Henry Kissinger: “It was a grave mistake to let in so many people of totally different culture and religion and concepts” pic.twitter.com/CulDSiQDxq
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 12, 2023
Now You Tell Us Henry!
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
Congratulations, Secretary Kissinger, you’re the winner of the “No Schitt Sherlock!” Award!
Maybe rejoice that he at last gets it? Great for him, but we are left to deal with the havoc he and his cohorts created on their watch.
I believe he also affirmed the wetness of water during that interview.
In Canada, Britain, France, Germany, and Scandinavia. Hasn’t proved a problem in the United States as yet. We have different problems. And pretty much all occidental countries have deficient fertility. Same in spades with the affluent countries of the Orient.
Maybe rejoice that he at last gets it? Great for him, but we are left to deal with the havoc he and his cohorts created on their watch.
==
What did Dr. Kissinger ever have to do with immigration policy in the United States, much less Britain?
Art:
My limited experience from the perspective of the San Francisco Bay Area suggests that American Muslims are better educated and assimilated than those in Europe. We have no “no-go” zones or what I call “grump clumps”, where unemployed and unassimilated young Muslim men growl and scowl together, blaming the world as shiftless young men always do. We seem to have garnered (so far) the entrepreneurs and mercantile class who are always more readily assimilated than those without skills or ambitions.
There is also intermarriage. About 30 years ago I recall showing a colleague (who was married to a Muslim man of Pakistani origin) a French survey suggested that 90% of the Muslim women who were emigrating from North Africa at the time were marrying non-Muslims. She responded; “You’re surprised?” Can’t think it’s too different here.
[…] Gaza Planned Parenthood Hit by IDF – Donald R. McClarey, Esq., at The American Catholic Kissinger: Big Mistake Europe Took In Immigrants All These Years – The American Catholic Israel Releases Images of Onfants Murdered by Hamas NSFW – The […]
We have to vote in a referendum today which asked us whether Aboriginal (indigenous) representation in parliament should be enshrined in the Australian constitution. I voted NO.
But what I noticed during the campaigning for this referendum was that the majority of the people who went door knocking for the YES side were of the senior age bracket. There were a few seniors at the polling booths with YES shirts “explaining” why we had to vote YES. I avoided them because I don’t appreciate being lectured about something I have already made my mind up about.
It got me thinking that age and experience does not always bring wisdom. In my mind, it appears that these sort of folk have this emotional guilt reaction for being “white” folk. They have lived their life and now are giving the proverbial finger to the younger folks and to future generations. Senior liberals are the worst.
So, in reference to Kissinger, it’s mildly insulting for him to do an interview like this, where knows full well that there is nothing which can reverse the far-reaching damage his policies have created. Better if he had kept quiet, or either done something which might have “fixed” the impact of his poor decisions. And it would have been better if he had some youth on his side when his light bulb went off.
Ezabelle said: “So, in reference to Kissinger, it’s mildly insulting for him to do an interview like this, where knows full well that there is nothing which can reverse the far-reaching damage his policies have created.”
What policies are those? To my knowledge Kissinger had little if anything to do with European (or American, for that matter) open border policy.
@CAG- China for one. I didn’t say he had anything to do with European immigration policy.
China for one. I didn’t say he had anything to do with European immigration policy.
==
Again, the discussion was of immigration policy, which was never Kissinger’s book of business.
Kissinger held three positions over the years, one in the President’s office (from 1969 to 1975), one in charge of the Foreign Service (from 1973-77), and one in charge of a blue ribbon panel (1982-84). He spent a total of nine years and change as a federal official, the last leg of it solely concerned with foreign policy in Central America. His China initiative (1970-77) was concerned with formal diplomatic and consular relations. Troublesome developments in regard to trade relations entirely post-dated his time in office. As for trade policy generally, he made clear in his memoirs that he left that to the Department of Commerce. There is a special representative for trade negotiations. That person works not at the Department of State but in the President’s office, and never reported to Kissinger.
Ezabelle said: “China for one. I didn’t say he had anything to do with European immigration policy.”
Why does Kissinger’s diplomatic policy toward China 50 years ago make you feel “insulted” by his legitimate observations on Europe’s open border policy today?
CAG- you are looking for a fight in your typical form. Go re-read my comment. A 100 year old former US Secretary of State commenting on European immigration policy is- is he going to fix European Immigration policy?! For someone who does not have a good track record of long-term diplomatic international solutions commenting on “European” immigration policy is a bit rich. His Diplomatic policy with China- !with Mao himself! led to China’s rise in power. The Chinese are still celebrating.
https://chinaworker.info/en/2021/07/30/30222/
If China doesn’t affect you personally, then good for you CAG. Kissinger has always been a hypocrite. And at 100, he is still a hypocrite.
Ezabelle said: “CAG- you are looking for a fight in your typical form.”
No, I was just trying to understand where you were coming from. My bad for thinking you had an actual point to make.
No, I was just trying to understand where you were coming from. My bad for thinking you had an actual point to make.
I made my point. You are pretending you don’t understand it. Your last sentence shows you are looking for a fight. Hence why I try and avoid interacting with you.