Saturday, April 20, AD 2024 2:20am

PopeWatch: Jesuits

Sandro Magister notes how Pope Francis has placed his fellow Jesuits in control of the Church:

 

Incredible but true. Just now now when in a few decades it has lost a good half of its forces, the Society of Jesus has surged to the heights of command of the Catholic Church as never before.

Francis’s story is well known. He is the first Jesuit pope in history: he who notwithstanding had more adversaries than friends in the Society and took care not to set foot in its general curia whenever he came to Rome as a cardinal.

But the innovation is that in this last phase of his pontificate – declining in age but not in ambitions – Francis has equipped himself with a veteran attack team, all his own and made up entirely of Jesuits.

The top man of this team is without a doubt Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich (pictured), archbishop of Luxembourg. Top man, in Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s plans, both for today and for tomorrow.

For today, the task assigned to him by Francis is to steer, as relator general, the world synod that got underway in 2021 and will last at least until 2024, but in the pope’s mind even beyond, with the task of remodeling the Church under the banner of none other than a permanent “synodality.”

While for tomorrow it is no mystery that Hollerich is also Francis’s candidate “in pectore” for his succession, on which the current synod will have decisive influence, effectively obliging the future pope – whoever he may be – to take delivery on and continue the “process,” a bit as happened to Paul VI with the Vatican Council II inherited from John XXIII.

The general rehearsal of this world synod is the one underway in Germany, which is already infecting other national Churches without Francis’s opposing any effective restraint, with the inevitable litany of fashionable reforms, ranging from married priests to women priests, from new sexual and homosexual morality to the democratization of Church governance.

It is impossible not to recall that some of these were the reforms that another great Jesuit, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini (1927-2012), had included in the agenda of the future Church in a memorable 1999 speech. Martini is known to have had a negative view of Bergoglio, but the supporters of the current pontificate are having a field day making him the “prophet” of the reforms for which Francis is supposedly paving the way at last and of which Hollerich has already repeatedly said he is in favor.

“L’Osservatore Romano” published last October 24 a comprehensive agenda-setting interview with this cultured Jesuit cardinal with twenty-seven years of mission in Japan behind him. And in it he once again expressed the hope for “a paradigm change” in the pastoral care and doctrine of the Church on homosexuality, because homosexuals too “are the fruit of creation” and therefore are not “rotten apples” but “something good.” Of course, there is no room – the cardinal added – for a sacramental marriage between persons of the same sex, because the procreative purpose that characterizes a marriage is lacking, “but this does not mean that their affective union has no value.”

And to the editor of “L’Osservatore Romano” who brought up the fact that the bishops of Belgium have spoken out in favor of the blessing of homosexual unions, Hollerich replied: “Frankly, the question does not seem decisive to me. If we keep to the etymology of ‘bene-dire’ [bless, literally ‘well-speak,’ Tr.], do you think that God could ever ‘dire-male’ [‘speak ill,’ Tr.] of two persons who care about each other?”

These words of Hollerich’s spontaneously bring up the question: but wasn’t it another high-ranking Jesuit at the Vatican, Cardinal Luis F. Ladaria, in his capacity as prefect of the congregation for the doctrine of the faith, who prohibited the blessing of homosexual unions in a “Responsum” made public on March 15 2021?

And was it not Francis himself who had “given his consent” to the publication of this “Responsum,” after having been “informed” of it, as written at the bottom of the document?

Just so. Except, however, to take note that the following Sunday, at the Angelus, the pope had made it clear that he had no liking at all for “theoretical condemnations” or “claims of legalism or clerical moralism” where what are needed instead are “gestures of love.” And “authoritative Vatican sources” had anonymously made it known that with this he was criticizing none other than the “Responsum” that prohibited the blessing of homosexual unions, which he had approved in words.

In short, humiliated by his confrere the pope, the hapless Cardinal Ladaria is the exception that confirms the rule. He is the old school Jesuit whom Bergoglio keeps on the bench while waiting to send him into retirement, off his team. Requiring him in the meantime to answer “no” to those cardinals – and there have been some – who have asked him to call Hollerich back to respect for correct doctrine.

But in addition to Hollerich, there are two other Jesuits whom Francis has recently made cardinals and has put on the team in important roles.

The first is the Canadian Michael Czerny, for many years more a competitor than a coworker of the Ghanaian cardinal Peter K. A. Turkson, first at the pontifical council for justice and peace and then at the dicastery for promoting integral human development, of which he has now become prefect. Czerny was also the special secretary of the synod for the Amazon. From the defense of nature to migrants, to the “popular movements,” he is the man Bergoglio avails himself of in these fields he favors.

