1

Grant Puts a Stop to Treason Trials

 

 

It is  little remembered now, but in 1865 there was a brief attempt to conduct treason trials against Confederate generals.  On June 7, 1865, U.S. District Judge John C. Underwood in Norfolk, Virginia issued indictments against Lee, Longstreet, Early and other Confederate generals on charges of treason.  Lee wrote to General Grant asking if the terms granted at Appomattox were still in effect.  Furious at this attempt to undo his work, Grant immediately wrote to Secretary of War Stanton:

 

In my opinion the officers and men paroled at Appomattox Court-House, and since, upon the same terms given to Lee, cannot be tried for treason so long as they observe the terms of their parole. This is my understanding. Good faith, as well as true policy, dictates that we should observe the conditions of that convention. Bad faith on the part of the Government, or a construction of that convention subjecting the officers to trial for treason, would produce a feeling of insecurity in the minds of all the paroled officers and men. If so disposed they might even regard such an infraction of terms by the Government as an entire release from all obligations on their part. I will state further that the terms granted by me met with the hearty approval of the President at the time, and of the country generally. The action of Judge Underwood, in Norfolk, has already had an injurious effect, and I would ask that he be ordered to quash all indictments found against paroled prisoners of war, and to desist from further prosecution of them.

Grant then saw President Johnson.  Initially Johnson said that the treason trials should proceed.  Grant said he would immediately resign his commission if the Government went back on what he pledged at Appomattox.  Johnson backed down and had the indictments quashed.  Grant then wrote back to Lee on June 20, 1865 saying that the terms of Appomattox would be observed.  He did not mention that it took his threat of resignation to accomplish it.

Share With Friends
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Donald R. McClarey

Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three and happily married for 35 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.

One Comment

  1. All this means is now Grant’s statues and memory will have to be desecrated. Guilt by association is enough for the iconoclasts. But this is a timely reminder when we hear so frequently that the Confederates were “traitors” or guilty of “treason.” Not only did Grant and other Unionists want to show leniency, but as a practical matter, applying a strict definition of treason to the people of the South would have required charging literally thousands upon thousands of Southerners who aided and abetted the Confederacy. Cooler heads and a war-weary populace thankfully prevailed.

Comments are closed.