with Al Jazeera, tells us all we really need to know about the Obama administration:" and… | www.TheUntoldStories.com
  • Acutally BA I believe the purpose of NASA is to lead the way in exploration of space.

    That may once have been its ostensible purpose (though judging from Gen. Bolden’s statements it may not even be that anymore). But I don’t think this was ever its true purpose.

  • “But I don’t think this was ever its true purpose.”

    Curious as to why. Developing satellite technology in response to Sputnik and beating the Soviets to the moon certainly were part of the Cold War, but just as certainly involved exploration of space, which is precisely what NASA has been, albeit often clumsily, attempting to do throughout its history, at least, apparently, until this current administration.

  • Pingback: NASA administrator Charles Bolden in an interview with Al Jazeera, tells us all we really need… | Skoopio.com
  • But I don’t think this was ever its true purpose.

    We beat the Russians to the moon in 1969. What is your conception of what its ‘true purpose’ has been for 41 of the 52 years it has been in existence?

  • While we are at it, the European Union and a number of foreign countries have erected public agencies similar to NASA. None so far have put astronauts on the moon. What is your conception of the ‘true purpose’ of these agencies?

    the problem is not Bolden but rather the man who appointed him.

    It would not surprise me if B.O. devoted not ten minutes of thought to a memorandum prepared by whomever recommending this appointment ‘ere putting his John Henry on a formal letter of nomination. It is not the man, but the whole social nexus of which he is a part.

  • Pingback: Obamas Fly Me To The Crescent Moon « The American Catholic
  • Pingback: NASA Administrator Goes Under the Obama Bus « The American Catholic