Ukraine War Analysis-February 1, 2023

 

 

From The Institute For The Study of War:

 

Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, February 1, 2023

Kateryna Stepanenko, Karolina Hird, Riley Bailey, Layne Philipson, Nicole Wolkov, and Frederick W. Kagan

February 1, 7:15 pm ET 

Click here to see ISW’s interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This map is updated daily alongside the static maps present in this report.

Ukrainian officials are continuing to warn about Russia’s intention of conducting a decisive offensive operation in Donbas in February and/or March, supporting ISW’s most likely course of action assessment (MLCOA). Ukrainian Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) Representative Andriy Yusov stated on February 1 that Ukraine is on the eve of an active phase of combat that will take place over the next two months.[1] Yusov noted that the poor state of Russian military equipment will force the Russian military command to mass forces to outnumber Ukrainian defenders in order to make gains. Ukrainian Colonel Serhiy Hrabskyi stated that Russia does not have sufficient forces to conduct an attack along the entire 1,500km frontline in Ukraine and will concentrate its efforts on seizing Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.[2] A prominent Russian milblogger observed that the prospect of a Russian offensive operation does not appear to be triggering panic among Ukrainian forces, who are continuing to build out their counteroffensive plans.[3] ISW reported on January 31 that Ukrainian military officials reiterated their intent to launch major counteroffensive operations by summer 2023.[4]

Russian President Vladimir Putin may be setting conditions for further Russian cross-border raids into northeastern areas of Ukraine, likely in an effort to further domestic information operations and pin Ukrainian forces against northern border areas. Putin held a meeting on February 1 to discuss the restoration of residential infrastructure in Crimea, Belgorod, Bryansk, and Kursk oblasts following “shelling by Neo-Nazi formations.”[5] Putin noted that his administration is prioritizing the ending of Ukrainian shelling of border regions, but that this task is “the business of the military department.”[6] Putin’s focus on the supposed danger of Ukrainian shelling of border regions likely serves a two-fold purpose. It furthers an information operation intended to frame the war in Ukraine as an existential threat to Russian citizens in order to generate domestic support for a protracted war. ISW has reported on previous methods by which Russian authorities have engaged in this information operation.[7] Putin may also be setting conditions for escalated cross-border raids in order to distract and disperse Ukrainian forces from critical axes of advance by pinning them to northeastern border areas. ISW continues to assess that a Russian invasion from Belarus is exceedingly unlikely, and the ongoing information operation to pin Ukrainian troops against the northern Ukraine-Belarus border seems to be faltering as Ukrainian officials increasingly assess that this contingency is improbable.[8] The threat of cross-border raids from Belgorod, Bryansk, and Kursk oblasts into northern and northeastern Ukraine is likely an attempt to force Ukraine to deploy limited elements to these areas to protect against such attacks, thus dispersing Ukrainian troops to an extent in advance of a likely Russian offensive operation in the coming months. ISW has previously reported similar Russian distraction and dispersion operations in Zaporizhia Oblast.[9]

The Kremlin is likely seizing an opportunity to discredit Igor Girkin, a prominent critical voice within the Russian nationalist space and former Russian officer, following his altercation with Wagner Group financier Yevgeny Prigozhin. Russian propagandist Vladimir Solovyov accused Girkin of cowardice following his decision to retreat from Slovyansk, Donetsk Oblast, in July 2014.[10] This is a common criticism Girkin’s enemies direct at him. Solovyov’s remarks echo Prigozhin’s ongoing efforts to attack Girkin across the Russian information space, which ISW assessed was an attempt to undermine Girkin’s patronage networks and influence among Russian ultranationalists.[11] Wagner-affiliated milbloggers also portray Girkin as a coward through shared interviews with individuals claiming to be Girkin’s acquaintances.[12] ISW previously assessed that Prigozhin’s criticism of Girkin will likely benefit the Kremlin, who will seize this opportunity to discredit an avid critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin.[13]

Key Takeaways

  • Ukrainian officials are continuing to warn about Russia’s intention of conducting a decisive offensive operation in Donbas in February and/or March, supporting ISW’s most likely course of action assessment (MLCOA).
  • Russian President Vladimir Putin may be setting conditions for further Russian cross-border raids into northeastern areas of Ukraine, likely in an effort to further domestic information operations and pin Ukrainian forces against northern border areas.
  • Russian forces continued ground attacks northeast and southwest of Bakhmut.
  • Russian forces continued limited ground attacks to regain lost positions on the Svatove-Kreminna line on February 1.
  • Russian forces are continuing to carry out unsuccessful disruption missions on islands in the Dnipro River delta in Kherson Oblast in an effort to prevent Ukrainian forces from gaining ground on the islands.
  • Russian officials plan to propose a moratorium on the public procurement law to simplify spending procedures amid an increasingly costly war effort.
  • The Wagner Group’s prison recruitment efforts may have slowed in previous months.
  • Crimean partisans may have conducted an improvised explosive device (IED) attack in occupied Crimea on January 30.

Go here to read the rest.  A fair amount of Winter still exists, but Spring is coming into sight, and with Spring we shall perhaps see offensives, by which side, or both, remains to be seen.  I think March and April would be too early for Ukraine and I think Russia has not amassed the force necessary to conduct a successful offensive in Spring.  We shall see.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Frank
Frank
Thursday, February 2, AD 2023 8:28am

Linked piece from Breitbart regarding US involvement in Ukraine. The guy is just another retired light colonel, but he has the pedigree to talk about the subject. The headline exaggerates what the guy actually says about escalation, by the way. I am not agreeing completely with Mr. Davis, but he makes what seem to me to be some good points. I was accused of being a Russian troll on another platform when I posted a link to this piece. I may be a lot of bad and sometimes stupid things, but pro-Russian ain’t one of them.

After this, I promise to shut up about how clueless the people apparently are who are making the decisions about what (and whom) we send to Ukraine.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/01/29/exclusive-lt-col-daniel-davis-warns-nuclear-war-us-no-plan-ukraine-this-not-video-game/

Frank
Frank
Thursday, February 2, AD 2023 10:49pm

.” I would note however that the Ukrainian tankers do not have to beat our tankers. They have to beat Russian tankers, most of whom are conscripts, who only want to get back to Olga as soon as possible.”
That does seem to be an important point, and fairly well ignored by the ex-military talking heads I’ve seen.
Another theory is that our Great Leaders and their NATO pals are figuring the war will be over one way or another by next winter, and they won’t have to actually deliver most of the armor they are promising, since it’s projected for late 2023.
Also a most interesting point about how the Left has always been anti-everything military, until now. It mystifies me, but it may well be as simple as the Russian hoax conditioning they have been subjected to for six years.

Scroll to Top