Friday, May 17, AD 2024 2:18am

Thought For The Day

John LeFevre
@JohnLeFevre
I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother’s (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It’s hard to find on Google, so here’s what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed “inadmissible” by the judge: –
She couldn’t recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened –
She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality –
The dress she claims to have been wearing didn’t exist at the time –
Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible –
Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman –
Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed –
Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her “favorite shows”) –
Trump’s Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows –
She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves –
She told Anderson Cooper, “most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies.” –
She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
The case should never have reached a jury either time.  Carroll lacked sufficient evidence to meet her burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt.  The Judge and the Juries were on a vengeance ride against Trump and these trials had as much to do with Justice as the Salem witch trials.  In the second trial it didn’t help that Trump was represented by a very pretty, and utterly incompetent, attorney.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CAM
CAM
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 3:46am

$83 M! More votes for The Donald. Verdict should be overturned by the appeal.

Philip Nachazel
Philip Nachazel
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 3:51am

One look at her and celibacy becomes realistic.

What a shake-down and political theater rolled into one. Ouch, 80 some million $. Some of that money was awarded to help restore her reputation. I didn’t know a box of condoms was so expensive.

Philip Nachazel
Philip Nachazel
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 7:14am

The Adult Survivors Act

… little know factoid.. cough 😷…

Any adult who survives the Biden years is entitled to a free Go Brandon tee shirt/ MAGA hat combo.

Frank
Frank
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 7:18am

As Donald notes, a real judge would have directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s case. I hope the incompetent trial lawyer at least knew how to make a record for appeal. Not that I put much stock in the notion of any NY appellate court actually applying the law of evidence where DJT is concerned, but you can’t win if you don’t try.

The Bruised Optimist
The Bruised Optimist
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 8:30am

$83 million well spent.

Anybody who doesn’t listen primarily to fake news sees this as just one more swampy broken part of the system. If some unsupportable claim can land a blow on a man with access to good lawyers, how much more emperiled am I by some unbalanced and unscrupulous accuser?

This wins more genuine support than $83 million of TV ads or bumper stickers.

Kevin R
Kevin R
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 9:06am

How was she incompetent? Please give specifics. Are you saying she did not make a proper record for purposes of an appeal? Why did first attorney not represent Trump in the second trial?

CAG
CAG
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 11:08am

Trump was represented by a very pretty, and utterly incompetent, attorney.”

This seems to be quite often the case with Trump.

L. V.
L. V.
Sunday, January 28, AD 2024 2:44pm

Unfortunately, LeFevre’s mother–and voters like her–are the entire point of the exercise. They’ll see the headlines, never look any deeper, and turn against Trump on that basis.

J. Ronald Parrish
J. Ronald Parrish
Monday, January 29, AD 2024 12:19am

The standard the plaintiff had to reach in this case was “by a preponderance of the evidence “, not “beyond a reasonable doubt “. Either way she failed. As long as Trump’s fate is left up to juries in New York and Washington, he will loose. We now have an officially corrupt judicial system. As long as this situation persists, it will not matter who his lawyer is.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top