Especially when the illegal aliens are military age men with a strong proclivity to mayhem. It doesn’t help that many are Muslim with a hereditary hatred of Christians. Not all by any means, but enough that allowing them in to the West is a huge mistake.
Import the Third World and Become the Third World
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
If your Muslim, Buddhist or Christian, it doesn’t matter what religion, if you rape anyone a severe penalty should be imposed. Severe? “Sever” type of severe will make them think twice…I would hope.
DEI presents all cultures as wonderfully diverse, equatable. and worthy of inclusion. So when a culture considers women “fair game” if: infidel, unaccompanied, with the hair not covered and you have a problem with that-
You’re a bigot.
No politician nor judge wants to be seen as a bigot.
See Theodore Dalrymple on the British court system. The late (crank) Samuel Francis coined a term for this: anarcho-tyranny.
==
One thing you see in one occidental country after another is that among the enemies of that which is good, true, and beautiful are two consequential occupational segments: the judiciary and the professoriate.
==
An apposite standard sentence for forcible rape is eight years in prison. Aliens are properly placed in preventive detention; if the case is not processed or it falls apart after they’re indicted, they can be indemnified. If they’re convicted aliens are properly denied parole and serve a clipped sentence. At the conclusion of their sentence, they are put on a plane, deported, and debarred from entry for 140 years.-
==
Stop delegating to judges any discretion over sentences.
Bobbittize.
Bobbittize them.
The Lorana Bobbitt bill [ HB 2025. ]
There. A title for the new legislation.
Again, no one should be permitted to enter the queue for a Swedish settler’s visa unless they have (1) been born or legitimately sired of someone already in the queue, or (2) married someone already in the queue or (3) entered the queue by examination. To enter the queue by examination, you have to pass a physical, pass a cursory background check, and pass an examination in the Swedish language (written and oral). You get to the head of the queue, you’re not permitted to enter until such time as every person in your family over the age of 14 has passed a cursory background check and passed the language proficiency test. For a country with Sweden’s population, the annual number of settler’s visas issued should be somewhere between 8,000 and 12,000.
==
NB, Sweden is not anywhere near any of the world’s mass refugee generators. Anyone seeking refugee status is Sweden (and their dependents) should be placed in detention and kept there until their case is fully processed. Unless they were already in Sweden for legitimate reasons when their situation at home changed or they hopped on the first plane out of Dodge and it landed in Stockholm, they should be summarily denied refugee status and deported to their home country, to a country adjacent, or to the first place they alighted after leaving their home country.
==
In a country like Sweden, temporary residency permits should be extended only to the accredited employees of foreign governments and their dependents, authentic refugees and their dependents, and students, teachers, and their dependents. The number of guest workers in the country should be 0. Sweden should have a target level for the stock of temporary residents set at about 45,000. If they’re over the target level, there’s a moratorium on the distribution of visas to students, teachers, and their dependents until such time as the number of temporary residents falls below the target level.
==
Please note, the civil war in Eritrea ended more than 30 years ago. His family should have been sent home at that time.
==
While we’re at it, you should have a salutary regime regulating immigrant reception. That means a foreign resident’s working hours each quarter are tracked by the withholdings on his payroll check. His working hours logged means he acquires ‘work credit’ on his own behalf and (with qualifications and adjustments) on behalf of his wife and children as well. Your accumulated work credit in turn regulates the terms of eligibility for programs of common provision. This is prudent policy generally for common provision, depending on the program. An immigrant, however, should have to accumulate 48 quarters of f/t work credit before his terms of eligibility match those of a native citizen. That means he faces higher deductibles on public medical insurance, higher deductibles on public ltc insurance, lower discounts on the purchase of school vouchers, &c. (Prudent societies do not in constructing programs of government-financed common provision subsidize mundane expenditures like groceries, housing, or utility bills. They do not place price controls on any good or service that is not a natural monopoly. They do not wreck their rental housing market by treating landlords and real estate developers as criminals. They limit the applicability of antidiscrimination law to the public sector).
Such injustice for this girl and her family.
Was the perpetrator confirmed to be a Muslim?
This brings to mind Assange case whereby he was tried under rape and sexual assault for refusing to wear “protection”. If you read the details of the case, it shows these women had invited Assange into his home. Without condoning his behaviour because it was immoral and plain weird, it was not a break and enter sexual assault. Yet the Swedish authorities went after him like no tomorrow.
Yet this girl, underage, was violated on her way home from work. She didnt know her attacker.
Make the two cases make sense.
“Stop delegating to judges any discretion over sentences.”
Ok so what are they being paid for if they aren’t being paid to sentence criminals?
They should be obliged to determine a sentence. That’s their job. At the end of the day they performed paid work. It should be performance reviewed.
Most people in the private sector are under performance scrutiny. Why not judges?
The problem with society is that morality has stopped being an objective universal truth, in the Christian sense, and has become relative to what the collective agree on, or what an individual determines to be their decided morality that day. That’s why out of touch judges are making these stupid decisions. It’s happening everywhere in the world.
***The problem with society is that morality has stopped being an objective universal truth, in the Christian sense, and has become relative to what the collective agree on, or what an individual determines to be their decided morality that day.***
Amen.
Ok so what are they being paid for if they aren’t being paid to sentence criminals?
==
IMO, magistrates should preside over preliminary hearings (some with adversary proceedings) held to determine if there is sufficient evidence to try an accused on a set of charges the prosecutors have identified. Trial judges should preside over criminal cases to see that legal procedures are followed, to consider motions to dismiss one or another count, to approve or reject plea agreements, and to determine guilt or innocence on each count at a bench trial if one is held. Trial judges should also have one vote on a three member judge-and-assessors panel which makes factual determinations in regard to scalars which function as arguments in sentencing formulae. (The assessors should be drawn at random from guild rolls of professions other than law – e.g. accounting, pharmacy, occupational therapy, &c). Appellate judges should review decisions in regard to disputed questions of law and in re new facts discovered. The magistrate(s), trial judge, and appellate judges would be different people.
==
The moderator takes criminal cases and may wish to dispute this. IANAL though I was once an employee of the court system.
rot13.com is a site that uses a substitution cipher, rotating letters in a text by 13. I’m using that method below for discretion.
Pbhagevrf unir qvssrerag yrtny qrsvavgvbaf bs glcrf bs frkhny nffnhyg. Vg ybbxf yvxr Fjrqvfu ynj jbhyq pynffvsl n abapbafrafhny tebcr nf encr. V’z bayl fcrphyngvat, ohg vg jbhyq rkcynva jul gur qhengvba jnf cneg bs gur ehyvat. V ungr zl pheerag frnepu uvfgbel.
Art – You are proposing something quite radical, however I can see where you are coming from. Having a panel decide the sentence, to include a variety of professions outside of the judicial system. You are now employing multiple people to do, what was traditionally, one persons job. Not sure.
It reminds me of the scene in Superman where General Zod, Ursa, and Non are sentenced to the Phantom Zone by the Ruling Council in the Kryptonjan Governemnt. But in that case, the Ruling Council was made up of a panel of elite officials rather than members of the public.
I’m still convinced that Judges performance should be reviewed. Even if it is a peer-panel review. If it isn’t already done. I’m not sure.