Obama’s Latest Fig Leaf is Not Acceptable
Update III: The USCCB Pro-Life Director Richard Doerflinger and Congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey agree with me that this “accommodation” or “compromise” is unacceptable. Sadly Sr. Keehan of the the Catholic Health Associate found this “satisfactory”. It looks like Obama will be happy that Sr. Keehan is on board. Of course, Planned Parenthood and Sr. Keehan agree.
Update II: Rumor confirmed. Insurance, that Religious Institutions pay into, will provide contraception, ie, it is still a violation of the First Amendment.
Update I: Rumor is that “Hawaii” compromise will be offered, but the bishops have already rejected this. So basically it’s a poor attempt at stalling and not really offering a solution.
The buzz this morning is that Obama is “caving in” to the pressure and will announce a “compromise” today at 12:15pm Eastern.
The news reports are saying that Religious Organizations won’t have to offer birth control, only the insurance companies that these Religious Organizations provide will offer birth control.
Yeah, that’s the compromise.
If these reports are true, this is dead on arrival. Changing the meaning of the words won’t do it.
34 Responses to Obama’s Latest Fig Leaf is Not Acceptable
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_YqM_zH1K7Uw/TOK1hLlt3BI/AAAAAAAAA1o/HCzoksN1-ME/s1600/email+icon+32x32.png")
- Pinky commented on Papal Picks
(3 hours ago) - Jon commented on Dorothy Day: Anarcho-Capitalist, Perhaps
(5 hours ago) - John Nolan commented on Papal Picks
(5 hours ago) - Jon commented on Dorothy Day: Anarcho-Capitalist, Perhaps
(6 hours ago) - Pinky commented on The Mask Drops
(8 hours ago) - Suz commented on Blackbeard
(9 hours ago) - Jeanne Rohl commented on Papal Picks
(11 hours ago) - George Haberberger commented on King Kirby, Captain America and American History
(11 hours ago) - Dr Carol Byrne commented on Dorothy Day: Anarcho-Capitalist, Perhaps
(1 days ago) - John Nolan commented on Papal Picks
(1 days ago) - JDP commented on The Mask Drops
(1 days ago)
It’s George Orwell’s 1984, except the date should be 2012.
…only the insurance companies that these Religious Organizations provide will offer birth control…
And who pays premiums into the insurance pool? The Religious Organizations and in most cases, their employees. This is no compromise; it’s word-smithing.
Exactly Big Tex.
I wish I were more eloquent and prescient as you were, but I wanted to get this out and digested before Obama did another Pravda Announcement.
Next, he’ll offer 30 pieces of silver, the price of a man.
I’m insulted.
He must think we are as stupid as he.
Pingback: . . .Breaking: Obama Compromise is No Compromise. . . | ThePulp.it
Politics at its worst. This administration is not caving in on anything. They are mandating and telling the insurance companies what product to sell and at what price to sell. Unconstitutional.
He’s on the run.
Don’t accept the first.
Counter with: “Resign tyrant.”
Let’s pretend that birth control is a health issue (hahahah, sorry — I’ll stop laughing now). Since when is the President qualified to ORDER medical treatments? Did he go to medical school or something?
Lord have mercy. Has Sr. Keehan have no shame? No conscience? Her bishop should have a friendly chat with her, remind her that part of the reason the Church and the entire country is in this mess is in part her doing, and then politely ask her to keep her mouth shut.
Unfortunately it may be that Sr. Keehan has no problem with contraception, sterilization etc.
She also has no problem in wearing anything but a habit.
HHS was The Institute of Medical Services idea. BO and KS said so.
The change in payment was recommended by some Insurance Business Institute.
One, quick little mention of ‘religious liberty’ being intact, so there you guys who are complaining so much.
Contraception was the whole focus of what HHS means to USA, no mention of the laundry list of other ‘care’.
Contraception is good for preventing women’s health problems. What about all the studies of causes for women’s cancer? Women, not girls, what happened to the 11 year olds that were going to be ‘cared’ for? Not PC for a noonday speech for Catholic listeners. Ugh. More questions than answers from he who was paid by a Catholic org. to do work.
Contraception is the lowest common denominator of appeal for those who would trash Church teaching before letting go of complacency.
No apology for using the word Mandate in olden times like yesterday. Now, it’s all about being the bearer of ‘good’ compromise for all concerned, especially those who want contraception. Politics, pandering to voters, and shutting up the Church.
I think Sr. Keehan has no idea how insurance works.
FYI… Jay’s on fire today.
http://proecclesia.blogspot.com/2012/02/digest-of-todays-posts-10-february-2012.html
from he who was paid by a Catholic org. to do work.
He said so.
