Some of those who saw him in these tragic weeks, when sometimes his eyes filled with tears, emotion which he never showed after the gain or loss of great battles, have written about his inward struggle. But there was no struggle; he never hesitated. The choice was for the state of Virginia. He deplored the choice; he foresaw its consequences with bitter grief; but for himself he had no doubts at the time, nor ever after regret or remorse
Winston Churchill on Robert E. Lee
Hattip to H.W. Crocker III, author of the brilliant history of the Church, Triumph, who has reminded me that today is the birthday of Robert E. Lee Current identity politics based, fueled by Leftist politics and virulent racism, attacks on the memory of Lee will fade as the years roll by, and the greatness of Lee will endure, like the Sun briefly obscured by clouds.
Always outnumbered, with troops often dressed in rags, ill-fed, ill-supplied, he led his men to magnificent victories in the Seven Days, Second Manassas, Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville. Fighting another great general, Grant, he achieved a stalemate in 1864 against an army that had more than a two-to-one advantage, and prolonged the life of his country by almost a year. A fighting general with a propensity for taking huge risks, he was also a humane man with unfailing courtesy for both friend and foe. A true Christian, he did his best, in turbulent times, to live the teachings of Christ.
In regard to the great issues of his day, he was opposed to secession as he indicated in this letter to his son “Rooney” on January 29, 1861: “Secession is nothing but revolution. The framers of our Constitution never exhausted so much labor, wisdom and forbearance in its formation, and surrounded it with so many guards and securities, if it was intended to be broken by every member of the Confederacy at will. It was intended for ‘perpetual union’ so expressed in the preamble, and for the establishment of a government, not a compact, which can only be dissolved by revolution, or the consent of all the people in convention assembled. It is idle to talk of secession.” When Virginia seceded however, he decided that he had no choice but to fight in her defense.
As to slavery,  before the Civil War Lee condemned it in private correspondence, viewing it as an unmitigated evil. While not an abolitionist he hoped that Christianity and education would eventually end slavery.
Pursuant to the terms of his father-in-law’s tangled pro se will, he manumitted his father-in-law’s slaves.
For years prior to the Civil War, Lee and his wife financially supported black families in Liberia, part of their efforts to encourage freeing slaves to participate in setting up a free black state in Liberia. Lee and his wife led by example, freeing their slaves and offering to pay the expenses of all of his former slaves who wished to settle in Liberia.
Lee was in favor of enlisting blacks in the Confederate army from the moment that it was proposed in 1864, and stated that in simple fairness the black soldiers should be guaranteed freedom for themselves and their families. His thoughts on black troops are set forth in these letters. I have little doubt that if it had been in his power Lee would have used black troops from the beginning of the war with freedom being their reward for volunteering to fight.
After the war Lee stated that rather than fighting for slavery he rejoiced that the outcome of the war had ended slavery. That this was no idle comment was demonstrated by Lee while at Church one Sunday morning soon after the war.
Lee after the Civil War opposed immediate suffrage for former slaves, but only on the ground that they currently lacked the education to exercise the franchise responsibly. He led a successful campaign to remedy this by championing the public funding of schools for blacks in 1869-70. He repeatedly expelled white students from Washington University, of which he was President after the war, who engaged in attacks on blacks.
In the midst of defeat Lee gave a great gift to all Americans. By not starting a guerrilla war against the occupying Union troops Lee ensured that the Civil War was not merely the prelude to an endless cycle of wars between the states. In devoting his remaining years to education in a defeated and devastated South he was a shining example to the veterans who followed him of dignity and courage in the face of adversity. There have been greater generals than Robert E. Lee, there have been few greater men.
“The man was loved, the man was idolized,
The man had every just and noble gift.
He took great burdens and he bore them well,
Believed in God but did not preach too much,
Believed and followed duty first and last
With marvellous consistency and force,
Was a great victor, in defeat as great,
No more, no less, always himself in both,
Could make men die for him but saved his men
Whenever he could save them was most kind
But was not disobeyed was a good father,
A loving husband, a considerate friend. “
Stephen Vincent Benet
“He was a foe without hate; a friend without treachery; a soldier without cruelty; a victor without oppression, and a victim without murmuring. He was a public officer without vices; a private citizen without wrong; a neighbor without reproach; a Christian without hypocrisy, and a man without guile. He was a Caesar, without his ambition; Frederick, without his tyranny; Napoleon, without his selfishness, and Washington, without his reward.” – Benjamin Harvey Hill – address before the Southern Historical Society in Atlanta, Georgia on 18 February 1874
The administrative state conveniently “lost” the amnesty oath of one of the most famous men in America?
