News that I missed, courtesy of The Babylon Bee:
PLYMOUTH, MA — After seventeen hours of deliberations over the span of three days, a jury was still struggling to decide whether murder is wrong.
The deep nuances of the case delayed the decision, with jurors facing intricate legal and moral questions such as whether it’s fine to methodically strangle your own kids one by one.
“Oof. This is a toughie,” said Juror number seven, reviewing the facts of the case. “There’s so much to consider here, like if luring children down into a basement to murder them is bad. I’m really at a loss here.”
According to anonymous sources, the jury had concluded that squeezing the life out of a puppy while it desperately struggled to breathe was bad, but they were not yet sure if that applied to humans. “We are pretty confident that choking puppies to death is wrong,” said an anonymous juror. “If they are your own children, and you’re not feeling good, maybe it’s okay. We just don’t know. Agh, this is hard!”
Go here to read the rest. Most people have been surprised and alarmed at the support voiced, and excuses made, for this murderess of her children. I am not. With one of the two major parties vigorously supporting abortion up to birth as a right if not a rite, the murdering of children outside the womb is a very small step morally and logically. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind is the Scriptural admonition which sums up our time.
The last thing they saw in this world was their mother murdering them. Jesus wept.
