It’s as if he is speaking directly to our time…
In the full episode below, the good Archbishop goes into detail about the three characteristics of the revolution that many are trying to impose on us today.
- Elitism: A minority that makes a lot of noise and uses violence (or anything they can) to force their will upon others.
- Political Mysticism: My will or nothing; wipe the slate clean of any opposition. Note the attempt to “erase” history that is happening today.
- Satanism: God created the universe with order & harmony; this how science can discover the laws of the universe. The essence of Satanism is the destruction of God’s harmony…chaos!
Excellent. Like our own times for sure. But we have learned nothing in the ensuring 56 years.
This program was broadcast in or around 1964 just at the point Vatican II was released upon the world for the purpose revolutionizing the Catholic Church to bring it line with secular culture and distant from God and His Will.
Now we are reaping the whirlwind of this catastrophe. Only God can set us straight now.
This is not a prophecy, you idiots. This is him talking about all the violent student protests of the 60’s.
Watch your tone dekbert.
Wow, Dendrite. Did you come to that conclusion while pondering the meat nuggets in the cafeteria line, or after getting shot down by Ashleigh because you didn’t get the BLM sticker on your locker until after Kyle did?
The author does not mention any specifics but I assume the violence he is referring to are the white nationalists and pro-automatic weapon militias whom have used violence, or threats of violence, in an attempt to maintain an idealized status quo. I have no clue whom the author thinks is “erasing” history. Surely we all understand there is a difference between teaching students the history of racist, slave owning, slavery defending traitors like Robert Lee and Jefferson Davis and erecting statues to their honor. We keep their memories alive by informing people of their repugnant beliefs and save public spaces to honor people who deserve to be honored.
The author does not mention any specifics but I assume the violence he is referring to are the white nationalists and pro-automatic weapon militias whom have used violence, or threats of violence, in an attempt to maintain an idealized status quo.
Snickers Oh, yes, they’re right up there with the bands of violent Amish driving buggies into sky scrapers, they are.
All this sound and fury to distract attention away from… well, this gentleman made a little proposal to the House that covers the bases fairly well:
Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) introduced a Privileged Resolution calling upon Congress to ban any political organization or party that has ever held a public position supportive of slavery or the Confederate States of America.
It also calls for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to remove from the House wing of the U.S. Capitol or any House office building any item that names, symbolizes or mentions any political organization or party that supported slavery or the Confederacy.
Rep. Louie Gohmert released the following statement:
“As outlined in the resolution, a great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan. As the country watches violent leftists burn our cities, tear down our statues and call upon every school, military base and city street to be renamed, it is important to note that past atrocities these radicals claim to be so violently offensive were largely committed by members in good standing of the Democratic Party. Whether it be supporting the most vile forms of racism or actively working against Civil Rights legislation, Democrats in this country perpetuated these abhorrent forms of discrimination and violence practically since their party’s inception. To avoid triggering innocent bystanders by the racist past of the Democratic Party, I would suggest they change their name. That is the standard to which they are holding everyone else, so the name change needs to occur.”
Co-sponsors include: Reps. Andy Biggs, Jody Hice, Randy Weber, Andy Harris.
https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399803
People who deserve to be honored? Like who?
George Washington? Oh wait. Guess not.
Thomas Jefferson? Oh wait. Guess not.
Abraham Lincoln? Oh wait. Guess not.
What about Martin Luthor King Jr? Oh wait. Guess not.
What clever wordplay. Here, let me fix your statement to make it more accurate:
“Honor people who deserve to be honored – just that nobody deserves to be honored.”
Nobody but the currently useful excuse to commit violence and cause destruction, anyways– although Nate and I have both noticed, if you haven’t, John, that those totemic figures get dumped very quickly when they have outlived their usefulness.
Also, folks, please note:
“public space” includes 100% private locations that can be broken into by Progressive shock-troops, who claim the power to remove anything that they don’t personally approve of.
Sounds an awful lot like an armed version of the Freedom From Religion foundation– AKA, the usual low-grade totalitarians who are foolish enough to think that this time, they will be in charge.
There’s a reason that the revolutionaries tend to get shot by their own people as soon as the fight is over.