Two frequent targets of Kipling’s ire over the years was Kaiser Wilhelm, who Kipling viewed as a buffoon and a menace long before World War I, and anything that smacked of socialism. In the poem An Imperial Rescript (1890), Kipling got to attack both his bête noirs when the Kaiser unveiled a program of social reform to “help” working men. I rather think the Kaiser’s heart was in the right place on this occasion, even if his head was not. Kipling viewed the plan as rubbish since most men, the acolytes of Alfred. P Doolittle (see video above) excepted, work for the well-being of their families, a well-being that he thought governments would prove ill-equipped to preserve, and therefore they would work as hard as they were able for the wife and the kids. It is an arguable point, although Kipling’s view is directly contrary to what passes for the common wisdom of our day, which could mean that Kipling might very well be correct!
Now this is the tale of the Council the German Kaiser decreed,
To ease the strong of their burden, to help the weak in their need,
He sent a word to the peoples, who struggle, and pant, and sweat,
That the straw might be counted fairly and the tally of bricks be set.
The Lords of Their Hands assembled; from the East and the West they drew --
Baltimore, Lille, and Essen, Brummagem, Clyde, and Crewe.
And some were black from the furnace, and some were brown from the soil,
And some were blue from the dye-vat; but all were wearied of toil.
And the young King said: -- "I have found it, the road to the rest ye seek:
The strong shall wait for the weary, the hale shall halt for the weak:
With the even tramp of an army where no man breaks from the line,
Ye shall march to peace and plenty in the bond of brotherhood -- sign!"
The paper lay on the table, the strong heads bowed thereby,
And a wail went up from the peoples: -- "Ay, sign -- give rest, for we die!"
A hand was stretched to the goose-quill, a fist was cramped to scrawl,
When -- the laugh of a blue-eyed maiden ran clear through the Council-hall.
And each one heard Her laughing as each one saw Her plain --
Saidie, Mimi, or Olga, Gretchen, or Mary Jane.
And the Spirit of Man that is in Him to the light of the vision woke;
And the men drew back from the paper, as a Yankee delegate spoke: --
"There's a girl in Jersey City who works on the telephone;
We're going to hitch our horses and dig for a house of our own,
With gas and water connections, and steam-heat through to the top;
And, W. Hohenzollern, I guess I shall work till I drop."
And an English delegate thundered: -- "The weak an' the lame be blowed!
I've a berth in the Sou'-West workshops, a home in the Wandsworth Road;
And till the 'sociation has footed my buryin' bill,
I work for the kids an' the missus. Pull up? I be damned if I will!"
And over the German benches the bearded whisper ran: --
"Lager, der girls und der dollars, dey makes or dey breaks a man.
If Schmitt haf collared der dollars, he collars der girl deremit;
But if Schmitt bust in der pizness, we collars der girl from Schmitt."
They passed one resolution: -- "Your sub-committee believe
You can lighten the curse of Adam when you've lifted the curse of Eve.
But till we are built like angels -- with hammer and chisel and pen,
We will work for ourself and a woman, for ever and ever, amen."
Now this is the tale of the Council the German Kaiser held --
The day that they razored the Grindstone, the day that the Cat was belled,
The day of the Figs from Thistles, the day of the Twisted Sands,
The day that the laugh of a maiden made light of the Lords of Their Hands.
How outrageous that the Kaiser could promote Socialist drivel like unemployment insurance and what we here call social security! And isn’t funny how the Kaiser and Trump are described in the same ways…?
I can think of few historical figures more dissimilar than Trump and the Kaiser.
Didn’t say they were; just compared contemporaneous descriptions. You did read my two sentences, right?
Yep.
And isn’t funny how the Kaiser and Trump are described in the same ways…?
An untrue statement.
Untrue? Because you say it is? Do you not see what’s said about Trump being a buffoon, unfit for office, bombastic, liar, need I add more epithets? These same things you believe about the Kaiser with no more ‘proof’ than what the yellow press had, and no more proof than our current media have regarding Trump.
You seem to regurgitate all the venom the media and academia spew about all those people they love to hate, which includes Trump, the Kaiser, and Joe McCarthy among many; and two you referred to as “a train wreck” and “a hapless dilettante.”
No, Sir, you are mistaken about this matter of “truth.” You just don’t like what I said and have no facts to refute what small point I made.
Because you say it is?”
Because it is a factually incorrect statement.
“Do you not see what’s said about Trump being a buffoon, unfit for office, bombastic, liar, need I add more epithets?”
Routinely said about all presidents by critics during my lifetime.
“These same things you believe about the Kaiser”
What I know about the Kaiser from the historical record:
You [recruits] have sworn loyalty to me. You have only one enemy and that is my enemy. In the present social confusion it may come about that I order you to shoot down your own relatives, brothers or parents but even then you must follow my orders without a murmur.
Kaiser Wilhem II, November 23, 1891
Ah, Kaiser Bill. In World War I he became a monstrous figure in Allied propaganda, a bloodthirsty ghoul thirsting for world conquest. The reality was rather different. This grandson of Queen Victoria, who spoke English fluently with only a trace of an accent, fancied himself an autocrat of supreme genius to be feared and obeyed. Actually he was a weak-willed man of limited intelligence, easily dominated by those around him if they were craftier than him, which was not a high bar to clear. His tendency to give blood curdling, tough guy utterances, was the dismay of every German government during his reign. Otto von Bismarck, the Iron Chancellor who made the Second German Reich, and who the young Wilhelm II dismissed from office, had the measure of his sovereign, who he regarded as a blundering young idiot who would lead Germany to ruin. That was an accurate assessment. The Kaiser was the worst type of fool, one who regarded himself as a genius and had no clue as to his limitations. During World War I the Kaiser became a sad, pathetic figure, as the Army increasingly ran Germany, paying only lip service to him as Supreme War Lord. Lusting for conflict throughout his reign, he was dismayed as millions of German youth died in the war that he so long had wished for. In his long years of exile in Holland, he died in 1941, he continually blamed the Jews and the English for his downfall, and never demonstrated any insight at all as to the dismal role he played in propelling Germany down the path that led to Hitler, a man who had nothing but contempt for the man in whose Army he had served.
I won’t disagree with most of what you wrote, maybe only degree as that statement from 1891 was within two years of his accession, before being sobered by responsibility. Again, many lies are written as historical fact, and those tirades about defeat are not reflected in his later writings, from what I understand.
But, all presidents referred with those epithets? Some yes, but we’re Carter, the Bushes, Clinton, or Obama declared unfit for office in the ways Trump has? The answer is no; hence my small point.
And for the record, Wilson forcing the crowned heads to abdicate created the vacuum that allowed Hitler, not any of your alleged historical facts about the weakness, intellectual or otherwise, of the Kaiser. The constitutional democracy of the Associated Governments of the German Empire was dependent upon monarchical executives, as was Britain at the time; well maybe until 1911….Weimar was imposed and unpopular, hence an opportunity for a determined fear mongering strongman.