The fools are so proud of their theft of a presidential election that they cannot help boasting about it and seizing what “credit” they can for it. “They” are the puppet-masters of the Puppet-Masters’ Administration. They will get more bold in their acknowledgement of the theft as time passes. They want to wipe the noses of the American people in it continually and convince us that our Republic is gone and there is nothing we can do about it. I will be damned in time and eternity before I will go along with this game plan. A million better men than me have died for this country and I do not intend to let their sacrifices be in vain. I will use every legal means at my disposal to fight the Puppet-Masters so long as I draw breath, so help me God. This isn’t about Trump. It was never about Trump. It has always been about the fate of our nation.
God bless you for your resolve, Don. I see way too many people ready to throw in the towel without ever climbing into the ring. We can’t do that.
Amen.
AMAC’s Man of the Year for 2020 = Donald John Trump.
14 June is National Donald John Trump Day.
4 Jan 20211, Instapundit, Sarah Hoyt: We Know Biden Didn’t Win: Immediately after the election, data maven Matthew Braynard began to determine how many fake ballots were cast in the disputed states. He now says he has absolute proof that Biden’s victory in Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin came through election fraud.
1) We remember the impossible numbers in the middle of the night (those of us who were awake.)
2) Even if we didn’t, the courts’ refusal to let anyone present a case often on bizarre, spurious “standing” grounds, would be a red flag.
3) The democrats trying to shut up anyone who even mentions fraud is as good as an admission of guilt. What the innocent do, like say the Republicans after 2016, is make sure the opposition gets all possible opportunities to show what they think is evidence.
4) The military-occupied capital is totally what people who didn’t steal the election would do.
Chinese Joe Didn’t Win.
We Were Robbed.
We Know What They Did Last November.
“A million better men than me have died for this country….” And will continue to do so. That reality humbles me every day. God truly shed his grace on this land. Consequently, we just all need to go down swinging. I’m glad to know I will have company.
I wonder if all of the expenditures by the organizations and people identified in the Time article were properly disclosed per FEC rules. It seems that statements by the media for or against a candidate that aren’t strictly news reporting could be considered an “independent expenditure” and require reporting per 52 USC § 30104(c). Not to mention the content labeling against claims that fraud occurred in certain elections.
It’s depressing, though not terribly surprising, how many people insist that there is nothing objectionable about the Time article because they say it was bipartisan and for our own benefit (though, as Viva Frei notes, you barely have to read between the lines to see that this wasn’t true.)
This is what full control of the news, media and education industries gives you. The dream of Prussian education has been realized. Swaths of people whose whole goal in life is to follow whatever they are told by the besserwissers.
hubris is the downfall of the arrogant.
I agree with Charlie Kirk’s assessment: they know they can’t erase all the evidence of their fraud and manipulation, so they’re getting in front of the story with their narrative of “fortifying” the election.
As Charlie Kirk pointed out, only people truly confident of their control of the media would put this out. So far, their confidence in their untouchability seems well-founded.
It’s easier to understand why they gloat about this when you realize the level of contempt they have for us.
And on that note, here are some official ads from the Oregon government mocking the inconvenience their orders are causing the plebians:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8i386j2vbI
To believe this election was “stolen” one would have to believe that the ardent Trump-wing Republican Governor and Secretary of State of Georgia were in on the fraud, as were the Trump-wing Republican Governor of Arizona, all three Trump appointed Supreme Court justices and three other Republican appointed justices as well as 60+ lower court judges (many appointed by Trump himself). Several courts (including those in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, enough to swing the election) threw cases out not for standing but because of a lack of any evidence that could be taken even remotely seriously. All of those who claim to have “found” evidence should come forward with the evidence, publicize it and see how well it stands up to scrutiny. My guess? It’s the same smoke-and-mirrors, completely bogus nonsense that so many Republican elected officials and Republican appointed judges have themselves found to be a complete joke.
