September 13, 1759: Battle of the Plains of Abraham

The Death of General Wolfe by Benjamin West is a painting which has always fascinated me.  Wolfe’s victory at the Plains of Abraham in 1759 sealed the doom of New France and also the doom ultimately of British rule in the 13 colonies.  Freed from the menace of their ancestral enemy, the colonists were also free to rethink the ties that bound them to the British crown.  West’s painting captures a pivotal moment in American history.  Not only is Wolfe dying, but an old order in America, not only for France but also for Great Britain, is mortally stricken.  American independence would have appalled James Wolfe, who had little love for Americans, but it is given to none of us to know the impact of our lives after our deaths.  Wolfe of course had a death of legend, as the great historian of the struggle between New France and the British, Francis Parkman details:

They asked him [Wolfe] if he would have a surgeon; but he shook his head, and answered that all was over with him. His eyes closed with the torpor of approaching death, and those around sustained his fainting form. Yet they could not withhold their gaze from the wild turmoil before them, and the charging ranks of their companions rushing through the line of fire and smoke.

“See how they run.” one of the officers exclaimed, as the French fled in confusion before the leveled bayonets.

“Who run?” demanded Wolfe, opening his eyes like a man aroused from sleep.

“The enemy, sir,” was the reply; “they give way everywhere.”

“Then,” said the dying general, “tell Colonel River, to cut off their retreat from the bridge. Now, God be praised, I die contented,” he murmured; and, turning on his side, he calmly breathed his last breath.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Paterson-Seymour
Michael Paterson-Seymour
Wednesday, September 14, AD 2016 2:32am

I was always rather taken with the story of Wolfe discussing Gray’s Elegy, then recently published during the nigh advance on the Heights of Abraham.

Penguin Fan
Penguin Fan
Wednesday, September 14, AD 2016 4:46am

Typical of the English at that time….find someone else’s colony and harass it or invade it and take it.

IIRC, Quebec was permitted to remain Catholic while it was illegal to be Catholic in the rest of His Majesty’s empire. The book 1775, which my wife bought for a dollar, pointed out that almost all of Europe was antagonized by Great Britain at the time. Thus, there was no shortage of potential American allies, and their religious differences mattered not.
If New England were not permeated with virulent anti Catholics at the time, Quebec might have well joined the Revolution.
Stupid American anti Catholicism gave rise to the San Patricios, the Irish Americans who switched sides in the Mexican American War, but that is a subject for another time.

Tom
Tom
Wednesday, September 14, AD 2016 8:04am

San Patricios– money, sure, plus the fact the WASP officer corps treated the Irish like shit, a good summary here:
https://youtu.be/W7Ldi7cCzHU

Michael Paterson-Seymour
Michael Paterson-Seymour
Wednesday, September 14, AD 2016 11:36am

Donald R McClarey quoted

“The boast of heraldry, the pomp of pow’r,
And all that beauty, all that wealth e’er gave,
Awaits alike th’ inevitable hour:
The paths of glory lead but to the grave.
Bravo!

T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Wednesday, September 14, AD 2016 11:48am

Here is another unsolicited book recommendation: Northern Armageddon – The Battle of the Plains of Abraham by D. Peter MacLeod. It is a full account of the battle/campaign (total war; it would have made Hitler smile) and a good read.

Tom McKenna
Wednesday, September 14, AD 2016 7:48pm

The plurality, likely at least 40% of the San Patricios were Irish; there were also assorted Poles, Germans, and others, but the majority of the group was certainly Catholic.

And rather than give you simply my opinion I’ll let Penn State history prof Amy Greenberg, author of a book on the war I’m reading explain:

While a significant proportion of immigrant soldiers were Catholic, the officers, for the most part, were Protestant, and the army reflected the virulent anti-Catholicism of American society in the 1840’s. Anti-Catholic riots were common events in northeastern cities in the 1830s and 1840s. Just two years before the start of the war, objections to the use of the Catholic Bible in public schools led to a major riot in Philadelphia and a national conversation about the place of Catholicism in America. There were plenty of soldiers who claimed ‘that the present war is favored by the Almighty, because it will be the means of eradicating Papacy, and extending the benefits of Protestantism.’ Catholic immigrants found it difficult to abide by some of the army’s rules. Soldiers of all faiths were advised, or compelled, to attend the Protestant services offered by the army chaplain. They were often banned from attending Catholic mass. Not surprisingly, they had trouble justifying a war waged on fellow Catholics.

Another historian and expert in Irish immigration at U Missouri claims: “The San Patricios were alienated both from American society as well as the US Army. They realized that the army was not fighting a war of liberty, but one of conquest against fellow Catholics such as themselves.”

When these brave men were finally defeated in what US Grant called “a wicked war,” a war Lincoln (who some on this blog hold in very high regard!) thought to be unnecessary and wrong, Colonel William Selby Harney infamously punished thirty captured San Patricios by timing their hanging (including that of Francis O’Connor, who had lost both legs to cannon fire and had to be propped up on the gallows) to coincide with the raising of the American flag over Chapultepec castle following its reduction.

So yes, while, as with all men in all times, mixed motives were present, it does not detract from the essential facts that the US Army was an unfriendly place for new Catholic immigrants in the 1840s in a time when know-nothingism was rampant, especially among the Northeastern WASP establishment that peopled a greater part of the officer corps, and that many of these immigrants who joined up didn’t feel either strongly attached to the US or morally bound to participate in an unjust war against a manifestly innocent, Catholic Mexico.

Tom
Tom
Thursday, September 15, AD 2016 8:01am

Ah, treason, which according to a certain wag who was instrumental in founding our nation, “is a charge invented by winners as an excuse for hanging the losers.” I can imagine circumstances under which fighting for one’s country would be immoral enough to justify committing what would then become the mere legal infraction of “treason.”

Interesting facts: the US violated its own military justice code by hanging the men; death by firing squad was the legal method for the offense of desertion during time of war. The killing of the San Patricios was the largest mass execution in US history, followed by the mass execution a few years later of another unfavored group, the killing of 38 Sioux by order of Lincoln following the Dakota uprising of 1862. While there were over 9,000 desertions during the war, only the San Patricios were punished by hanging.

Sandy O'Seay
Sandy O'Seay
Saturday, September 13, AD 2025 7:16am

Listen to Ian and Sylvia sing “Brave Wolfe,” depicting this battle and his death. A poerful song.

CAM
CAM
Saturday, September 13, AD 2025 10:56pm

Close to the Minnesota River bridge that connected Mankato and N. Mankato was an historical marker that noted the site of the 39 Indians that were hung. That marker is no where to be found these days. Some of my ancestors were in New Ulm when the Lakotas came over the stockade twice. At one point my widowed great great grandfather with his family returned to PA for a few years until it was safe to return to Minnesota. Yet my grandparents, parents and families from Sts Peter and Paul’s Church in Mankato donated to the Lakota missions, especially St. Joseph Indian School in S. Dakota

Scroll to Top