The second is the Italian Gianfranco Ghirlanda, former rector of the Pontifical Gregorian University and a seasoned expert in canon law. Among his tasks is that of translating into juridical provisions the imperious acts that Francis carries out with the air of an absolute monarch. From Ghirlanda, for example, came the perfunctory conclusion of the longstanding theological dispute between powers of orders, those derived from episcopal ordination, and powers of jurisdiction, those conferred by a higher authority, opting for the latter in order to place some lay people as well, men or women, at the head of the Vatican curia, with the simple mandate of the pope. Again from Ghirlanda, in his role of juridical “factotum” at the service of Francis, came the dismantling and refounding imposed by the pope on the Order of Malta.

But that’s not all. Also among Jesuits who are not cardinals there are some whom the pope has placed in key roles, at his service.

In the general secretariat of the synod of bishops there is a consultant who is in fact the associate closest to Cardinal Hollerich. It is Fr. Giacomo Costa, former editor of the magazine “Aggiornamenti Sociali” of the Milan Jesuits and vice-president of the Fondazione Carlo Maria Martini.

Not to mention Fr. Antonio Spadaro, editor of “La Civiltà Cattolica” and very close to Francis since his election as pope, he too very active and urgent in promoting the world synod on synodality and in particular in involving in the adventure – with important help from his predecessor at “La Civiltà Cattolica,” Bartolomeo Sorge (1929-2020) – the Italian episcopal conference, initially very distrustful.

Go here to read the rest.  Time for another suppression of the Jesuits.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Father of Seven
Father of Seven
Tuesday, November 1, AD 2022 7:01am

So the head of the Jesuits, Arturo Sosa, said we have to interpret Jesus’ words in the Gospels because “there were no tape recorders” at the time Jesus lived. St. Ignatius is spinning in his grave. No man of faith can swear obedience to Sosa. Why anyone would remain a Jesuit today is beyond me.

Mary De Voe
Tuesday, November 1, AD 2022 7:01am

Sodomy is suicide for homosexuals as the male sperm when mature causes masculinity in the man short on masculinity in homosexuality.
Jesus Christ says the Mass. Women cannot act “in persona Christi.”
There is one true God and true man in the Hypostatic Union, Jesus Christ who is the Revelation of His Father.
Sodomites and militant women revile Jesus Christ and do not receive Jesus Christ. How will destroying Truth (Pontius Pilate tried to do that) bring about real Faith? Sodomites and women priests wash their hands of Jesus Christ. These individuals have self-excommunicated themselves and nothing can change that except themselves.
The Synod ought to fast track the Sacrament of Reconciliation to accomplish what they are endeavoring.

Donald Link
Tuesday, November 1, AD 2022 8:55am

In general, with very few exceptions, it has proven not a good idea to select Popes from the religious orders. Even in the lesser ranks of ordered scarlet and purple, eccentricities to almost heresy, have cropped up to the extent that would disqualify many from occupying positions of universal authority. The tradition of selecting most Cardinals and the Pope from outside the orders should probably be reinstated.

John F. Kennedy
John F. Kennedy
Tuesday, November 1, AD 2022 10:48am

Today at St. Xavier Church in downtown Cincinnati, I learned that a good definition of a Saint is “A dead sinner whose life has been brought up and edited.” In fact the priest said he liked that one. I also learned of at least one Saint who was a cheater of cards. He implied that we’ll probably all be Saints.

No one was wearing a mask in the entire church. When it was time for Communion, there was the Rite of Purell-ification and the priest put on a black mask. There were other issues as well throughout the Mass. I had enough. The mask was the final straw. I walked out.

The Jesuits are an apostate order.

Madgalene
Madgalene
Tuesday, November 1, AD 2022 11:23am

Wasn’t it true that Jesuits were not to accept episcopal appointments in the first place? And to have the remaining corrupted Jesuits in charge is only to bring the Church down the path of destruction that is decimating the Jesuits who have long since lost their charism.

Clinton
Clinton
Tuesday, November 1, AD 2022 4:48pm

Back in my undergrad days, my roommate in the dorm brought me into the circle of his childhood friends. While my roommate had gone to public school, all these friends had gone to a very exclusive Jesuit prep. Without exception, those Jesuit-educated boys were not merely indifferent to the Faith, but openly contemptuous of Her. I got the impression that their disdain for the Church wasn’t in spite of their teachers, but in fact learned from them.

A few years later, I found myself working with two other graduates of that Jesuit prep, and they were both as contemptuous of the Catholic Faith as the crowd I’d met as an undergrad. In fact, I have yet to meet a graduate of that school who is a practicing Catholic today.

J. Ronald Parrish
Wednesday, November 2, AD 2022 7:36am

Suicide by infiltration. How did these men secure their positions of leadership in the Church? Almost without exception, their appointments have been by what I always considered orthodox Popes. Why? When pewsitters constantly hear heresy from their leadership, eventually a majority of them will come to believe and support it. The Church founded by Jesus is indefectable and will exist till the end of time. Is that Church still the one headed by Bergolio and his henchmen? A sincere question. If not, where is it? If it is, how to reconcile truth with 2+2=5. A provocative question from a sincere Catholic due to respect held for commenters on this blog.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top