Follow the Science

The mantra of Follow the Science is a betrayal of science.  It is an attempt to transform a method of attaining knowledge about the natural world into a religion or a political party.  It would reduce science into a shibboleth to be invoked as a club against those of differing religious or political views and is usually voiced by those who are often quite illiterate about actual science.  We have been down this path before in the totalitarian regimes of the last century and it does not end well.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David WS
David WS
Wednesday, April 7, AD 2021 4:23am

Behind every “Trust the Science” there’s someone looking for blind trust. I don’t trust politicians and certainly not “journalists”, but I also don’t trust scientists -they’re people too.

Dave G.
Dave G.
Wednesday, April 7, AD 2021 5:13am

My sons and I were talking, as we are wont to do. They said something that I think is spot on. There is no greater indictment on science than transgenderism. If we accept what they now say about transgenderism, with there being no real, objectively biological gender, or there being more than two genders, then the entire scientific world was 100% wrong for the history of the scientific world. I went through their old science books from homeschooling, and some old books I still had from school and college, and they’re right. In no section about gender was there ever a footnote or suggestion that gender was anything other than male and female, evolution of sexual reproduction, chromosomes and anatomy and the like. If transgenderism as currently promoted is true, that’s saying the entire scientific world can be 100% sure and yet end up being wrong. Therefore, waving the ‘follow the science’ banner the way the press does should not have the punch it has, if the press is right about transgenderism. . I think they’re onto something.

T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Wednesday, April 7, AD 2021 5:32am

Not the scientific method. Post-modern science starts with the paid-for or politicized finding and strives to convince everybody the agenda-driven opinion is science.

Science: How TX has no China virus panic restriction (38,000 people in a ball park) and fewer China virus cases than MI which has harsh restrictions and 20,000,000 fewer people.

The view from 30,000 feet: Those people love the China virus. It’s their “Woodstock.” They never want it to end.

The oligarchs politicized it from day-one. They used it (and massive vote fraud) to remove the first American President since Reagan. They never let a crisis go to waste.

Ben Butera
Admin
Wednesday, April 7, AD 2021 6:50am

You could do an ongoing series of posts about this covering gender, marriage, pro-life, Covid, etc. The problem with following the science is that in reality people only “follow” the data they like and ignore, downplay, dismiss or over-scrutinize the data they don’t like.

Ezabelle
Ezabelle
Wednesday, April 7, AD 2021 3:48pm

No different Philip than those police officers who stood on the altar of the Church in London the other day in a loud bellowing voice the officer was threatening to fine people for breaking Covid lockdown laws. And yet the restrictions on the Faithful at
Church service gatherings is – no singing and responding in quiet whispered voices. No different- both hypocrites on a power trip.

GUY MCCLUNG
Admin
Wednesday, April 7, AD 2021 6:57pm

from my article: https://catholicstand.com/credo-scientific-dogma-part-ii-powerism/:
“Scientist Soldiers
In his thoughts about the use/abuse of science by those in power, Robert S. Cohen begins with two spot-on pertinent quotes, one from C.S. Lewis and one from Max Horkheimer:
“ C.S. Lewis: ‘What we call man’s power over nature turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men, with nature as its Instrument.’
Max Horkheimer: ‘The ideological dimension of science comes to light, above all, in what science closes its eyes to’. ’’ (Cohen, Id. P. 223)
For Cohen, many scientists who had become “servants of power,”have enlisted now as are “soldiers of power”. Soldiers must obey, says Cohen, and, in the past, the task of the scientist was to question, not to “obey” when someone said something was true (Id., pp. 226-227). Today science is permeated, funded, and corrupted by the “scientific obedience to power.” (Id., p. 227). Scientists have become the laboratory mercenaries of powerism.”

Scroll to Top