Remember When

 

 

 

Avenatti could have gotten 40 years.  The Judge, a Bush 43 appointee, gave him a shockingly light 30 months, supposedly because he expressed remorse for his crimes.  I have been at hundreds of criminal sentencings over the past 39 years, and I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen a criminal defendant not express remorse.  Avenatti was an attorney, and he knew precisely what he was doing.  He should have received at least a decade.  However, this does not end his legal troubles by a long shot, due to his charming habit of allegedly stealing from clients.  This was the man being touted as a candidate for the Presidency less than three years ago because Orange Man Bad.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dale Price
Dale Price
Friday, July 9, AD 2021 8:28am

The judge went too light, but he appeared to be angry that well-connected Democratic insider Mark Geragos wasn’t even charged by the DO”J” for his deep involvement in Avenatti’s extortion attempt.

That’s a reasonable point, and simply shows the two-tier federal prosecution system in action. Avenatti does (too little, admittedly) time, Geragos struts around, bulletproof because of his connections.

Art Deco
Art Deco
Friday, July 9, AD 2021 8:56am

Judges should not have discretion over sentencing. As for federal prosecutors, fire every last one of them and screen potential replacements with the MMPI.

Scroll to Top