Language advisory to the above video. The only reason we don’t have national voter ID is because Democrats routinely cheat in close elections and everyone knows it.
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
The photo ID is one issue. Other issues are the accumulation of relict entries on local voter rolls, the promiscuous use of postal ballots, the continuing tabulation of postal ballots after election day concludes (acceptable in some circumstances, not most), the gratuitous use of information technology, especially networked devices, the insufficient number of voting precincts, and slapdash staffing of voting precincts. Another issue the discombobulated electoral calendar. State legislators cannot repair anything to save their lives. The reaction of street-level Democrats to a recitation of these issues is to ignore you, lie, and play DARVO cards.
Lead kindly light
Sunday, July 19, AD 2026 7:49am
And have done so forever. When I was a young person before I could vote I remember hearing discussions about how South Texas gave the election to Kennedy in 1960.
That eventually led to the disaster that was LBJ
Last edited 9 hours ago by Lead kindly light
Art Deco
Sunday, July 19, AD 2026 9:25am
Both Kennedy and LBJ had high approval ratings per Gallup and the Democrats acquired a large advantage in Congress in 1964. (William Scranton might have improved a tad on Barry Goldwater’s vote totals – or not). The Democratic Party had its moment in 1964 and you cannot attribute that to shenanigans in Illinois or Texas in 1960. One persistent hangover has been the 10-to-1 majorities Democrats retain among blacks, something you did not see with voting blacks prior to that.
David WS
Sunday, July 19, AD 2026 9:44am
waiting standing in line to vote.. an immigrant (noticeable) husband and wife produced their IDs to vote.. the woman steering persons towards the voting booths said “oh.. you don’t need that!” and the husband God Bless him… was visibly perplexed and angry-
Josh
Sunday, July 19, AD 2026 9:52am
I’ve had that same experience in the People’s Democratic Republic of Maryland – ready to show ID and I was told they had to take it on faith that I was who I said I was. Very easy when you have a number of precincts for a swarm of locusts, er, cheaters, er, “voters” to move from place to place to assume identities to vote.
Icefalcon
Sunday, July 19, AD 2026 4:28pm
Here in Chicago, they REFUSE to look at ID, even if you’re early voting. I served as an election judge (R) in 2012. Never again. At the mandatory training session, the Board of Elections guy told us that if the person’s signature did not match the facsimile on file, “don’t worry about it, you not (sic) the FBI!” Too many holes in the system. Shady fellow judges and all in all, an unsettling experience. Trump’s claims about fraud ring true.
Art Deco
Sunday, July 19, AD 2026 5:14pm
One other thing. The League of Women Voters and Common Cause are all in on practices which promote fraud. There really are no liberalish organizations not part of the Democratic Party borg creature.
The photo ID is one issue. Other issues are the accumulation of relict entries on local voter rolls, the promiscuous use of postal ballots, the continuing tabulation of postal ballots after election day concludes (acceptable in some circumstances, not most), the gratuitous use of information technology, especially networked devices, the insufficient number of voting precincts, and slapdash staffing of voting precincts. Another issue the discombobulated electoral calendar. State legislators cannot repair anything to save their lives. The reaction of street-level Democrats to a recitation of these issues is to ignore you, lie, and play DARVO cards.
And have done so forever. When I was a young person before I could vote I remember hearing discussions about how South Texas gave the election to Kennedy in 1960.
That eventually led to the disaster that was LBJ
Both Kennedy and LBJ had high approval ratings per Gallup and the Democrats acquired a large advantage in Congress in 1964. (William Scranton might have improved a tad on Barry Goldwater’s vote totals – or not). The Democratic Party had its moment in 1964 and you cannot attribute that to shenanigans in Illinois or Texas in 1960. One persistent hangover has been the 10-to-1 majorities Democrats retain among blacks, something you did not see with voting blacks prior to that.
waiting standing in line to vote.. an immigrant (noticeable) husband and wife produced their IDs to vote.. the woman steering persons towards the voting booths said “oh.. you don’t need that!” and the husband God Bless him… was visibly perplexed and angry-
I’ve had that same experience in the People’s Democratic Republic of Maryland – ready to show ID and I was told they had to take it on faith that I was who I said I was. Very easy when you have a number of precincts for a swarm of locusts, er, cheaters, er, “voters” to move from place to place to assume identities to vote.
Here in Chicago, they REFUSE to look at ID, even if you’re early voting. I served as an election judge (R) in 2012. Never again. At the mandatory training session, the Board of Elections guy told us that if the person’s signature did not match the facsimile on file, “don’t worry about it, you not (sic) the FBI!” Too many holes in the system. Shady fellow judges and all in all, an unsettling experience. Trump’s claims about fraud ring true.
One other thing. The League of Women Voters and Common Cause are all in on practices which promote fraud. There really are no liberalish organizations not part of the Democratic Party borg creature.