They All Look Alike to Whoopi
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
Open mouth and remove all doubt.
……………racist queen mother………..
Oh yes. Biden. The great uniter. Obama. The savior of America.
I guess we could of anticipated her remarks based upon her support for the two “hero president’s” that she helped into office.
What a hell of a thing to say, on air!
I hope her fat trap rips apart their ratings and advertisers pull out of the program. That would be poetic justice.
There’s a particular type of anti semitism (envy and hate) that thrives in minds of some members of the black community:
“Jews couldn’t have been persecuted, they have light skin and so many are successful.”
They hate Truth like Satan hates Holy Water.
After all these years I still have yet to discern any real talent in this woman. She is just a big mouth that happens to be attached to a person with dark skin. Her exit from the public stage would be a blessing.
Her following is large, hence the scandalous influence she can have on others.
A ray of hope in Arizona;
https://m.theepochtimes.com/arizona-senate-committee-passes-more-election-integrity-bills_4248710.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2022-02-01&utm_medium=email&est=vDfWsp9iCtgvgXmdoakm%2Fz%2F%2BhkXAQJprdaNwY9EyeGRJp7zGyHuyzmMzJdYq5Ni1tcfcQ5t35A%3D%3D
After all these years I still have yet to discern any real talent in this woman. She is just a big mouth that happens to be attached to a person with dark skin. Her exit from the public stage would be a blessing.
She can be funny. Some of the lines she’s handed are vulgar, but I wouldn’t assume she wasn’t herself in mundane life. See her performances in The Player and Jumpin Jack Flash (a generation ago, I know).
I think they hire the The View panel to be articulate and entertaining. If they make an incisive observation, that’s gravy. It’s not a requirement for the job.
This was pretty good:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlKQ5gglOsg
Like a lot of wealthy actors and actresses she got lazy and started just playing herself. Her role on Star Trek the Next Generation was one of the reason why that was my least favorite Trek until the advent of Star Trek Discovery and Picard.
Go to Twitter and tell @WhoopiGoldberg what you think.
https://twitter.com/Saul33102118/status/1488510990954213379
Let this diabolical woman know that we know she is a dirty filthy disgusting racist in the tradition of the Nazis and Fascists before her.
The View is an interesting look into the left-wing bubble. They seem to recognize the value in having a right-wing panelist, but in that left-wing way that you know they’d never consider having two. Maybe they only do it for the heat it generates, I don’t know, but they keep trying to do it. But I doubt they realize that their representatives for the left are like eight standard deviations from contemporary liberalism (which itself is farther to the left than anything we’ve seen in my lifetime).
Let this diabolical woman know that we know she is a dirty filthy disgusting racist in the tradition of the Nazis and Fascists before her.
She’s a somewhat vulgar comedian who likely doesn’t have any opinions which would be deemed unconventional in a certain social set.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuBd10H83Jw
Shame in her. I haven’t watched this garbage in years and doubt the other panellists took her to task.
She needs to be fired. (But they probably won’t because she is well-connected…)
*on
Pinky, if you haven’t seen Norm MacDonald’s appearance on the view you owe it to yourself to find it and watch it.
They attack him enough just for appearing with George Bush (though I’m sure that Barbara Walters hated him on principle). But Norm being Norm, he has to bring up Vince Foster…
Oh no.
This could be a false flag event.
Groundhog found dead.
Seems everything was fine yesterday and suddenly Arkincide on the hog.
We now know for certain that FBI informants close to the groundhog were celebrating last night at a varmint hangout near the red light district.
The hog was found in his Tesla, slumped over the steering wheel.
Here’s the spin;
https://www.fox5ny.com/news/weather-predicting-milltown-mel-dies-just-before-groundhog-day
Rudolph, I’ve seen it. It’s like he was playing a game of Chicken with someone who didn’t know it. They were like, who is this guy and why is he driving his car straight at me? (analogy: car=career)
They attack him enough just for appearing with George Bush (though I’m sure that Barbara Walters hated him on principle). But Norm being Norm, he has to bring up Vince Foster…
I never heard of this man until his obituaries appeared. Why would Barbara Walters hate a Canadian stand up comedian on principle? And what kind of comedy can you wring out of a middle-aged man with a wife and children committing suicide?
Norm MacDonald was a very intelligent comedian who would never back down, whether right or wrong (but usually right). He was the news anchor on Saturday Night Live during the OJ trial, and apparently one of the NBC execs was a friend of OJ and asked that the show not make fun of him. Norm turned the news segment into a non-stop OJ joke, and ended up getting fired.
So, on this one episode of The View, they tried to “joke” with Norm about politics. There was a nasty edge to it, and they’re nowhere near as smart as him. So he accused Clinton of killing Vince Foster and wouldn’t back down. It was the equivalent of setting off a stinkbomb and just sitting there. It was brutal.
So he accused Clinton of killing Vince Foster and wouldn’t back down. It was the equivalent of setting off a stinkbomb and just sitting there. It was brutal.
