Snowflake Revolution
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
Minny’s special pie is on it’s way for you.
Not ready for Prime Time news reports;
Ivy League protester, in a heroic act of charity, threatened to cancel her manicure appointment in the hope that the plight of Hamas be awakened in every heart.
Eat some pie, sympathizers. An October 7th event coming to your campus might be in your foreseeable future. God forbid.
What would you say then?
Teddy…. bares all;
https://nypost.com/2023/12/09/news/israeli-soldiers-find-teddy-bear-stuffed-with-rifle-ammo-in-gaza/
2nd Thessalonians 3:10.
For even when we were with you, we gave you this command: Anyone unwilling to work should not eat.
—–
Starve, witch, starve! (Being a submarine sailor, I would have replaced the “w” with a “b”.)
“Please don’t make me suffer the foreseeable consequences of my own stupid LARPing.”
You are occupiers. By your own definition, you may be treated abominably, outside even the usual restraints of war. We will not do that though, for we do not believe what you believe.
Give them nothing in justice, but If mercy demands something, let it be nothing but kosher matzoh and water.
Give the rotters pub curry and stewed prunes. That’ll move ’em.
We seem to have a good bit of both in the tragedy category these days. Must be some sort of catch up going on.
[…] – New Lines MagThe Jeffersonian Ideal – Michael Lucchese at Law & LibertySnowflake Revolution – Donald R. McClarey, Esq., at The American CatholicThe Breathtaking Denial of Anti-Semitism […]
The obvious result of having parents who always made sure that she got a participation trophy and that she never heard the word “No.”
She is a PhD student named Johannah King-Slutzky
Her Bio:
My dissertation is on fantasies of limitless energy in the transatlantic Romantic imagination from 1760-1860. My goal is to write a prehistory of metabolic rift, Marx’s term for the disruption of energy circuits caused by industrialization under capitalism. I am particularly interested in theories of the imagination and poetry as interpreted through a Marxian lens in order to update and propose an alternative to historicist ideological critiques of the Romantic imagination. Prior to joining Columbia, I worked as a political strategist for leftist and progressive causes and remain active in the higher education labor movement.
You can’t make this stuff up!
My dissertation is on fantasies of limitless energy in the transatlantic Romantic imagination from 1760-1860. My goal is to write a prehistory of metabolic rift, Marx’s term for the disruption of energy circuits caused by industrialization under capitalism.
I’d almost swear she used a woke version of Mad Libs to write her bio.
Thanks for the laugh – Have they not heard of UberEats, DoorDash…
She’s apparently the daughter of Mitchell R. Slutzky, PsyD and Beth King. The address associated with her mother is a country residence about 40 miles south of Greensboro, NC. That with her father is an apartment on Central Park West. Only one of the 114 units in Dr. Slutzky’s building is currently being offered for rent. I imagine being a 68 year old man with two children past 30, he has one of the smaller units, not the 4 bedroom unit for which the owners expect a monthly rent of $19,000. Dr. Slutzky appears to have retired from some conglomerate in 2020 and now just sees patients privately.
Ha!!! 😀
Good find CAG.
-funny
Fordham dealt with Lincoln Center rag-tags promptly and efficiently. My grandson is there, and has reported on the police arresting potential occupiers (most of whom were not Fordham students.) There’s also a good letter out by the Fordham president, a model for how to deal with this situation.
Here’s the letter the Fordham president sent out to the community:
Dear Fordham Community,
This morning, the wave of protests and encampments spreading across the country came to our campus at Lincoln Center. Several dozen people pushed inside the lobby of the Lowenstein building and set up tents. After threats of conduct sanctions, most left. The remaining protesters refused to identify themselves or whether they were members of our community. After several warnings, NYPD arrested fifteen people for misdemeanor trespassing. We believe some of those were Fordham students.
I know that many of you have strong opinions about these events, from the war in Gaza to the attacks on Israel, from the value of free speech to the sometimes disruptive and threatening nature of protests. I want you to know that we take both the passion and the safety of our students very seriously.
Before today, the handful of protests we have experienced have been peaceful, mostly teach-ins and prayer vigils. We met with student leaders as recently as yesterday, readily agreeing to allow them to present their case about divestment and transparency to trustees and our chief investment officer. We remain committed to that process.
Today was different. We draw the line at intrusions into a classroom building, especially by people who are not members of our community. (There is a difference between free speech and people barging into your home to shout.) Outside of Lowenstein, hundreds of protesters came from elsewhere, drawn by social media invitations to support the few protesters on the other side of the window. The growing crowd outside banged on the glass so violently we worried they would break it. We worried that the protesters would rush further into campus.
This decision was not about parsing the difference between protected political speech and threats, nor was it about the Middle East. This was only about the physical protection of the campus. It comes down to this: Fordham students have a right to feel safe and to finish their exams. Period.
We remain eager to engage with our student activists and to have open-hearted conversations. We have found them to be thoughtful and focused on persuasion. But we can only have those conversations when we have secured our campus and made our community feel safe.
Know that we have increased security at both campuses, to strengthen the walls and gates that allow us to avoid outside intrusion at this moment. And also know that we remain committed to permitting peaceful protests that still allow the rest of our student body to continue their studies.
With fervent prayers for peace,
President Tetlow
Slutzky…hmm…that sounds like a Jewish surname?
The problem with these snotty-faced brats is they would sell their own mother for 15minutes of attention. The students and University should put forward a class action lawsuit against these individuals for the disruption they caused during their exams and for being subject to behaviour that could lead to violence from protestors. Slutzy and her minions need to be taught a lesson.
Interesting to note that Gov Newsome had strong words for the protestors. Those who trespass, or are violent or are breaking laws will be dealt with. Or words to that effect.
Didn’t really think Pretty Boy had it in him. We’ll see if this is followed through. Of course he is hoping to live in the White House. His statement was quite different from meally mouthed Biden.