The State of the Union Address That Will Never Be Delivered

Tuesday, January 28, AD 2014

State of the Union

 

 

Here is the State of the Union Speech that will never be delivered:

“Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, Distinguished Guests, my fellow Americans.  Each year it is a duty of the President to report on the State of the Union to the Congress.  Often these speeches have been mere feel good exercises, frequently containing little of substance.  Tonight is going to be different.  Tonight it is time for blunt truth.

America is a great and strong nation, but in many ways the State of our Union is troubled.  We have the worst economy in the last three decades.  Signs of recovery are few.  I could attempt to assess some responsibility for this poor economy to my predecessor, but that would be pointless.  You, the American people, are not interested in blame.  What you are interested in is improving the economy, and so far, under my watch, that has not happened.  I, in good faith, attempted to stimulate the economy through a massive stimulus bill.  Thus far the results have been meager for the amount of money spent.  Time for a course correction.  Beginning tomorrow I am going to hold meetings with the Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress.  The economy is my number one priority, as it rightly is yours, and I am open to all ideas, from whatever source, to jumpstart the economy and return us to the path to prosperity.  If taxcuts and spending cuts are necessary to get the economy moving, so be it.  Whatever works is my watchword on this key issue.  To quote another President from Illinois, “The dogmas of the quiet past, are inadequate to the stormy present.”  I am a Democrat, by the standards of many Americans a Liberal Democrat.  I’m proud of this, but I will not allow my adherence to certain beliefs to stand in the way of improving the economy.  Time for us all, past time, Republicans, Democrats and Independents, to work together to get the economy moving.    This is my chief concern and I will do whatever it takes to accomplish this task.

 

Tied in with the recovery of our economy is the fact that we simply must get government spending under control.  For decades both parties have, with the tacit consent of most of the American public, engaged in policies that have us now running up annual deficits  in excess of a trillion dollars.  Democrats believe that government programs are necessary to help less fortunate Americans.  Republicans believe in low taxes as a stimulus for the economy.  We have had both all of my adult life, through government by credit card, leaving to the future the day of reckoning.  My fellow Americans, the day of reckoning is here.  We cannot continue on our present course without inflicting permanent harm to our economy.  The cuts necessary to break our spending habits will be painful.  Too many Americans believe that we could balance our budget by ending foreign aid which makes up a very small fraction of the federal budget.  Others, especially politicians, claim we can balance the budget through ending waste, fraud and abuse.  This is all nonsense.  To truly cut spending will require sacrifices that I think most Americans will find  hard to accept, but it must be done.  I will veto any spending bill that does not pay for itself through current revenues.  I will expect my Republican colleagues to come forward with specific proposals as to cuts that can be made in the federal budget.  I will expect both parties to confront the outrage that will descend on the government as cherished programs are slashed or taxes are raised.  For too long we have been content to merely engage in political gamesmanship when it comes to government spending.  The time for games is ended;  the time for action is at hand.

In foreign policy we still confront radical Jihadists willing to kill innocent people to reach their goals.  In Afghanistan we have the hard task of making sure that nation does not relapse into a haven for terrorists.  I have told our generals that I will back them to the hilt in achieving victory in Afghanistan and in the war on terror.  Many Americans are war weary, but these are not optional conflicts.  We must prevail or face a future where terrorism will assume terrifying proportions.

In regard to the Affordable Care Act, obviously changes must be made.  The Act was passed and supported by me with the noblest of intentions to assist Americans who had no health care insurance.  The goal was noble but the execution has been mixed at best.  I will submit to Congress tomorrow proposed changes to improve the Affordable Care Act.  I call upon all members of Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike, to join me in a sincere effort to improve the law for the benefit of all Americans.

Thomas Jefferson when he became our third President sought to heal the partisan divisions in his time by saying that we are all Federalists, we are all Republicans.  Throughout my two terms the parties have confronted each other in an atmosphere of heated, bitter partisanship.  This year is an election year, and naturally both parties will seek to do well in November.  However, this is not a time for business as usual.  Together we can make a start this year in attacking the problems that plague our country.  I pledge myself to work with the Republican and Democratic leadership in Congress to attempt to devise bi-partisan solutions to our nation’s ills.  Too many times the struggle for political advantage blinds us to possible solutions that both sides could embrace if they were not concerned about the political cost.