Why is that amusing? (It is, by the way, slanderous).
Half of Norm MacDonald is in the delivery. He’s the guy who told a “a moth wouldn’t leave the doctor’s office because the light was on” joke for over 3 minutes and still got the audience to crack up at the punchline. In this case he not only brought it up repeatedly but treated it like the most uncontroversial thing in the world (offhandedly mentioning “I’ll be glad to get all of the murder out of the White House” and saying “I thought it was a matter of public record!” when challenged.)
When he did Vince Foster jokes on SNL part of the joke was the implication that only a comedian like him could even bring up the possibility. (Similarly he did a lot of jokes about how OJ is guilty LONG before it became acceptable to say so in the media.) But on the View it was very clearly done due to how much the accusation clearly annoyed most of the panel and Barbara Walters in particular for purely political reasons.
(For the record Norm has said in interviews that he doesn’t really have firm opinions about what happened to Vince Foster. His comments in a Tom Green interview also clarify his motivations behind the View thing in the particular: he had previously attended an event with George W Bush, for no political reason but just because he thought it’d be cool to hang out with a presidential candidate. When he was when he arrived for filming before the show started they confronted him with a picture from that event as if it was something he had to apologize for. That annoyed him and he decided to react in a way that he knew would push their buttons in a way that they couldn’t respond to.)
He’s the guy who told a “a moth wouldn’t leave the doctor’s office because the light was on” joke for over 3 minutes and still got the audience to crack up at the punchline.
They must have heard something in that joke I didn’t.
When he did Vince Foster jokes on SNL part of the joke was the implication that only a comedian like him could even bring up the possibility. (Similarly he did a lot of jokes about how OJ is guilty LONG before it became acceptable to say so in the media.) But on the View it was very clearly done due to how much the accusation clearly annoyed most of the panel and Barbara Walters in particular for purely political reasons.
No clue when it was ‘unacceptable’ to tell jokes about OJ Simplson. Not long after he was convicted, New York magazine had a cover story on him slicing him up.
I have no clue why you fancy Barbara Walters would be annoyed for ‘purely political reasons’. Why couldn’t she be annoyed because it was horse-pucky and disrespectful to his family?
Not long after he was acquitted.
You can watch the View episode if you want; it’s easy enough to find. It’s not hard at all to see that Barbara and the others are annoyed not only at Norm acting like an idiot (which is what he said he was doing later) but that he was specifically attacking the Clintons. Even when he’s not alluding to the Vince Foster thing any time he mentions the Clintons there’s a visible hatred. It’s not like they’re just against being mean in general considering the whole thing started with them trashing George W Bush (who it should be remembered wasn’t even president at that point.)
He started doing OJ Simpson jokes from basically the beginning of the trial, maybe before. It’s kind of fascinating to watch audience reactions in compilations. Early on he barely gets any support. On the day of the verdict his line of “This just in: Murder is now legal in the state of California!” gets one of the biggest positive reactions I’ve ever seen on SNL.
Oh, Art Art Art Art Art. He just said that half of it is in the delivery.
We know, Art. If there’s one thing we know, it’s that you have no sense of humor.
The good comedians have the ability to push the boundaries of political correctness and what’s taboo. That’s what makes them funny. It’s the “I can’t believe they said that” mixed with “I’m so glad they said what everyone was thinking but was too afraid to say it”. Good comedians can do this.
Whoopi Goldberg is not funny. She made some entertaining movies and has this unique androgynous look and quality about her. But I have never found her to be in the class of comedians who has that good timing and delivery. I think she smokes too much of her good stuff before breakfast.
Ezabelle: 👍👍
Whoopi S#£%.
Slap on the hand;
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/01/us/whoopi-goldberg-holocaust.html
there’s a visible hatred
From Barbara Walters? Not buying. If you said from Rosie O’Donnell, that would be plausible. (If I understand correctly, the regular panelists in that era were Meredith Vieira, Star Jones, Joy Behar, Elizabeth Hasselbeck, and Barbara Walters).
If there’s one thing we know, it’s that you have no sense of humor.
48 year old man with a wife and three children puts a bullet in his head. Ha ha ha.
… 48 year old man with a wife and three children puts a bullet in his head. Ha ha ha
… I don’t remember that part of the moth joke?
Of course, I wouldn’t hire Whoopi to comment on anything but say the Sun came up in the East this morning.
However, I do not agree with suspending her. Stupid is not a sin. And, this isn’t that much more stupider than anything else she’s ever uttered.
Art, by all accounts, you’d be better off alienating a cobra than Barbara Walters.
CAG, Art isn’t referring to the moth joke, he’s referring to the statement about Vince Foster. If Art would watch it, he’d see that it wasn’t intended as a joke, it was intended as a disruption.
They can suspend her for 2 weeks, but she will still be Whoopi when she comes back.
Art, by all accounts, you’d be better off alienating a cobra than Barbara Walters.
I think you’ve confused Barbara Walters with Mike Wallace and the 60 Minutes crew.
