Fort Hood Massacre, President Obama, and George Tiller the Killer
Isn’t it interesting that President Obama is pleading for us to “not to rush to judgment” concerning the Fort Hood Massacre that was executed by Malik Nidal Hasan who is an extremist Muslim. Yet President Obama called out the National Guard to protect abortion mills when George Tiller the Killer was killed by a deranged man and not a pro-life advocate?
Double standard you think?
Yeah. But just remember that this is the same administration that called “right-wing” groups such as pro-lifers as a threat to national security and not one mention of extremist Muslims or Muslim organizations that operate within the United States or abroad.
President Obama and his administration represent a world view that is un-American with values that only Moloch would love. Catering to the politically correct sympathies and dogmas of modern liberalism while demonizing pro-life organizations that only seek to protect the most vulnerable among us.
Let’s pray for a one term Obama presidency and a strong candidate to emerge to represent the best of most Americans.
_._
To read more about the Fort Hood Massacre click here.
To read more about the murder of George Tiller the Killer click here.
To read more about President Obama demonizing Pro-Lifers the same day that George Tiller the Killer was killed click here.
To read more of the Obama Administration categorizing Pro-Life groups as terrorists click here.
To read more by Ralph Peters of the New York Post on President Obama’s response to the Fort Hood Massacre click here.
12 Responses to Fort Hood Massacre, President Obama, and George Tiller the Killer
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_YqM_zH1K7Uw/TOK1hLlt3BI/AAAAAAAAA1o/HCzoksN1-ME/s1600/email+icon+32x32.png")
- Jon commented on Lincoln and the Will of God
(2 minutes ago) - Mike the Geek commented on At Last Night's Emergency SCHISM Meeting...
(2 hours ago) - Jon commented on What Wondrous Love Is This?
(2 hours ago) - Cris Kramschuster commented on Why it is Worth Worrying: On the Brink of a New Pontificate
(5 hours ago) - philip commented on On the Resignation of Pope Benedict XVI
(6 hours ago) - c matt commented on Fools to Judge his Papacy
(6 hours ago) - Mandy P. commented on We Must Not Forget
(7 hours ago) - Another Mom commented on We Must Not Forget
(7 hours ago) - Phillip commented on At Last Night's Emergency SCHISM Meeting...
(8 hours ago) - southernsue commented on Lincoln and the Will of God
(8 hours ago) - Greg Mockeridge commented on Fools to Judge his Papacy
(9 hours ago) - Elizabeth commented on Fools to Judge his Papacy
(11 hours ago) - Phillip commented on Fools to Judge his Papacy
(11 hours ago) - philip commented on What Wondrous Love Is This?
(1 days ago) - Mary@42 commented on On the Resignation of Pope Benedict XVI
(1 days ago)
I agree Tito – the double standard is as blatant as it is ridiculous. The government and the media did nothing as pro-lifers as a whole were vilified by the left.
We are not a protected group. Neither, for that matter, are innocent unborn children.
Thank you, Tito.
Agreed, the double standard is absurd. But should we avoid fooling ourselves into thinking that Republicans don’t do the same thing?
Let’s not forget how quick Obama was to condemn the Cambridge police in the Gate arrest.
Phillip – Also, how long it took him to barely criticize the Iranian elections and subsequent crackdown.
According to the NRO, the NY Times has published a piece describing the heroic Michael Mansoor as an example of a patriotic and selfless Muslim serviceman who threw himself on a grenade to save others.
In its zeal to promote Muslim servicemen, the Times got one little detail wrong – Mansoor was in fact a devout Catholic.
You can see how such a mistake would happen, given the problems that paper has with the Catholic faith. To their hive minds, devout Catholics = child molesting priests and “anti-choice fanatics”, not heroes, while Muslims are all noble and good.
From NRO:
In this New York Times story on Muslims serving in the U.S. military, the Times presents Navy SEAL Michael Monsoor, who earned the Congressional Medal of Honor for throwing himself on a grenade to save his team members in 2006, as a Muslim. It quotes a Muslim Army reservist who cites Monsoor as an example of a Muslim service member who gave his life for his country, and the Times lets the assertion stand. But Monsoor was a devout Catholic, as his Department of Defense official biography clearly states.
Donna V.,
Could you send me the link? Thanks!
Joe & Pinky,
Thank you, it had to be pointed out. It was obvious to me.
Eric,
Absolutely agree.
Arlen Spector, then a Republican, made the remark of how the Catholic Church was intolerant towards science and brought up the Galileo incident. Can’t remember the context of which he spoke about this, so if anyone can remind me what it was it’ll make for a good follow-up article in the future.
wow, I just read that Times article. That’s a pretty douche-bag (pardon the language) move by the NYT. Really ticks me off that they were so desperate to find counter examples that they resorted (as usual, i guess) to outright falsehoods for which they will no doubt issue a correction that is hidden away among the folds of a later issue.
Not to go off-topic, but I recently read a defense of Tiller’s killer somewhere (http://www.takimag.com/site/article/righteous_zeal_and_the_murder_of_george_tiller/).
I mean, what does one do when a state-sanctioned serial killer is loose in the world? Isn’t there some context that allows for individual citizens to do something about those people? If there was a known serial killer in public and he had publicly stated his intentions to kill again, is there no recourse for the sane members of society?
I think I might agree with Gottfried that Tiller’s killing was not necessarily murder. However, his killing will undoubtedly result in harder times for the pro-life movement, but I’m not sure that is enough to make the actual act immoral.
Tiller had killed some 60 thousand innocent people. I have a hard time believing that tiller’s killer could be guilty of murder.
Highly theological, though. probably so much so as to render any treatment of it in this limited space more of a detriment to the understanding of it.
Sorry for not posting it earlier, Tito. In the updated version, Mansoor is referred to as a Christian:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/us/09muslim.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2&hp
With this added at the end:
Earlier versions of this article misstated the religion and rank of Michael A. Monsoor and the act he performed that earned him the Medal of Honor.
Donna V.,
Thanks for the link!