Compared to other times in the history of our nation, the Civil War, the Great Depression, the World Wars, the challenges confronting us are not on so grand a scale.  However, we, not our children, must deal with them now.  If we succeed, future generations may point to us with pride.  If we fail, less prosperous future generations may bitterly reproach our inability to take simple but painful steps to deal with our economic and budgetary woes.  Americans have a history of directly confronting obstacles and overcoming them.  Together we can do so again.

Goodnight, and may God bless you, and God bless America.

8 Responses to The State of the Union Address That Will Never Be Delivered

  • Well, this is a cute but rather inadequate analysis of our nation’s crisis condition. It ignores what is predicted to be major in the speech, wealth and income inequality, which is a major factor in the fiscal restraint advocated here. It reinforces the notion that spending more than half a trillion dollars a year on military and war is truly justified in order to protect our safety and well-being, an idea that I think is very questionable. It fails to address whether the rich or the poor will be most hurt by the cuts to “cherished programs”. Will these be the cherished Social Security check to pay Grandma’s rent and groceries, or the billions in annual oil subsidies to the otherwise highly profitable oil companies? Will these be cuts to unemployment benefits and food stamps, or cuts to “carried interest” tax deductions for millionaires? The point about the government always stalling and delaying and pushing it down the road is well taken, but that’s about it.

  • “It ignores what is predicted to be major in the speech, wealth and income inequality,”
    Which Obama, by his stewardship of a lousy economy, has materially contributed to. He deserves the appellation “Foodstamp President”. A growing economy is the only way to address disparities in income. Welfare programs fed by a growing government certainly will not, except by making more Americans welfare dependents of Uncle Sucker.

    “It reinforces the notion that spending more than half a trillion dollars a year on military and war is truly justified in order to protect our safety and well-being,”

    Such expenditures are much preferable to going into a major war. As our first President noted in the first state of the Union address:
    “To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.” We have ignored this advice often in our history to our peril.

    “It fails to address whether the rich or the poor will be most hurt by the cuts to “cherished programs”.”

    This administration has a deep commitment to crony capitalism. Such programs as those that funded Solyndra should be on the chopping block.

    “Will these be the cherished Social Security check to pay Grandma’s rent and groceries, or the billions in annual oil subsidies to the otherwise highly profitable oil companies?”

    Grandma of course is likely to get far more from the Ponzi scheme known as social security than she ever put in. However, she is safe as the political will to do anything to reform social security is not there and will not be until the system faces collapse. I would be in favor of doing away with subsidies to all businesses although the “subsidies” to petroleum companies are not what you likely think they are:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/energysource/2012/04/25/the-surprising-reason-that-oil-subsidies-persist-even-liberals-love-them/

  • Romney says Obama’s policy of Quantitative Easing is the biggest cause of income inequality.

  • It is time to put aside long-winded speeches that have little substance. We are in this situation for no one’s fault but or own. It is not democrats or republicans. It is us. We have let this poor economy and out-of-control spending happen.

  • The State of the Union: terminal.

    So, I watched four re-runs of “The Big Bang Theory” in between zapping to and from several college B-Ball games. (That drives the warden nuts.)

    I would have lost IQ-score points if I had wasted two hours of my life listening to rank rhetoric concerning class hate, gender, race baiting, and sexual orientation, delivered by a second-rate, racial agitator/socialist.

    Hey! Next time you feel compelled to listen to the smartest woman (“What difference does it make now?”) on the planet, get out a sheet of paper and pen and make a tick-mark for each “um”, “duh”,and “uh” you hear.

  • No I did not watch,waste of time.Not sure why Woodrow Wilson started the show after Thomas Jefferson started sending his state of the union in writing.The only thing I would add to the undelivered speech would be something to the effect that our problems are in large part to the abandonment of traditional marriage and of the family.

  • Ten seconds, pre-muted, revealed a trio – one on foot leaning on a prop, two seated attentively behind the propped one. The difference between the seated ones was one being bobble-headed in smiling agreement and the other not.
    Indulging in both ‘My Fair Lady’ on demand tv and reading a thing called ‘live blogging’ the speech were how I verified that the above address was not delivered.