One Response to Today’s Punditry

  • Kevin J says:

    I have to say I’m deeply suspicious of the Jack Cashill piece. It seems to follow the style of a standard criminal apology piece: highlight exculpatory factors, downplay or don’t bother to recount incriminating factors. I’m no fan of the San Francisco ruling class, but I won’t let my suspicions of them be played by any writer.

Follow TAC by Clicking on the Buttons Below
Bookmark and Share
Subscribe by eMail

Enter your email:

Recent Comments
Our Visitors. . .
Our Subscribers. . .