Stop the Abortion Mandate

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RD7hJhwy5g&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo%2Egoogle%2Ecom%2Fvideosearch%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dleague%2520of%2520american%2520voters%2520dick%2520morris%26um%3D1%26ie%3DUTF%2D8%26sa%3DN%26tab%3Dwv&feature=player_embedded#t=116]

Lest anyone be confused on this point, ObamaCare means abortion is fully covered.

“Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA) and Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) jointly introduced an amendment that would specifically prohibit federal funds from being used to cover abortion services. The Pitts-Stupak amendment failed. Rep. Pitts also offered an amendment to block any government requirement on health insurance networks to include abortion. Although this second Pitts amendment initially passed, it was reconsidered and it failed on the second Committee vote. Based on the passage of the Capps amendment and failure of the Pitts and Stupak amendments, taxpayers would end up financing abortion.”

Most Democrats in the House and in the Senate will never vote for ObamaCare if abortion is not fully convered.  If it becomes a reality, abortion will be covered just as much as any other “surgical procedure”.  None of this should of course come as a surprise to any sentient pro-lifer.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCifpbfQlOM]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
rdean
rdean
Thursday, August 20, AD 2009 10:55am

Most Democrats would never vote for a bill that didn’t cover abortion? Why not?
The truth is that no one is FOR abortion. Just a woman’s right to decide.
Republicans want to cover Viagra because they feel “erectile dysfunction” is a “medical condition”. If Democrats can’t cover abortion, then Republicans shouldn’t be allowed to cover Viagra.

Phillip
Phillip
Thursday, August 20, AD 2009 11:30am

Erectile dysfunction is a disorder that is corrected by medication. Pregnancy is a natural condition whose end is a live, human infant. The equating of the two shows in part why you, and Democrats in general, don’t understand the issue.

DarwinCatholic
Reply to  Phillip
Thursday, August 20, AD 2009 11:36am

Though I will say, at a pragmatic trade off level, I’d be willing to see people with erectile disfunction have to pay for medication out of pocket, if the trade off would result in a total ban on any funding for abortions — not because I’d see them as the same thing, but because I’d see them as of much different levels of importance. I just don’t think that that party of NOW and NARL has any interest in making the trade.

Phillip
Phillip
Thursday, August 20, AD 2009 11:46am

I wouldn’t disagree with that. I don’t think everything can or should be covered. The illustration for rdean is that given medication for erectile dysfunction is a form of health care. Directly terminating a pregnancy is a form of murder. Two very different things.

Gabriel Austin
Gabriel Austin
Thursday, August 20, AD 2009 12:37pm

Perhaps I am getting senile, but I do remember Senator Boxer asking [some years ago, of course] “Since when is pregnancy a disease.”.

Scroll to Top