D.C. Council vs. the Catholic Church Poll
The Washington Post has a poll out on whether or not Washington D.C. should require the Church to follow a law it considers immoral?
This is in regards to whether Catholic Charities should be forced to go against the Catholic Church teachings because they receive funding from the Washington D.C. city council.
In previous TAC posts we wrote about DC Bigotry and about Setting the Record Straight on the Church in D.C. (by Donald R. McClarey and Joe Hargrave respectively).
Of course not, but the Know-Nothings are in force and are skewing the numbers so go to the poll to vote!
To vote click here.
So far as of November 15, 6:15pm CST:
D.C. Council vs. the Catholic Church
The D.C. Council is considering a law forbidding discrimination against those in gay marriages. The law would apply to all groups that have contracts with the District, including Catholic Charities, one of the city’s largest social services providers. The Archdiocese of Washington says that because of the Church’s opposition to same-sex marriage, it would have to suspend its social services to the poor, the homeless and others rather than provide employee benefits to same-sex married couples or allow them to adopt.
Should the city require the Church to follow a law it considers immoral?
Father John Zuhlsdorf and I voted “NO”.
11 Responses to D.C. Council vs. the Catholic Church Poll
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_YqM_zH1K7Uw/TOK1hLlt3BI/AAAAAAAAA1o/HCzoksN1-ME/s1600/email+icon+32x32.png")
Recent Comments
- Arkasha commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(7 minutes ago) - c matt commented on Pro-Aborts at Record Low
(1 hours ago) - enness commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(1 hours ago) - elm commented on Pro-Aborts at Record Low
(2 hours ago) - Tim Lambert commented on Pro-Aborts at Record Low
(2 hours ago) - digdigby commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(2 hours ago) - WK Aiken commented on Pro-Aborts at Record Low
(3 hours ago) - Faith commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(3 hours ago) - Kat commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(3 hours ago) - Art Deco commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(5 hours ago) - Peter commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(1 days ago) - Jim commented on Margeaux's Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
(1 days ago) - Valentin commented on Catholic Vote Beclowns Itself for Romney
(1 days ago) - Valentin commented on Catholic Vote Beclowns Itself for Romney
(1 days ago) - Valentin commented on See You In Court Mr. Obama
(1 days ago)
RealCatholicTV.com
Digest of Top Posts in St. Blogs
I voted no. Surprise!
The presiding Priest at the 10:00 Mass this morning at St. Matthew’s Cathedral (Fr. Knestout) preached on the controversy surrounding Catholic Charities as it relates to this bill. Fr. Knestout is very reserved, but you can feel the force of his disgust with the media coverage of the situation. He suggested that after all the emails he received from irate individuals, perhaps those emails should now be sent to the people on the City Council responsible for this unconstitutional abomination.
Sadly we can expect this sort of mess when the Church accepts terms and missions from pagan governments. We should stay clear. The Church is not a welfare agency. Before you bleeding hearts jump on me for being callous and unCatholic, I am not suggesting that we do not have a commandment to feed, clothe, etc. and take care of the poor and infirm; I am saying that it is more important for the Church to help get their souls saved than to feed them.
Ideally the Church will do both; however, when the Church begins to take money and queues from pagan governments the worshipers of the spirit of the present darkeness will seek to silence the Church (no proselytizing). DC has decided to bunt the Church – good. Do the work anyway and preach the Gospel while doing it.
BTW – I voted no! Did you read the misinformed venom in the comments? This is scary stuff – its not funny and it should not be taken lightly. Hating Catholics that aren’t with the program, nudge, nudge, wink, wink is cool. Bring it on!
Thanks guys for voting.
It seems to be helping a little. The ‘No’ are now 26% instead of 25%.
There must be a lot of bigoted people in DC for the numbers to be skewed that way.
Tito,
That comes as no surprise to those of us trapped behind enemy lines in enemy-occupied Northern Virginia (Greater Washington, DC).
Pray, pray, pray.
St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle. . .
So much for democracy, the best form of government?
I voted “no” – It is an act of charity to give those with same-sex attraction a united Catholic face- that stays with the truth/mercy of our Catholic teaching. Those who enable sin may be even more accountable for that sin than those who ignorantly engage in the sinful act itself. The sin of misleading the little ones- with the image of the millstone tied around one’s waist and being cast into a deep Sea- should be sobering for any Catholic who seeks to re-write the Catechism.
the father z approach to online witness! way to go!
Here’s another lesson in the difference between charity and government. Would that our bishops learn from these lessons and lose their habit of plumping for government spending labeled ‘welfare.’
P.Z. Myers has posted this poll on his blog and has asked his readers to skew the results.
While I agree with Fr Z on the question the poll asks, I’m not sure starting a poll skewing war with the sundry inhabitants of cyberspace is .. a worthwhile pursuit.