How much do you get paid to repeat the same talking points even after they have been addressed?
to believe this election was “stolen” one would have to believe that the ardent Trump-wing Republican Governor and Secretary of State of Georgia were in on the fraud
Which of course both were due to their involvement with Dominion Voting Products. The Secretary of State signed the Georgia contract with them in 2019. He said at the time that all ballots cast as a result would be digitally published. Did not happen. He fought tooth and nail against an independent review of signatures.
as were the Trump-wing Republican Governor of Arizona
Actually the GOP controlled legislature in Arizona is still fighting for access to the ballots and is involved in a legal clash with Maricopa County against such access:
https://ktar.com/story/3981997/maricopa-county-asks-court-to-quash-senate-subpoena-for-ballot-access/
If people have nothing to hide they do not behave as if they have everything in the world to hide.
all three Trump appointed Supreme Court justices
Challenging the election results in the Supreme Court was always a long shot as the Court has a long history of attempting to steer clear of election contests. Their involvement in Bush v. Gore in 2000 was reluctant and tardy, and was only done because the Florida Supreme Court kept altering election laws after the election to favor Gore. Expecting the Supreme Court to intervene in several states was simply a bridge too far, except, perhaps, for Alito and Thomas.
The Time article is merely the tip of an iceberg. By the end of the year the election thieves, a good many of them, will be openly boasting of the theft.
Mr. McClarey–In your reply to John you did not address the matter of 60+ judges (trial and appellate, Democrat and Republican, some Trump-appointed) failing to find fraud in any case. It is true that the Trump lawyers (Giuliani et al.) were grossly incompetent; but that is not enough of an explanation.
Most of the cases were dismissed on standing or other procedural dodges to avoid ruling on the merits. On those actually considered on the merits, Trump won the majority:
The claim often repeated by the mainstream media, social-media content moderators, and fact-checkers that lawsuits filed by President Donald Trump’s campaign and Republicans were universally dismissed by the courts is untrue, according to a new analysis.
The findings do not necessarily suggest that if the lawsuits had all been decided before Joe Biden was certified as the official winner of the presidential election by Congress on Jan. 7 that former President Trump would have won the hotly contested election.
Nor would they necessarily have affected many of the Electoral College votes won by Biden in the disputed battleground states. Some of the legal victories took place in states like Colorado and Iowa where the popular vote counts for the respective winners of those states –Biden in Colorado and Trump in Iowa— were not close.
Of the 22 cases that have been heard by the courts and decided on their merits, Trump and Republicans have prevailed in 15, according to citizen journalist John Droz Jr., a physicist and environmental advocate in Morehead City, N.C.
This means Trump has won two-thirds of the cases fully adjudicated by the courts.
Droz and a team of volunteers dug through court filings and legal minutiae to track down 81 lawsuits that were filed in connection with the Nov. 3, 2020 presidential election. The lawsuits were tracked on Droz’s publicly available spreadsheet that was current as of Feb. 6.
Of the 81 cases, 11 were withdrawn or consolidated and 23 were dismissed for lack of standing or on other grounds. Both the cohort of 11 and of 23 should not be considered “wins or losses for either side,” Droz says, because they “have nothing to do with the merits of the case.”
This leaves 47 cases. Of those 47, 22 have been finalized after the court heard arguments, considered evidence, and then issued a ruling.
Of those 22, Trump or Republicans won 15 and lost 7, according to the analysis.
This leaves 25 lawsuits that have yet to be finally disposed of.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/trump-won-two-thirds-of-election-lawsuits-where-merits-considered_3688543.html
Once the Supreme Court refused to take up the Texas case, that was a signal heard loud and clear that the Judicial Branch was sitting this one out. In a case in Arizona the Democrat expert found that eleven percent of the signatures on the absentee ballot sample allowed to be viewed by the court were not valid. Extrapolated across the nation, and problems with signatures alone would probably have been enough to reverse the election results.
John and Bob,
Hail To The Thief!
Which one of them 60 judges looked at one page of the tons of evidence of massive vote fraud.
