We have made men proud of most vices, but not of cowardice. Whenever we have almost succeeded in doing so, the Enemy permits a war or an earthquake or some other calamity, and at once courage becomes so obviously lovely and important even in human eyes that all our work is undone, and there is still at least one vice of which they feel genuine shame. The danger of inducing cowardice in our patients, therefore, is lest we produce real self-knowledge and self-loathing with consequent repentance and humility. And in fact, in the last war, thousands of humans, by discovering their own cowardice, discovered the whole moral world for the first time. In peace we can make many of them ignore good and evil entirely; in danger, the issue is forced upon them in a guise to which even we cannot blind them. There is here a cruel dilemma before us. If we promoted justice and charity among men, we should be playing directly into the Enemy’s hands; but if we guide them to the opposite behaviour, this sooner or later produces (for He permits it to produce) a war or a revolution, and the undisguisable issue of cowardice or courage awakes thousands of men from moral stupor.
CS Lewis, The Screwtape Letters
Such was the demonic genius of the covid response: they made people proud of their cowardice.
MikeS
There wasn’t one once of cowardice for healthcare workers to take the jab in the hope that we would not infect the elderly we dearly love. Making that decision had nothing to do with fear of my wellbeing, but the possible demise of those we serve.
I just wanted you to know that.
Hind sight is always 20/20.
Philip,
I think Mike referenced a different kind of cowardice. Much of the idiocy we endured for Covid related more to fears of being prosecuted or sued than to an actual risk. As time wore on and virus effects became more apparent, … we still had people demanding we behave like an anthrax attack had occurred.
Thank you JF.
Understood.