PopeWatch: Say the Black, Do the Red !

Father Z for years has been preaching that priests have to be careful to use the proper forms regarding the Mass and other Sacraments and now we seewhy:

 

How many times over the years have I written on this blog about priests who fool around with the forms of sacrament, the necessary words to be pronounced?

How many?   A lot.

Very few things disturb people more than not being sure about the validity of a sacrament, be it Baptism, Penance or Eucharist.   I’ve dealt with literally hundreds of questions over the years via email about questionable forms being use, which really upsets people and fills them sometimes with fear.

Is my child really baptized?  Was I really absolved?  Was that really a Host he gave me?  Was Mass really said for my loved one?

FATHERS! Stop being JACKASSES and do it right!

Today the Archdiocese of Detroit made public a letter describing a terrible scenario.  In the wake of the decision of the CDF about the INVALIDITY of the form of baptism in the plural (“We baptize you…”), a priest reviewed a video of his baptism and found that he was not validly baptized.    That means that he wasn’t confirmed or ordained!  That means that all the Masses and absolutions he had given were null.   He had to be baptized, absolutely not conditionally, and then confirmed and ordained to diaconate and priesthood, absolutely.

How important is it NOT to screw around with the forms of sacraments?

Hrumpf.

Go here to read the rest.  Much evil would be eliminated in this vale of tears if people would just concentrate on doing their jobs properly.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Dowd
Michael Dowd
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 3:51am

More evidence of the catastrophe of Vatican II. Vatican II must be abrogated in its entirety in order to reform the Catholic Church.

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 7:07am

St. Boniface was complaining about priests messing with the formulary long before Vatican II.

Foxfier
Admin
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 7:36am

While we can trust in God to fix the problems– that doesn’t mean keep making more problems!

Foxfier
Admin
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 7:39am

If anybody is … in a bad mental place from this, one of his commenters covers the relevant point:
https://wdtprs.com/2020/08/jackass-priests-who-screw-around-with-the-forms-essential-words-of-sacraments-wherein-fr-z-rants/#comment-614999

Like I said, God can take care of it, but what an incredible wrong to MAKE more uncertainty when administering a gift designed to fight that very problem!

Pinky
Pinky
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 8:39am

Does anyone know what the difference is between a regular baptism and a conditional one?

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 8:46am

A conditional baptism is a second baptism performed when there is good reason to doubt the validity of the first baptism.

Foxfier
Admin
Reply to  Pinky
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 9:26am

nods
Conditional baptism= “just in case, God, no offense, but we’re baptizing him again because we’re not sure about the first one.”

Which would fix a situation where the first one was invalid, but nobody knew it yet.

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Wednesday, August 26, AD 2020 10:02am

Or a situation where there’s no record, or a situation where the parents of the infant were spirit-seeking hippies who can’t remember what “Brother Tim” of the Good Time Good Fellowship of the Brothers and Sisters of Cosmic Peace Disciples said, but are sure copious amounts of pharmaceuticals were ingested beforehand.

Scroll to Top