The Fraud in Michigan
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 41 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
Sickening.
I can’t help but recall the battle cry of the Left; “Radicalize.”
The scoundrels listened and carried out the dirty deeds.
Perfectly flat ballots….in too much of a hurry to cover their tracks.
Prostitutes. Those who participated in this fraud are cheap, dirty whores.
They must be found out, taken to court and duly held accountable for their deeds.
Shame on them.
Detroit, my home town, has been a 3rd world city for a long time. Corruption, riots, murder is the norm. Black population over 80%.
A very iberal, now woke, (and sadly former) friend of mine considered a job in Detroit–it would be much closer to home. He turned it down for a job in Texas (granted, in a fairly liberal large city). One of the reasons is that Detroit is corrupt as all heck.
As a Canadian I have to say, with sadness, that your presidential election was unworthy of a first world democracy. The fraud is clear, egregious and appalling. I am a great admirer of my American cousins and your republic but am embarrassed for you for what I see unfolding. Americans patriots must stand firm against the theft of your election. Much depends on this well beyond your borders.
Completely agree John.
This lady is credible. Or else she deserves an Oscar. Ditto Mr. Morgan, the USPS truck driver from Lancaster PA, on FB this morning, regarding the USPS truckload of ballots gone missing. Why is our government not investigating? St. Catherine Laboure, we pray for a miraculous intervention.
Conspiracy theories that have been rejected by every single judge who has heard the “evidence” (including several Trump-appointed judges!) and calling the other side “prostitutes.” This is what’s become of a “Catholic” website?
The cases you reference have almost all been dismissed only on procedural grounds. There has been no true evidentiary hearing yet in any court. In my 38 years as an attorney I know that no Judge can possibly rule on the validity of evidence until he has had an evidentiary hearing.
We are just about the most affluent of occidental countries. Other countries register higher on certain metrics due to natural resource bonanzas (e.g Norway) or accounting conventions in re corporate income (e.g. Ireland). Switzerland is just about the only place in the world where real incomes are actually higher. That’s our private sector at work.
As for our public sector, recall John Derbyshire’s remark that he’d dealt with the civil service in several occidental countries and several oriental countries and he was sorry to say that the US had the worst public employees he’d encountered. We just do not build public bureaucracies in this country that are worth a tinker’s damn. Here we have a task which requires no organizational innovation and no equipment that isn’t found in an ordinary office bar some electromechanical tabulating machines. They invest in technology they don’t need which in turn injures performance. OTOH, legislatures won’t do simple things which would streamline tasks. It’s all a sh!t show to a degree it wasn’t 40 years ago.
Historical note: The dems have been in the thick of election fraud since Jefferson-Adams-Burr in 1800 and a number of times since. The one time the Republicans tried (through the electoral college in 1876) it backfired and President Hays was defeated for re-election.
Does anyone else find it really funny that Mr. Nachazel describes those who participated in horrifically lazy, open fraud for “progress” and John the eternally shocked and/or horrified decides that includes all non-conservatives?
Because that’s an own-goal worthy of keeping company with “vote fraud organization” when asked about getting out the vote.
“ Does anyone else find it really funny that Mr. Nachazel describes those who participated in horrifically lazy, open fraud for “progress” and John the eternally shocked and/or horrified decides that includes all non-conservatives?”
Yes. Excellent point.