State of the Race

 

 

I used to think that I knew a lot about politics in this country until I began listening to Rchard Baris and Robert Barnes.  Watch the above video.  They far surpass me in granular political knowledge of the states down below the county level.  Before the Hunter Biden Ukraine e-mails I thought we were heading to a Trump electoral college victory similar to 2016.  Now I think Trump will do as well as he did in the electoral college in 2016 and far better in the popular vote.  We still have slightly over half a month and events come fast and furious this year, and things could change, but that is how I see the race currently.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 5:59am

I know Trump is polarizing, but I just can’t imagine he’s so polarizing that people would stand in line to early- vote for Joe Biden.

Maybe that’s a failure of imagination.

Dale Price
Dale Price
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 8:59am

They apparently are early voting for Joe.
And while the polls are probably off a bit, it will be the most catastrophic polling failure ever if Trump betters 2016.

I can conjure up narrow win scenarios for him. But holding rallies in Iowa and Georgia does not suggest the fundamentals of the race going Trump’s way.

Coronavirus is his Achilles heel, and the campaign’s messaging on it is nearly nonexistent.

Art Deco
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 9:14am

I’m not optimistic.

Ernst Scheiber
Ernst Scheiber
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 9:20am

Trump ought to be running away with this. And maybe he is.

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 9:37am
Struggling Catholic
Struggling Catholic
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 11:53am

What I fear the most is what I have feared all along – the massive amount of fraud that is going to take place.

Professor Helmut Norpoth, whose model is based on the early primary election results and has correctly predicted presidential election results in all but 2 cases since 1912, gives Trump a 91 percent change of winning. However, the two times his model failed were the 1960 and 2000 elections. Both were razor thin and we know now that JFK was won with the help of LBJ and Mayor Daley cheating in Texas and Chicago. The cheating will be widespread this year and not just in 2 states.

c matt
c matt
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 11:56am

Now I think Trump will do as well as he did in the electoral college in 2016 and far better in the popular vote.

From your keyboard to God’s . . . monitor?

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 2:29pm

More reason to hope?

via Ace of Spades, who writes:

National polls show that a greater percentage of Biden’s voters intend to vote early than on election day.

So Biden actually should have far more early voters right now in these swing states, because he’s going to have fewer votes on Election Day.

But the ballots cast show Republicans keeping pace with Democrats.

Rudolph Harrier
Rudolph Harrier
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 2:33pm

If we believe polls, then its been well established that Republicans have a far higher preference for election day voting than Democrats. Thus if we believe that party affiliation in early voting is an accurate measure of who is ahead (which it really isn’t due to the number of independents) it should follow that any state where voter registration is ahead on the Republican side, tied, or only very slightly to the dem side (let’s say less than 5 points to the dem side) is a lock for President Trump.

If that is true, then the following battleground states are a lock:

Michigan (dead heat in registration)
Ohio (republicans up by 4 points)
Georgia (dems up by 4)
Wisconsin (dems up by 2)

But I honestly don’t know how helpful early registration numbers are at all. For example, the dems are up by 20 in Oklahoma, up by 29 in Kentucky, and up by 19 in Utah. Does anyone seriously think that the president isn’t going to carry those states? If you do, you have to go against the polls that doomsayers are citing because he’s well ahead in all of those states.

Rudolph Harrier
Rudolph Harrier
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 2:39pm

Here’s something else to consider:
at this time last year Clinton was polling better than Biden is in Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida, North Carolina and Arizona. But Trump won all of those states even with the worse polling numbers.

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 2:54pm

Still more of the same:

The data also seem to contradict claims made about the shy Trump voters. If there is no “silent majority,” why aren’t the Democrats ahead in the phase of the election upon which they have placed so much emphasis? They are enjoying expected mail-in leads in other battleground states, like North Carolina, but they always do. In 2016, Clinton had a seven-point lead in North Carolina on October 25, but Trump won the state by more than 3 percent on Election Day. In Florida and Pennsylvania, it was closer but the story was much the same. In the end, the pollsters are clueless and the “experts” are wrong on shy voters. All that matters is who shows up, and early Rust Belt turnout suggests another Trump victory.

Although I suppose they’re all just whistling past the graveyard, so to speak.

Struggling Catholic
Struggling Catholic
Friday, October 16, AD 2020 6:20pm

This is very heartening, although it must have caused Newsweek readers to gnash their teeth:

Just in: final FL voter reg. data. Since this March’s primary, here are each party’s net gains:

GOP: 344,465

Dem: 197,821

NPA/Other: 197,818

Compare to the same period in ’16:

GOP: 274,207

Dem: 307,961

NPA/Other: 220,857

Trump’s ’16 FL margin: 112,911 votes

— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) October 16, 2020

Scroll to Top