The thieves think hiding behind walls and 35,000 NG Hessians, they can force 73 million real Americans to submit to tyranny.
The democrat party is a huge criminal enterprise.
If, the brazen Dems had not stolen the elections, they would have facilitated audits/investigations, not fought to cover up their crimes.
Without massive mail-in vote fraud, your Chinese candidate could not have overcome President Trump’s huge leads at 1 AM the morning after Election Day.
Chinese Joe Didn’t win.
We Were Robbed.
We Know What They Did Last November.
Mr. McClarey–In your reply to John you did not address the matter of 60+ judges (trial and appellate, Democrat and Republican, some Trump-appointed) failing to find fraud in any case.
Amazing, they didn’t find what they didn’t look for.
Funny now neither of these jokers will respond when it’s pointed out that those who even faintly resisted the “nothing to see here” push, with the most basic of things like “sure, let’s do a quick audit,” were threatened.
In some cases, on live video, their children who were at school at that moment were publicly threatened.
Gosh.
Why on earth would folks refuse to get involved…..
And just ran into this:
http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm
Based on conduct, some of the Trump appointed judges look more like Mitch McConnell judges. Republican appointed judges have a bad tendency to go wobbly when put to the test. The Republican judicial selection process does not instill confidence. Throwing fights is SOP for the Republican party.
*
The Bernie supporter in the second video must not have been paying attention during the last four years. The swamp did everything in its power to rid itself of Trump and his voters. Trump was the only one who gave the working class a place at the table and was willing to look out for their interests in things like trade agreements. The thing that seems to get missed in the discussion about capitalism, socialism, and communism is the factor of the concentration of power. When power gets sufficiently concentrated the lines between crony capitalism, socialism, and communism start to blur. They all have their own politburos.
Based on conduct, some of the Trump appointed judges look more like Mitch McConnell judges.
The norm is for judges to be skittish about doing much of anything in election cases. What got the US Supreme Court to intervene in Bush v. Gore was the naked partisanship of the Democrat dominated Florida Supreme Court.
What got the US Supreme Court to intervene in Bush v. Gore was the naked partisanship of the Democrat dominated Florida Supreme Court.
Six of the seven members of that court were appointed by Democrats. Three of the seven justices on the court remarked on the conduct of the other four, which included disregarding explicit language in the Florida statutes. The four judges in question repeatedly disrupted the efforts of trial judges attempting to do their jobs.
What’s amusing is that partisan Democrats are still steamed about Bush v. Gore. They’re conception of fair procedures is that they get what they want. They’re steamed about Citizens United. In their mind, the only corporate bodies permitted to participate in the public square are those which provide in-kind contributions to the Democratic Party. They’re steamed about Heller. In their mind, ‘the right of the people’, a phrase used in every other context to refer to a personal right, means something else when it’s a right they do not favor.
Side note: Democrat election manipulation goes back to 1800 and the Jefferson/Adams/Burr controversy. It has been present in numerous elections since, the most notable and apparent when Mayor Daly of Chicago stole 1960 election for Kennedy. It is simply in their DNA and will be with us for as long as we have elections. The one time Republicans tried a perfectly legal maneuver to offset the Klan terrorism of Black voters in 1876 it came back to bite them. They were successful in getting Hays elected but he lost his bid for re-election four years later and ended 20 years of Republicans in the White House.
the most notable and apparent when Mayor Daly of Chicago stole 1960 election for Kennedy.
Once more with feeling. Illinois’ electoral votes were not sufficient to swing the election to Kennedy. If there was consequential fraud, it had to have included Texas and / or Missouri. They’d have had to steal 10,000 votes in Missouri or 46,000 in Texas at a time when postal ballots were generally limited to servicemen. Note, paper trails were sufficient in Texas that Robert Caro could prove 30 years after the fact that Lyndon Johnson’s staff had stolen a crucial primary election in 1948. He was able to identify the county, the precinct, and the very ballot box which was stuffed.