https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKzw9zABVIE
Thought For the Day
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
Massive Voter Fraud
Biden
Didn’t
Win . . .
Seventy Million Americans Know It.
If they’re going to submit a fraudulent ballot, why fill in just Biden and not the House candidate too? Were presidential and Congress votes counted separately? Definitely suspicious, just trying to understand why they’d fraud one, but not the other…
Quicker. Plus you don’t want to impact down ballot races which are more likely to be discovered. Presidential statewide totals are one thing. Fake ballots cast in smaller areas are much noticeable to people keenly interested in those down ballot races where recounts and challenges are much more common than in Presidential contests, which are almost never seriously examined.
Yeah, the GOP picked up a significant number of House seats when they were projected to get pushed deeper into the minority. And the party has good odds to hold the Senate.
And the Dems didn’t flip a single State legislature? Not even in suddenly blue again Michigan, where the polls (snort) showed them likely retaking the State House?
Yet Biden won.
I just realized this “Thought for the Day” is in Virginia?? They were so desperate that they cheated there?
If they’re going to submit a fraudulent ballot, why fill in just Biden and not the House candidate too?
You fill in the races that pay you.
At least, that’s how it works in Washington state– whoever buys the votes selects where they want them to go for, and that’s all that’s filled out. Happened with both weed and redefining marriage, lots of votes that were blank except for one issue.
Makes it so you can sell the same ballot multiple times as long as it’s different races, and so that the customers don’t assume someone else on their “side” will buy it.
I just realized this “Thought for the Day” is in Virginia?? They were so desperate that they cheated there?
Yes. Friend’s academy classmate got off work (federal employee), went in to vote and was informed he’d already voted at an “undisclosed location,” in person.
Can guess how happy he was with that.
Since there’s a core electorate (about 37% of those eligible) which votes every year and a peripheral electorate (about 18%) which vote only when the presidency is up, it doesn’t strike me as odd. OTOH, you could look at the 2012 results for a benchmark.
Votes cast:
Michigan:
=For Presidential electors: 4.731 million
=For U.S. House candidates: 4.575 million
Wisconsin:
=For Presidential electors: 3.068 million
=For U.S. House candidates: 2.956 million
Minnesota:
=For Presidential Electors: 2.937 million
=For US House candidates: 2.813 million
Pennsylvania:
=For Presidential electors: 5.753 million
=For U.S. House candidates: 5.556 million
Georgia:
=For Presidential electors: 3.90 million
=For U.S. House candidates: 3.554 million
Arizona:
=For Presidential electors: 2.307 million
=For U.S. House candidates: 2.173 million
Nevada
=For Presidential electors: 1.015 million
=For U.S. House candidates: 0.974 million
Alaska:
=For Presidential electors: 0.30 million
=For U.S. House candidate: 0.29 million
The states in question had at that time anywhere from 1 to 18 congressional districts. The difference between the presidential tally and the congressional tally per district was as follows:
Michigan: 11,140
Wisconsin: 14,000
Minnesota: 14,250
Pennsylvania: 10,940
Georgia: 24,710
Arizona: 14,890
Nevada: 10,250
Alaska: 10,000
Hmmm. The innocent explanation is that these differentials are quite variable by district (i.e. the distribution curve is flat, with only a modest number at the central tendency and a great many in the tails). I suppose you’d have to check to see if that’s all that common. Still, when you usually have 4-5% casting a ballot in the marquee race and begging off the others and you have a district where 30% doing so, it’s worth an audit.
NB, if my means conceal a great deal of variation from district to district, recall that the states in question have a mean of 8.44 districts. If you have a gap of 93,000 votes in one district, that has to be amortized across the other. The mean gap per district in the states in question in 2012 was 14,600 votes. (93000-14600) / 7.44 = 10,600, so the mean differential in the other districts in a given state would have to bounce around 4,000 votes if you had that one district where the gap in ballots cast was 93,000 votes.
Quicker. Plus you don’t want to impact down ballot races which are more likely to be discovered. Presidential statewide totals are one thing. Fake ballots cast in smaller areas are much noticeable to people keenly interested in those down ballot races where recounts and challenges are much more common than in Presidential contests, which are almost never seriously examined.
Not sure that’s the reason. It’s atypical for U.S. House members to be held to under 60% of the vote. Stealing a seat requires massive fraud. Statewide races tend to be more competitive, so you’re within the feasible cheating margin.