5

Three Cheers for the Lex Talionis

23 And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.

Genesis 4: 23-24

 

Dennis Prager reminds us that, in the words of Bernard of Chartres, we are pygmies standing on the shoulders of giants.

 

 

 

 

 

As Saint Augustine noted, the Lex Talionis did not foster vengeance but served to check it.  This was a giant step away from blood feuds that could decimate families and entire communities.  Christ admonished that we pray for our enemies and turn the other cheek, but also acknowledged the punishment of evildoers by the State.  The idea of the Law standing in for private vengeance is an initial huge step for any civilization, and it is unsurprising that where States have gone to war against Christianity, the law swiftly becomes merely a tool to punish enemies of the State.

After Lenin toppled the Kerensky government in 1917, the Bolsheviks were briefly in coalition with other left wing parties, and Isaac Steinberg, an Anarchist, was Commissar of Justice.  When he protested the summary executions ordered by Lenin, Lenin waved off his objections that these were unjust:

He resented my opposition in the name of revolutionary justice.  So I called out in exasperation:  “Then why do we bother with a Commissariat of Justice?  Let’s call it frankly the Commissariat for Social Extermination and be done with it.”  Lenin’s face suddenly brightened and he replied, “Well put…that’s exactly what it should be…but we can’t say that.”

 

Share With Friends
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share

Donald R. McClarey

Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three and happily married for 35 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.

5 Comments

  1. This is brilliant.This is brilliant.This is brilliant.
    This annihilates Gandhi’s “An eye for an eye would make the whole world blind” nonsense.
    Article III, section 3:
    The Congress shall have the Power to declare the Punishment for Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the life of the Person attainted.”
    Every person pays for his own crime.

  2. “So I called out in exasperation: “Then why do we bother with a Commissariat of Justice? Let’s call it frankly the Commissariat for Social Extermination and be done with it.” Lenin’s face suddenly brightened and he replied, “Well put…that’s exactly what it should be…but we can’t say that.”
    Lies and more lies

  3. Ghandi had a lot of quips that were superficially clever, but when you think about them they stop working.

    Humans are actually rational creatures, even if they don’t always work with the same facts or assumptions. If behavior won’t change, then the logical thing to do is to completely wipe out whatever tribe is a threat to you, even if it’s a relatively minor threat.
    In contrast, if people can change behavior, eye-for-an-eye means that the person who does the harming is facing personal and proportional retribution– while there is still some motive to kill the harmed one, to try to prevent discovery, there is that hesitation because “I am risking ____” that can save lives.

    Much, much healthier for society.

  4. “Ghandi had a lot of quips that were superficially clever, but when you think about them they stop working.”

    Ghandi tended to be glib rather than wise. His response to the query as to what he thought about Western Civlization, “I think that would be a very good idea!” was typical.

Comments are closed.