Too busy today to do anything right now except to note that this is no compromise and anyone who thinks it is is either a fool or a knave. Obama truly does have nothing but contempt for those outside of his ideological bubble.
Who is this Senior Keehan?
Obama went out of his way to say that he supports freedom of religion, pointing out that one of his stints as a community organizer in Chicago was funded by a Catholic group.
Gag me with a spoon. I wonder which Catholic group funded his community organizing. I wonder further if those funds made their way through the CSA.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-announce-accommodation-religious-groups-contraceptive-rule-enough-170500694.html
There can be no compromise with evil.
I would hold out for his resignation. That’s me.
Another great takedown of this duplicitous “compromise” over at Vox Nova.
Haha Paul. I’ll comment on that later. I’ll let others read the takedown first.
“Sister” Keehan is a traitor. If she approves of this, then it is not to be trusted. The road of compromise is never ending! Don’t take it. Time for Catholics willing to suffer persecution to stand up and be counted. If Obama wins this, it’s all over for Faith and freedom. Wake up America!
Immaculate Conception pray for us.
I’ll update my post with that link, Paul. Good catch.
If the bishops will not or cannot make (Sr.) Keehan behave then hopefully the vatican will discipline her and her order. She is a disgrace to American nuns who are pro-life. In effect, she is giving comfort to the enemy and she needs to be stopped!!!
I clicked on the link thinking someone at Vox Nova had actually written something critical of Pharaoh Obama’s “compromise.” It seems most there are content to retreat into philosophical condemnations of American Democracy and other acts of mental onanism.
I suspect MM is waiting for the Dem talking points.
He got them:
http://vox-nova.com/2012/02/10/contraception-compromise-sounds-sensible/
Phillip:
Kudos. I am afflicted with violent nausea by ravings of lunatics that believe in a vast array of dumb and illogical rubbish.
Apparently, that pack of catholic Commies (adherents of the gospel of Mao) believe the destruction of the evil, unjust private sector justifies both the damnation of souls and the denial of basic human rights, i.e., religious liberty.
Seems, they have bought into the tyrant’s alibi: the “welfare of humanity justifies enslaving humanity.”
You are too kind and genteel. I would have waxed sort of alliterative: “acts of mental masturbation.”
The vn are not compromising with evil. They are evil.
There aren’t enough exorcists — are there?
I was going to rebuke T Shaw for going a bit too far, but he’s really not far afield. To rationalize this decision in such a way is just astounding. There really is no road low enough for these folks at VN. That said, I have to agree with Tony on one thing.
Well, at least that one was non-demented sentence in the rant.
How did Sr. Keenan get quoted? I understood this article was about what Catholics thought?
Dan Malone
May God Change Sr. Keehan’s heart. We all should pray she converts and repents. She is truly a lost soul directing others to HELL.
The Catholic Church will never obey this mandate, not if all the powers of Hell were to shove it down our throats. I know that moral doctrine may seem a strange and ancient thing to your administration Mr President, but understand that as Catholics, we are required to disobey unjust law. Commanded. It is our duty. Do you understand the gravity of the ultimatum you’ve made? You have placed the faithful Catholic in a position in which he must choose between obeying your mandate and obeying God. To comply with the HHS mandate will be considered a sin. Regardless of how you view your actions, do not so easily ignore how the Church views your actions — as attacking her flock. Force the mandate on faithful institutions, and faithful institutions will shut down their services. Force it on our hospitals, our universities, our schools, and our convents and we will bear the consequences of looking you, Sibelius and all the rest in the eyes and saying “No.” As it turns out, the Church doesn’t give a damn what you think — She never has cared for the powers of the world — and will resist you with all Her might. To be briefer still, and to say what those bound by politics cannot: Bring it.
Me and my wife have been trying to have a child for over a year and we are seeing a fertility doctor who is putting my wife on birth control for one month to regulate her cycle (i.e., as part of a plan aimed at treatments during the following month). I don’t think this is a sin and I don’t see any problem with the Catholic Church providing those contraceptives if I worked for them. I don’t see the catch-22 Nancy describes because it seems the sin only occurs when contraceptives are used to prevent a pregnancy. Although contraceptives can be used in a sinful way, so can other health-related drugs, medical devices, or equipment. The most obvious examples are the use of many prescription drugs to commit suicide or to be abused. In the case of these other drugs, the Church doesn’t eliminate the drugs from their health plan but instead provides them and expects Catholics to follow its teachings and not use the drugs in the commission of a sin. Why are contraceptives different? They have a number of non-sinful uses, including use by non-Catholic employees or to regulate menstruation (i.e., in someone who is not having sex). I don’t see why providing these drugs would be any more a sin than providing Oxycontin or morphine. Would it be a sin for the Church to provide baseball bats because they could be used to commit a murder?