A loving, religious wife and mother who is also a brilliant jurist. With her the old fashioned virtues of family and faith seem not so old fashioned. If she were a character in a novel, I can imagine an editor red penning her as unrealistic, Republican wish fulfillment. I do like reading novels, but the best stories are always in history. History does not proceed in an even pace. Some years have more history than can seem to fit in them, and 2020 is one of such years. I have called this the year of punishment. With Judge Barrett perhaps the Author of History, out of His mercy, is beginning to propel us to a more propitious time. Let us hope and pray.
Why the Democrats in the Senate Fear Judge Barrett
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
I’m not sure they fear her. The partisan Democrats I encounter have no procedural principles – they want what they want – nor do they have the capacity to make (or appreciate) and argument which isn’t a stew of motivated reasoning. They also carry with them the charming assumption that everything they see is their property. So, you hear this meme that the Republicans ‘stole’ a seat from Barack Obama by ignoring his nomination of Merrick Garland. Garland was treated perfectly courteously and the Republicans were under no obligation to approve his nomination, but the childish dweebs didn’t get what they wanted and that to them is intolerable.
I still wonder what the Democratic-media complex has up their sleeve. I think they’ll be more inhibited about generating a smear campaign against her than they were against Brett Kavanaugh; also, she’s a more elusive target than was Sarah Palin.
Still, you never know. As men of 53 go, Brett Kavanaugh was as clean as a hound’s tooth, but the media manages to find an a**hole he shared a dormitory suite with for a four month period at the end of 1983 to issue denunciations of him on CNN and the Senator from Rhode Island is pleased to beclown himself parsing the man’s gag yearbook entries from 35 years past, and they all pretend a woman who can present no evidence she ever met him makes a credible witness.
I wonder if they feel jealous of her wholeness and intellect v. fear?
[ If she was only a Democrat ]
I believe she’s viewed as detestable in their eyes because she’s as close to untouchable as they come.
Any attack on her character, unless it is completely provable with mounds of evidence, is ultimately going to backfire on the accuser…so they hate her.
Virtue of another spells hate and jealousy from the crowd whose platform protects vice, sexual deviancy and murder of the innocents. Amy helps to represent the opposite platform and because of that natural beauty, compassion and intelligence the only question the left has is WHY.
Why can’t she be more like us, liberal.
The Blasie-Ford accusations against Kavanaugh are an open festering wound that the left is still suffering from, self inflicted. They must realize that they can’t throw a weak accusation against Amy.
The party of death is jealous.
The fear of loosing control is most certainly a fear they have. The holy grail of the left, RvW, is slowly dissolving before their eyes.
What’s next, they might ask?
Prayers in public schools! [ gasp gasp. ]
The Blasie-Ford accusations against Kavanaugh are an open festering wound that the left is still suffering from, self inflicted.
I don’t think they’re suffering at all. They just stop talking about it. We have not one partisan Democrat in our social circle willing to acknowledge what’s plain-as-the-nose-on-your-face: that someone who cannot present any evidence she ever met the two men she accuses is not a credible witness. Recall that Bezos and Sulzberger minions rummaged around Alabama and found a woman who had three dates with Roy Moore in 1979, trolled enough cash through the trailer park to find two other women to make not-credible claims they had dates with Roy Moore, and found some other shmuck to claim Moore was (40 years ago) on a list of people banned from some mall (which beggars belief and was contradicted by the retired manager of the mall). They couldn’t manage that level of smear-mongering against Kavanaugh; they couldn’t come up with one person to attest that Christine Blasey had ever been in the same room with Brett Kavanaugh or Mark Judge, nor could they present an argument from circumstance that it was at all likely that they’d ever met (other than all three lived in the same very populous suburban county). The only acknowledgement from Democrats at any level that Christine Blasey was full-of-it was when they shifted gears to making an issue of his drinking habits; then they roll out James Roche, a man who met BK in August of 1983 and hadn’t spoken to him since January of 1984 and is damaged enough to be angry about 35 year old inter-personal disputes for which he was partly responsible.
If the lying sacs of excrement ever come up with something real, no one will believe it.
It’s the same as their lies about Donald J. Trump disrespecting WWI GI graves in Belgium, and Russia, and tax returns, and Kavanaugh, and, . . .
Clarissa Explains It All: “They hate Judge Barrett like Satan hates Holy Water.”
Re: The Kavanaugh inquisition: likely it cost (four seats) the despicable Dems the Senate in 2018. Thank God!
Does anyone think the lying, baby-murdering imbeciles learned their lesson?
“They stopped talking about it.”
Yes. Point well taken. Conscience is a funny thing. Why form it when it only serves the will of the one you despise. When it’s self serving than it’s easy to dismiss the tomfoolery and not care about trashing the reputation of a good man.
Question.
Did Christine Blasey ever solidify a book deal….ya know…high fiction?
Did Christine Blasey ever solidify a book deal….ya know…high fiction?
She got quite a haul from a Go Fund Me account IIRC. No need to produce a scandal book. She and her publisher would have put herself in serious danger of a libel suit. I doubt Kavanaugh would have pursued one, but Mark Judge might have. NB, public statements in support of her were signed by her husband’s family, but not by her family. Her husband has to know she lied, and he may have told her ‘no more’.
Thanks Art.
If her husband said, no more, she would be wise to listen to him much more than she did before the maneuver.
Blood thirsty Feinstein didn’t help matters.
Actually the democrats would be in opposition to almost anyone who appeared to advocate for an enhanced role for individual responsibility, They worship at the alter of statism and though they condemn Putin and Xi, they are quietly envious of their dictatorial ways at achieving their goals without having to justify to the people.