Saturday, May 18, AD 2024 5:52am

DC Metal

From the ever sombre and serious Iowahawk.  The problem with being a humorist these days is that reality has a habit of catching up with the absurd.  From the Heritage Foundation:

“Will the new majority owner of General Motors — the United States Government — take an active role in managing the firm as it struggles for viability? In a statement earlier today, President Obama insisted that the government wouldn’t impose it’s own political agenda on GM.

“What we are not doing, what I have no interest in doing, is running GM,” he declared. Calling the government a “reluctant shareholder”, he declared that “GM will be run by a private board of directors and management team with a track record in American manufacturing that reflects a commitment to innovation and quality…They and not the government will call the shots and make the decisions about how to turn this company around… When a difficult decision has to be made like where to open a new plant or what type of new car to make, the new GM, not the US government will make that decision”.

This sounds reassuring, but in fact this non-interference pledge was broken even before he started speaking. The White House was already trumpeting a pledge extracted from GM to “build a new small car in an idled UAW factory”, furthering the President’s environmental goals as well as pleasing his labor allies.”

However, Iowahawk was of course wrong as to what government cars will look like.  My guess is that they will more closely resemble this past pride of the East German auto industry.  Oh well, at least Michael Moore is happy.  Glad I’ve always bought Fords.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
viona walsch
viona walsch
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 8:48am

Thanks for the laugh! That video was funny.

I don’t understand the problems the diarist has with building smaller cars, though. Does the Catholic Church have a problem with small cars? WWJD (What would Jesus Drive)?

Dale Price
Dale Price
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 8:51am

It’s difficult to shoehorn four children into a Focus.

Phillip
Phillip
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 8:52am

Then you must have less children!!!!!!!!

DarwinCatholic
Reply to  viona walsch
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:03am

Clearly, Jesus would drive a beat up old pickup with the apostles all riding in the back. James and John’s mother would then show up and ask if one of them could ride shotgun.

And lo, when you enter into the Chevy, who will sit at the right hand of the Son?

I was always kind of charmed by those post-war German micro-cars, having a fondness for small cars. Still, there’s no point in making cars that people don’t want, it’s simply wasteful. The evidence doesn’t seem to point to a situation where everyone wants tiny cars but Detroit refuses to make them. Rather, the reason why they don’t make more small cars is because there’s a limitted market fo them.

That may change, but in the meantime there’s the danger that the administration is pushing GM to make a car that will simply push them deeper into trouble.

Jay Anderson
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:08am

What would Jesus drive?

Let’s see. A guy with long hair and sandals who goes around preaching peace and love with a bunch of other dudes with long hair and sandals. I’m guessing he’d drive this:

http://www.idcow.net/idcow/products/ym2032.jpg

Jay Anderson
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:18am

Suffice it to say, Jesus would’ve needed to drive something large enough to accomodate 13 fully-grown men on numerous round trips between Gallilee and Judea.

But then, I’m guessing those who ask the question in the first place are probably likely to peg Jesus as the sort who would’ve used public transportation to get him and his disciples from Point A to Point B.

Jay Anderson
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:23am

“It’s difficult to shoehorn four children into a Focus.”

Hell, it’s difficult to get four children into a minivan when each one of them is required by law to have his or her own car seat/booster seat. We could easily fit a 5th and maybe even a 6th kid into our minivan if it weren’t for the booster seat requirement for the older kids.

It’s pretty much gotten to the point where larger families (i.e. more than 4 kids) have to take 2 cars to get where they’re going.

viona walsch
viona walsch
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:25am

DarwinCatholic,
When I visited Europe I loved seeing those teeny little cars, too! I would never buy one – it just wouldn’t be safe, and no room for kids, groceries, mutt!

I do think more people want fuel efficient and safe cars. There is a concern that the smaller cars are not safe because there are so many large trucks and SUVs on the highway that upon impact would destroy the small car, regardless of how many airbags it has.

For me, I want to see more people buy smaller, lighter cars so we don’t have those worries (being trampled by the Suburbans, etc), but it’s also like circumcision. I want more people to reject circumcision so that the boys who aren’t circumcised become the majority (disclosure: my son is not circumcised).

i.
i.
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:47am

Jesus and his twelve comrades were all illegal immigrants engaging in border crossing protests to emphasize the sinful structures of society! They drove around Palestine in a low-rider pickup camel with flames painted on the side.

Matt McDonald
Matt McDonald
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:57am

Viona,
I do think more people want fuel efficient and safe cars. There is a concern that the smaller cars are not safe because there are so many large trucks and SUVs on the highway that upon impact would destroy the small car, regardless of how many airbags it has.

When you have only 2 feet of steel in front of you a concrete wall is deadly too, not so much with 8 feet of American steel. Big and small cars can be fuel efficient, but small cars just can’t be made as safe as big cars can. I’ll stick with big, safe and efficient… with the emphasis on safe.

For me, I want to see more people buy smaller, lighter cars so we don’t have those worries (being trampled by the Suburbans, etc), but it’s also like circumcision. I want more people to reject circumcision so that the boys who aren’t circumcised become the majority (disclosure: my son is not circumcised).

I also want more people buy smaller, lighter cars so that my wife and child will be even safer in her truck. Thank you to all of those people buying smart cars for making the road safer for them.

I’m with you on circumcision by the way, but we certainly don’t want the government to levy heavy taxes on those who chose to circumcise, right?

Jay,

VW van is dead on!

Phillip
Phillip
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 10:38am

i,

You’ve read Miguel Diaz.

Donna V.
Donna V.
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 7:56pm

Jay: I think you’re right. But the van needs a groovy paint job with gospel verses written in Day-Glo orange and purple.

When my dad nagged my big brother to get a haircut back in the late ’60’s, my brother’s best argument was to point at the print of the “Last Supper” we had hanging in the kitchen and say “Dad, do you see any buzz cuts there?”

Jay Anderson
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:36pm
Jay Anderson
Wednesday, June 3, AD 2009 9:44pm

Another view:

http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1570/PreviewComp/SuperStock_1570R-23013.jpg

Imagine the writing in Aramaic or Greek instead of French.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top