PopeWatch: Rupnik

 

 

 

While the Pope is perhaps nearing the end of his reign, his pontificate continues on the path he has chosen for it:

The question is: why here? And above all, why did Rupnik settle here, an hour’s drive from Rome, after leaving the Jesuit order and joining the Slovenian diocese of Koper? Don Milan also tells us that he is a diocesan priest, but not from this diocese, instead of Sabina-Poggio Mirteto.

In fact, the convent of Montefiolo was already a well-known place, frequented by the people of the Aletti Centre, who organised retreats in a large wing of the huge building called the “House of the Resurrection”. And the man behind the scenes is Cardinal Angelo De Donatis, former Vicar General of His Holiness for the Diocese of Rome and now Major Penitentiary. It is no secret that the Cardinal is Rupnik’s great protector, and that in illo tempore he dismissed as slander the numerous and detailed accusations that emerged against the former Slovenian Jesuit, even going so far as to issue a ridiculous note praising the impeccable reality of the Aletti Centre, while Rupnik’s victims demanded truth and justice.

Moreover, De Donatis is at home in Montefiolo, where he has built a two-storey house on the nuns’ property (‘a beautiful apartment’, according to those who have seen it in the village), renovating and converting a building that the nuns used to park their vehicles in, on the slope overlooking the valley towards Mount Soratte. And then, in the nearby village of Poggio Catino, the Cardinal also owns a former farmhouse with a swimming pool, where it seems he had accommodated Rupnik & Co. until they could be incorporated into Montefiolo.

Meanwhile, in the convent church, all hell seems to be breaking loose. A house protected by the Fine Arts, is being literally turned upside down by the group. They are painting the entire church, which has an external entrance. And then, in the old part of the monastery, an ancient hermitage where San Felice da Cantalice lived as a hermit: they are painting that too,’ an informant tells us. He continues: For years, nothing could be done because permission was needed, but now, in no time at all, they have built a wall where the two steps to the altar used to be, and they have frescoed it’.

But also the poor nuns are having a hard time. They are practically hostage to Cardinal De Donatis and Rupnik’s group, and are prohibited from opening the convent to visitors. While searching for more information in the village of Casperia, we learn that the nuns, who were once very present in the town and also renowned for the quality of their embroidery, disappeared some time ago and nothing more is known about them. We were also given the personal telephone number of one of the sisters with the suggestion that we ask to buy some of the honey they produce as a ruse to gain access to the convent. We try: ‘It’s not possible,’ the nun replied in a frightened tone, ‘they don’t want us to let anyone in.’ ‘They don’t want us to? Who doesn’t want it?’ we asked, laying our cards on the table. ‘Cardinal De Donatis? Don Rupnik?’ The nun is clearly too frightened at this point: ‘I don’t know anything, I have to go to mass now’. She hangs up.

It’s not difficult to understand her fear because the Cardinal, we don’t know on what basis, is in charge of the financial management of the religious institute. In fact, we are told, the Cardinal is also in charge of the property in San Felice Circeo, at the foot of the Morrone hill, donated to the nuns by Cavaliere Carlo Selbmann. In short, for the nuns, De Donatis is the boss who decides everything.

The result is that the Cardinal is the director of the new arrangement that permits Rupnik and the small group that left the Society of Jesus to occupy a property that does not belong to him, but in which he has made a home and which he manages as if it were his own. Since he himself was unable to incardinate Rupnik in the diocese of Rome, which was certainly too much in the limelight after the media scandal, a bishop was sought and found in Monsignor Jurij Bizjak (noe replaced by Peter Štumpf), who was willing to perform a purely formal incardination and then let Rupnik form a new community and continue his artistic activities. Above all, De Donatis had no objection to putting Rupnik back in direct contact with nuns after all that had come to light. And defying the cardinal’s wrath (yes, we also hear that sparks are flying between the sisters and De Donatis) could also cause problems that the elderly sisters, some of whom are in wheelchairs, are not in a position to face.

Go here to read the rest.

 

5 1 vote
Article Rating
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John F. Kennedy
John F. Kennedy
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 5:36am

Shocking but no surprise.

Frank
Frank
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 6:24am

Evil follows Rupnik wherever he goes. Wonder why? /sarcasm off.

And yet, Frank Pavone remains laicized for upsetting an arrogant bishop. As do all the other priests canceled by this regime for being too traditional and having the temerity to preach it.

Usquequo, Domine?

Blessed Mother, please protect your Sisters from these monsters.

Art Deco
Art Deco
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 7:09am

Recall Fr. Paul Shaughnessy’s way of sussing out transgressors. Do an inventory of a rectory and the priests’ side activities. You see a full liquor cabinet, slick magazines, and trips out of town during the week, you can wager their life of chastity is in disorder. It was Fr. Shaugnessy’s view that a regime of ascetical practices would clean out the troublesome characters in the seminaries and the priesthood. GJM vad den Aardweg, the Dutch psychologist and public critic of homosexuality has said that one of the signatures of male homosexuality is an abnormal love of comfort. The scandals which have erupted over bishops building handsome retirement homes for themselves are indicia of homosexuality in the higher clergy.

Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 7:38am

Art Deco is 100% correct.

The Bruised Optimist
The Bruised Optimist
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 7:57am

Priesthood should be difficult. It is service. When it is sweet, the reason should be the love between Master and servant.
Those who make the life sweet though licit and illicit pleasures focus on the wrong place.

They are like the date who wants to go out with you because of where you go, instead of because she is going there *with you*.

Madgalene
Madgalene
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 10:13am

The evil coming from the Vatican is almost beyond comprehension. May God, in His mercy, grant us a Catholic, strong, and holy next pope. May he request, first of all, a paper of resignation of ALL Cardinals immediately and then decide who stays and who goes. Then on the bishops. How the Church needs a cleaning.

Ezabelle
Ezabelle
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 1:17pm

I’m surprised there isn’t one good cleric who has the courage to say or do something in defence of these nuns to ensure their safety. Why are they being put in this position? How infuriating.

Ezabelle
Ezabelle
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 1:35pm

I think the mentality of soft priests has been aided by this idea by members of the community and society at large who take pity on the vocation as one of sacrifice and loneliness and compare it to another job or profession.

That the poor priest has sacrificed so much, has to be away from family and give up his life and basically go through life not owning anything, working without anything material to show for it, always being on call for members of his community… Basically it’s compared to a job rather than a calling from God.

So consequently, lay people accept and excuse any level of comfort afforded to the priest and sometime aid in that comfort through social invitations or “pampering” their Parish Priest.

The beautify of the vocation IS the sacrifice and loneliness and struggle.

It’s the modern western mentality that has diluted the understanding of the vocation because society tells us suffering and sacrifice is of no value or purpose and should be avoided.

Bill
Bill
Tuesday, March 4, AD 2025 1:42pm

Can we get a DOGE in the Vatican?

trackback
Wednesday, March 5, AD 2025 10:10am

[…] News Stories on Big Pulpit:1. The Bergolian Captivity – Unknown Centurion at Catholic Stand2. PopeWatch: Rupnik – Donald R. McClarey, J.D., at The American Catholic3. Ukrainian Bishop: Why are Russians […]

SouthCoast
SouthCoast
Wednesday, March 5, AD 2025 1:14pm

Magdalena, whenever a new mayor was elected in the Major Metropolis for which I worked, it was mandatory that all Department heads and other appointees outside Civil Service submit their written resignations. A sifting of wheat and chaff followed. Would be a good Best Practice for the Church. Depending, of course, on the new Pope.
Come to think of it, though, now that I think of it, it’s probably a really bad idea. Alas.

Scroll to Top