I’m not a big fan of the term “The New Evangelization” because in the end, and in any age, there is either good evangelization or bad evangelization. Either we are preaching The Good News effectively, or we are not. And The Good News is not just some concept of humanitarianism, but boils down to this: “Always remember that Jesus Christ, a descendant of King David, was raised from the dead. This is the Good News I preach” (2 Tim 2:8, New Living Translation).
The word “new” in everyday language is also misunderstood as meaning “better”, when all it really means is not existing before or already existing, but experienced for the first time. And sometimes what is new is “worse”, like “New Coke”, from a long time ago in a nation far, far away.
Christians in the new evangelization around the year 2021 must sometimes feel like Christians in the old evangelization around the year in 221, preaching to a pagan society and anxious about persecution, but this recent article points out one striking difference between then and now:
“The early Christians lived in a pagan society untouched by the Good News. Our culture is deeply shaped by rejection of that News and by a sustained effort to live life on explicitly non- or even anti-Christian grounds. If we are not absolutely clear about that, much effort will be simply wasted.”
The story of God and Man in salvation history is told in terms of covenants, family and adoption. Considering the quotation above, I think of an orphan who does not know there is a very wealthy and loving father extremely eager to adopt him or her as his own child. Today, it’s more like the orphan already heard the story about some mysterious “father” long ago, but either does not believe it or does not care. Worse yet, the child may see the father as an enemy or some kind of competitor. Today’s “new” evangelization is the more daunting task.
Being pessimistic, I fear it will all end up like the parable of the wedding feast in Matthew 22, where a king dispatched his servants to summon the invited guests. Although the guests were well informed, they refused to come. Some ignored the invitation, but the rest mistreated the king’s servants and killed them, so the enraged king destroyed them and burned their city.
Being optimistic, I think of the Blessed Virgin Mary holding back the wrath of God and buying us time. There is also the story of Abraham interceding for Sodom in Genesis 18. For the sake of a few righteous people, an entire city could be spared.
So what can we do? We pray and evangelize however we can, but simply striving to be holy may not only benefit us in the next life, but benefit everyone in this life too.
I don’t like the term “new evangelization” either. It’s similar to a “day of evangelization” my parish sponsored a few years ago where people went out into the neighborhood to invite to Mass. Ok, but “new”? and a single “day”?
Obviously “re-evangelization” is needed and we have to be in it for long haul, taking the Faith seriously and not being cafeteria catholics, only then will we be taken seriously.
Pagans were much easier to evangelize then the sophisticated None’s of today and the Faith was stronger then, there were no cafeteria catholics.
The term “New Evangelization” literally means “the New Good News.” There is NO “New Good News.” There is only THE Good News, 2nd Timothy 2:8 from the NLT quoted above being a case in point. I am sick and tired of this constant Orwellian Newspeak.
“There is also the story of Abraham interceding for Sodom in Genesis 18. For the sake of a few righteous people, an entire city was spared.”
… Turn the page, Sodom wasn’t spared. There weren’t ten good people there. 🙂
I think the “New” evangelization simply means new places/avenues for evangelization. Media, Social media, digital fora, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and the like. But looking around those places, the good/evil ratio seems comparable to that or Sodom. (IMHO)
@CAG.
Typo (blush)
Should be “could be spared”. I can change that.
@ Ben
Ha! I figured. I always thought it was important that Chapter 18 ends with a feeling of hope that Sodom might not be destroyed, but then you turn the page and the Angels are already in town experiencing first hand the justification of God’s decision.
… This morning I turned the page to find out that Biden has given justification for every elitist liberal employer in the U.S. to treat their filthy unvaxed employees as subhuman. The more things change …
I don’t know if I agree with Royal’s analysis. It’s focused on the the post-Christian liberal urban Western culture. That culture is very influential around the world, and it rejects Christian thinking. But it faces a lot of opposition within the West, and a good deal of the non-West can recognize the Christian foundations of that post-Christian culture. So there are a few different currents at work. The post-Christian may not have rejected the faith, or even have thought about its content before.
@CAG
Maybe Biden will find out that most of the Taliban won’t get vax-ed. Then he’ll show them who’s boss!