Lying Worthless Political Hack Calls Opponents of ObamaCare Nazis
I must say, although I have never been a fan of the Lying Worthless Political Hack, I was surprised at this latest example of the depths of her political ineptitude and detachment from reality. As to her comment about “astroturfing” ( creating a fake, rather than a real, grassroots movement), David Axlerod, the campaign manager of Obama, built a large fortune by mastering the techniques of astroturfing as this article here relates. Alas for the Lying Worthless Political Hack, as the polls amply indicate, the opposition to ObamaCare is real and growing.
Update: The indispensable Iowahawk has the White House Under Minister for Truth, former ABC and CBS reporter Linda Douglass, explaining here all about those evil townhall mob agitators!
22 Responses to Lying Worthless Political Hack Calls Opponents of ObamaCare Nazis
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_YqM_zH1K7Uw/TOK1hLlt3BI/AAAAAAAAA1o/HCzoksN1-ME/s1600/email+icon+32x32.png")
Recent Comments
- Harry Piper commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(29 minutes ago) - Historyshowsus commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(1 hours ago) - Paul Nielander commented on Yes I Still Support The Iraq War
(3 hours ago) - Pat commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Obama is Not Satan
(3 hours ago) - Nate Wildermuth commented on Yes I Still Support The Iraq War
(3 hours ago) - Donald R. McClarey commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(4 hours ago) - SYWink commented on There Is Not Just One Way To Be Pope
(5 hours ago) - C in OK commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Obama is Not Satan
(5 hours ago) - Greg Mockeridge commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(7 hours ago) - Donald R. McClarey commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(7 hours ago) - Greg Mockeridge commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(7 hours ago) - Donald R. McClarey commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(9 hours ago) - Jay Anderson commented on Top Ten Reasons Why Liberals Would Have Hated Abraham Lincoln
(9 hours ago) - philip commented on Dr. Ed Peters: "Nancy Pelosi will not change on her own"
(1 days ago) - Elaine Krewer commented on Of Centurions, Love and Kipling
(1 days ago)
Our Visitors. . .
Our Subscribers. . .
One of the cultural problems that stem from gerrymandering and de facto one party rule: never having to face a credible opposition slowly teaches you that the opposition is never credible.
Add in someone with the combustible demerits of Ms. Pelosi, and you get moments of unreality like this.
As a member of the “…most diabolical cabal standing in the way of our great push forward for your health!” I appreciate your comments.
I think maybe the swastikas are meant for her. I mean, were the Nazi’s in favor of socializing health care?
Basic ground rule: The first person who compares their opponent to Hitler/Nazis loses the argument, automatically. You have revealed that your position has no logical underpinnings and simply relies on emotion.
Patrick,
I think maybe Jay made up that rule.
Though Pelosi lives in Bizarro World called the Castro District of San Francisco, so she only gets her information from the SF Chronicle and Milo the Fortune Teller.
The Castro District. How appropriate.
As horrible as a person as she is, I would rather have her as president. She doesn’t possess the Kool-Aid factor. No one is going to follow her off a cliff.
Daledog,
That’s because she is already off the cliff.
Hmmm, we’re being called Nazis now. Babs Boxer thought the crowd who booed Spector was suspiciously well-dressed (because we all know genuine protestors have long unwashed hair and wear T-shirts with obscene slogans). And, of course, we’re all rednecks too.
Forget terrorists – the republic is in mortal peril because of well dressed Nazi rednecks.
I think maybe Jay made up that rule.
Tito,
I appreciate your giving me credit, but, actually, that’s called Godwin’s Law.
What I came up with was a similar corollary that applied to people bringing up the priest sex abuse crisis in any discussion involving the Church or the Catholic Bishops.
You can call that one “Anderson’s Law”, if you’d like.
Jay,
My confusion.
That’s what I was thinking I guess.
There, too, is another corollary which amounts to the “Tito Taco Law”, which essentially involves bringing up the Archbishop Romero scandal in any discussion wherein Tito is involved in order to win over any argument by simply demonstrating Tito is nothing more than an Anti-Catholic, as MM & Iafrate previously indicated in earlier threads.
Pingback: Hey Pelosi, Are Senior Citizens “Well Dressed Nazi’s”? « The American Catholic
e.,
Tito Taco Law
how a propos.
Pingback: Sleeping Giant Awakes and Democrats Blink « The American Catholic
Pingback: Pajamas Media » Health Care Reform is About Control, Not Health
Pingback: What We Are Learning About Obama From the Health Care Debacle « The American Catholic
Pingback: ObamaCare Update « The American Catholic
Pingback: Father Norman Weslin, Champion of the Unborn « The American Catholic
Pingback: Pelosi, Saint Joseph and the Catholic Medical Association « The American Catholic
Pingback: The Dignity and Worth of Every Person « The American Catholic
Pingback: The Values of the Word « The American Catholic