Over the Transom

I love the word “transom”. It also sounds serious, but has a pleasant bounciness to it and is far less nasty than the word fascist.

Tinny, tinny!!

LOL!!!

Truth.

I don’t know how many years ago they banned my comments. And, I don’t know why I ever looked at that detritus – my lips became fatigued reading the 5,000 words they habitually employ to say, “I hate America and all who do not firmly believe that America is pure evil.”

Now, they call us, “FASCIST.” Isn’t that cute? I guess, “RACIST” was already “taken.”

No wait!

I remember.

I was doing clinical studies for the post-doctoral proctology and there it was I obtained nearly all the data/facts required for the dissertation on VN syndrome (cranium imbedded in rectum) in the commie, abortion catholosphere.

Heh. Although it kind of shatters the irony scale for an anonymous person to make a parody video complaining about anonymous parody blogs.

I suppose it is getting a bit like Bugs and Elmer Fudd going at each other with increasingly large and ridiculous weapons.

I think the real question of import here folks is: Who is Bugs and who is Fudd?

Could we get a seven part post on that which cites the Church Fathers and determines which is more influenced by Enlightenment thinking?

Some folks might watch that video and think that some of the referenced posts are too asinine to be real. Not so: http://vox-nova.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-the-man-in-the-mirror/
http://vox-nova.com/2008/06/17/with-obama-it-really-is-a-vote-for-abortion-among-other-things/#comment-25308

We’ll have none of your French-influenced clap-trap about civil codes and the like, here, Michael Denton. This is America, and almost all of us follow the common law (or at least those precedents which agree with the antecedent beliefs of the judge).

John Henry:

Whatever. You wish you had the elegance and accessibility of the civil code. You can have your Restatements; I’ll take the line of law descended from canon law, thank you very much.

I’m usually all about the civility and the need to avoid blog wars

Are there actual wars going on between Catholic bloggers? Real wars? Or do you just mean exposés? You know, calling these small verbal skirmishes “wars” is sort of insulting to all the innocent people who who have been wounded or even killed in wars started by our own CIA across the globe, not to mention the Israeli Mossad.

Oh, ok. I suppose the Neanderthals who run this blog wouldn’t be able to read a long word like disagreements.

Don:

Pauli’s being sarcastic. As was Pinky.

Don, thank you rising to the blog’s defense. Pauli is basically a blog equivalent of the Joker if the Joker blogged and were on the side of the angels.

To get a feel where he is coming from, here is a link to his blog, Est Quod Est, also known as ContraPauli, which I read faithfully. Pauli is one of the few Catholic bloggers who I believe has a more warped sense of humor than I do.

http://contrapauli.blogspot.com/

That was funny, really it was. It could have gone much further, though.

If you look at the perception that both “sides” seem to have of each other, they both look very much alike!

I do find it all hard to make sense of as far as my own work at Vox Nova goes. I guess I don’t belong there. Maybe I can write here? Or both places? Or none?

~Sam

First? Check your assumptions, Pauli.

Of course you can write here. After all, they keep letting me comment.

And then again, maybe not.

It’s because we’re partisan hacks who put politics before everything.

But you have to appreciate the camerawork, though. . .

I hope y next production will be up to TAC’s exacting standards.

Mel Gibson has signed on to produce.