Burn of the Day
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
Don’t know of anyone killed by guns, but I do know of people who have died from fentanyl streaming across the border, it was unseen and did creep up on them them. Thanks to an open border, approved of course by the USCCB.
Young people are leaving the Church in droves. But it’s all okay because the liberal politician masquerading as a prince of the Church “loves” young people. Well, let’s see. Quick Bishop Gustavo, how many sexes are there, and can anyone change theirs?
We have yet to have a gun “suddenly” kill someone.
I did notice the stats being used to prove guns are the number 1 killer of kids had to include up to age 25 to get results they wanted.
I also saw the stat that 1 in 10 people effected by guns/death. But that doesn’t hold in my neck of the woods.
Sort of like monkeypox, it effects a certain group of people.
Maybe the Bishops need to find that certain group and target them. Maybe that certain group shouldn’t have guns.
I thought climate change would surely kill us by now but no such luck.
Disarmed citizenry=
Totalitarian systems=
Mass murder.
Gun ownership PREVENTS mass murder.
Jesus calmed the storm. Jesus walked on water. Jesus did not try to change climate change. So, why is the USCCB trying to change what Christ allowed to happen?
Gun ownership is self-defense. Again why is the USCCB trying to rewrite the Second Amendment?
As a now-discarded former Young Person, i.e., an Old Person, I, too, want to live. Which is why I support the SA.
“Again why is the USCCB trying to rewrite the Second Amendment?“
They jump at any opportunity to bash the party of ending abortion. While showing support for the party of open borders (and abortion.)
Why is it moral for a nation to have a military with nukes to defend itself, but wrong for an individual to have a gun to defend himself and loved ones, against a far more likely aggresson?
@Don L: Yes (a nation should have massive deterrent capabilities), but the Archbp. Gustavo-types would also like the US to unilaterally disarm from nukes, believing “it will make the world a safer place.”
These days, I have yet to meet an archbishop, cardinal, or bishop that does not now have a private security detail, of course armed, although very discreetly so.
STEVE PHOENIX: Many of the hierarchy appear to actively practice spiritual unilateral disarmament.