CAG, Art isn’t referring to the moth joke, he’s referring to the statement about Vince Foster. If Art would watch it, he’d see that it wasn’t intended as a joke, it was intended as a disruption.
Clown nose on, clown nose off.
… CAG, Art isn’t referring to the moth joke
I get that, Pinky, but it was the moth joke that he said wasn’t funny. Nate replied to that and Art switched it up to VF for some reason. I was subtly reminding him that no one here said the suicide of a husband and father was funny. It was the most hilarious moth joke that he said he didn’t find funny.
To each his own, really … just setting the record straight, and defending the perfectly presented moth joke. I mean, really! The host even interrupted Norm’s joke, and he still pulled it off! Genius!
If you want to know how the oppression hierarchy works out at the moment, consider the fact that a black woman was suspended at the beginning of Black History month and the New York Times is applauding.
CAG, I loved what Conan did with that. He was a great foil. If you didn’t like that, you’ll hate this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3LMSflEN54
I guess I’ll be in a minority, but cancel culture is bad, whether it’s on the right or left. Let. the market act: if you don’t like what Whoopi says, don’t watch the program. Moreover, (and I’m speaking as a converted secular Jew), the Holocaust was not about race. it was about what the Nazi’s call race, but is not. And there were gypsies and Catholics killed also. And I believe in her remarks Whoopie said the Holocaust was a terrible thing to happen. Let’s put our anger where it’s justified.
People, Whoopi has done worse than this:
Doesn’t anyone remember her defense of Roman Polanski drugging and raping an underage girl with the line “It wasn’t rape rape”?
Whoopi defends a Polish-Jewish filmmaker against charges of raping an underage girl and no one blinks.
Whoopi says that there was no racism against the Jews and she gets suspended.
It’s mysterious what could be the determining factor of what makes a statement acceptable or not.
Well she’ll keep getting away with her comments and opinion as long as she is allowed. These opinions end up controlling the collective narrative. That’s the dangerous slippery slope we have created.
It’s mysterious what could be the determining factor of what makes a statement acceptable or not.
If you think that’s the only objectionable thing she’s said….
Whoopi’s “thing” is that she says exactly what is normal for her social circle.
On broadcast TV.
The difference is that, this time, it was embarrassing.
Because, by their definitions, she is absolutely not wrong.
Remember the “Holocaust survivors have White Privilege” thing?
Remember how they redefined racism to be only possible if you are in a position of power– and whatever the term they demand for black this week can never be a position of power?
What she said EMBARASSED them, especially since it was during a push that’s built on using the Holocaust (the “censoring Maus by not using it as the only document for teaching 8th graders about the Holocaust” faux-outrage)– the ADL even changed their definition of racism again, to something that’s actually almost like the original “treating different because of believed ancestry.”
Doesn’t anyone remember her defense of Roman Polanski drugging and raping an underage girl with the line “It wasn’t rape rape”?
She drew a distinction between statutory rape and forcible rape. She thought it was statutory rape because that’s to what he pleaded guilty in the plea bargain. She likely wasn’t aware that he’d drugged her and sodomized her while she was helpless.
Art,
Of course, that’s because the left almost always gets away with their half truths, which, in fact, are lies.
If she was unaware of what happened with Roman Polanski it’s only because she was willingly aware. People in Hollywood talk.
It’s like all the people who claim that no one had any idea about what was happening with Harvey Weinstein, despite people making jokes about it for years. Maybe they didn’t know the full extent of what was happening, but if so it’s only because they intentionally didn’t look into it for fear of what they would find.
But beyond that, just imagine any moderately conservative figure defending a rape on the grounds “it was only statutory rape!” That hypothetical conservative would be condemned on all sides and forced out of his career even by other conservatives. (Heck, that can happen even when a conservative says something that isn’t even false or morally objectionable, like saying that mothers who choose to abort their babies are murderers.)
But beyond that, just imagine any moderately conservative figure defending a rape on the grounds “it was only statutory rape!”
When did she defend his conduct?
If she was unaware of what happened with Roman Polanski it’s only because she was willingly aware. People in Hollywood talk.
She was talking about a criminal case which had been in proceedings 30 years earlier. She could have easily forgotten details or never learned the precise details. I remembered Polanski had been convicted of statutory rape but don’t recall ever reading about the gory details. What the news stories I remember emphasized was the age of the youngster involved. And she wasn’t in Hollywood in 1977; she was an ordinary person living in San Diego.
It’s like all the people who claim that no one had any idea about what was happening with Harvey Weinstein, despite people making jokes about it for years. Maybe they didn’t know the full extent of what was happening, but if so it’s only because they intentionally didn’t look into it for fear of what they would find.
It’s like all the people who claim that no one had any idea about what was happening with Harvey Weinstein, despite people making jokes about it for years. Maybe they didn’t know the full extent of what was happening, but if so it’s only because they intentionally didn’t look into it for fear of what they would find.
That’s an invalid analogy.