Tell me again about the benign bureaucracy…
A reader asked if they could respond to this post privately. That is not something I usually encourage due to time constraints. I am still actively engaged in the law mines and the time I spend on the blog usually occurs very late at night or very early in the morning before dawn. The blog has become fairly popular and if I started to allow private messages to me in regard to blog matters, I fear I would be overwhelmed and not give the private messages the attention and responses they warrant.
Now what I could do is omit the name of any response and publish it as a post with a response by me. That would keep the blog business in the blog.
We had a feet ballistic missile nuclear submarine named after this great man:
USS Robert E Lee SSBN-601
https://www.navysite.de/ssbn/ssbn601.htm
She’s been long sense turned into razor blades and her reactor compartment is entombed at Hanford, Washington. I never got to serve aboard her. The Ohio class Trident submarines with their bigger missiles and bigger reactors made her obsolete. 😞
[…] Civ Defender: 227 Years of Robert E. Lee – Donald R. McClarey, Esq., at The American Catholic . . .Comment on 227 Years of Robert E. […]
Allen Guelzo’s excellent bio of Lee (2021) makes a very strong case that Lee was indeed a traitor, as that term is both popularly and legally understood.
Guelzo is no lawyer. Lee and all other Confederates had renounced their allegiance to the US and formed a new polity, the Confederate States of America. They were not citizens of the US and lacked the mens rea to be traitors. This was demonstrated by the facts that there were no treason trials after the Civil War and that former Confederates, before the restoration of their civil rights, had to take an oath of allegiance to the US.
Guelzo’s bio of Lee does not lack merit, but he misses the essence of the man completely in his attempted prosecutor’s brief.
People posting here seem to forget the man was an enslaver, for starters, so obviously he was no great humanitarian. Likewise, carving a new country out of an existing one is absolutely treasonous. He was even barred from running for office under the 14th amendment for insurrection. Why anyone (other than a rabid racist who hates American ideals of equality) would want to rehabilitate this man is beyond me.
As I remember, Pres Johnson, and some radical Republicans, seriously considered trying Lee for treason; only Gen Grant’s threat to resign from office prevented it (Grant took the view that it violated the spirit of the Appomattox surrender convention.)
Grant stopped that legal madness in its inception. Johnson would go on to pardon all Confederates on December 25, 1868.
USS Robert E Lee SSBN-601. The following web site gives a short biography of General Lee, then a history of the fleet ballistic missile nuclear submarine named after him. Requiescat in pace.
https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/r/robert-e-lee-ssbn-601.html
Oh crap, I posted that before. Sorry, Donald.
It is very easy to throw about ideas of treason and ignominy concerning an age of whose air we have not breathed. History is constantly “reimagining” the past. In my experience, history is best known by those who have loved it or time adjacent to it.
Treason relies on a common understanding of fidelity. Understanding if another age’s common understanding is exceedingly difficult to achieve. Lee’s father’s generation saw a collection of colonies reorganized as a loose confederation of states and then a tighter union of states. We, on the other hand, live exclusively among people who have only ever known the United States as a single unified whole where citizens frequently change which individual states they are citizens of.
In Connie Willis’s “Doomsday Book,” the protagonist diligently trains in Middle English before travelling to the 1300s only to find that she is nearly incomprehensible to the locals there, despite the training of the best experts. When studying the pat, much more deference must be shown to native speakers of that now inaccessible country.
It was worth saying twice LQC.
If we lose the idea of the noble foe, of the good man caught up in the tragedy of history and ending on the wrong side, we risk becoming arrogant prigs and obnoxious scolds. Generals aren’t the only ones who fight the last war. Our recent (1941-45) war against genuine totalitarian monsters seems to have convinced some amateur historians that all our enemies are such, which is absurd. Robert E. Lee was not Hitler. Stop treating him and the Confederacy as such.
Rather than write a defense of , General
Lee, for whom none should be needed, I make the following observation. Is there not something inherently wrong in that many of his detractors (not all) think nothing of the fact that we lived in a society that, until recently, gave a mother the legal right to murder her unborn child (some states still condone this barbaric practice). A disproportionate number of these homicide victims have been black. In the arguments of the most rabid proponent of slavery (which Lee personally opposed).one would have been hard pressed to find an advocate of child murder irrespective of the race of the victim.