I do them all the time for women at the Law Mines. Sometime I do them for men who are eager to pay child support and to have visitation rights. These used to be called Bastardy Proceedings and dated back to colonial America. The Law has long maintained that support should be provided by the father if paternity could be established. With DNA testing the old guess work has been eliminated. The raw ignorance of people who pontificate on subjects they obviously know nothing about never ceases to amuse me.
It’s Called a Paternity Case Honey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 41 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
I decided to look up the source:
https://notthebee.com/article/a-pro-abortion-writer-has-proposed-a-way-to-end-abortion-and-it-sounds-suspiciously-likemarriage
Oh it gets so much better. From the feminist in question:
“If you are anti-choice and you want to make sure women carry every pregnancy to term, why not make the person who created the pregnancy contribute?” (emphasis mine)
And her followup tweet:
“P.S. I recognize that there will be limitations and exceptions to this, including whether a woman wants to have this man—perhaps her rapist—in her life forever. But I just wanted to share this idea of burden sharing, at least economically.”
Now I know it’s been awhile since I went to school, but I could swear back then women had some choice in their pregnancy too. But then I do have a screenshot of a tweet where someone said, “I wish we could choose our baby daddies.” Apparently pregnancy is like COVID, just floating in the air and anybody could catch it any time.
I was pro-abortion some 30 years ago, and I freely admit that taxes had a lot (almost all?) to do with it. I even knew a fellw college girl (she was married, but not old enough I could call her a “woman”) and she told me she and her husband got pregnant because it gave them access to more welfare monies/services.
.
Professional pro-lifers are making a huge mistake calling more welfare dollars to women (even married couples) “pro-life” policies. Gov’t money tends to taint that which it touches. We already have some politicans supporting birth limits in this country–including a fellow who took the novel approach to submit a bill to have men ungo vasectomies (supposedly a “parody” piece of legislation).
.
Since so many in this country are pro-vaccine mandate, a tubal ligation-mandate for those on welfare should not be that hard of a sell.
Original thought isn’t the trademark of her type. Typical shock commentator trying to stay relevant. Looked her up and she has written some vile tweets and tabloid hit-style articles in the past- one of which caused her to be fired on the spot. Another angry feminist. Yawn.