June 20, 1865: Grant Puts a Stop to Treason Trials

 

 

It is  little remembered now, but in 1865 there was a brief attempt to conduct treason trials against Confederate generals.  On June 7, 1865, U.S. District Judge John C. Underwood in Norfolk, Virginia issued indictments against Lee, Longstreet, Early and other Confederate generals on charges of treason.  Lee wrote to General Grant asking if the terms granted at Appomattox were still in effect.  Furious at this attempt to undo his work, Grant immediately wrote to Secretary of War Stanton:

 

In my opinion the officers and men paroled at Appomattox Court-House, and since, upon the same terms given to Lee, cannot be tried for treason so long as they observe the terms of their parole. This is my understanding. Good faith, as well as true policy, dictates that we should observe the conditions of that convention. Bad faith on the part of the Government, or a construction of that convention subjecting the officers to trial for treason, would produce a feeling of insecurity in the minds of all the paroled officers and men. If so disposed they might even regard such an infraction of terms by the Government as an entire release from all obligations on their part. I will state further that the terms granted by me met with the hearty approval of the President at the time, and of the country generally. The action of Judge Underwood, in Norfolk, has already had an injurious effect, and I would ask that he be ordered to quash all indictments found against paroled prisoners of war, and to desist from further prosecution of them.

Grant then saw President Johnson.  Initially Johnson said that the treason trials should proceed.  Grant said he would immediately resign his commission if the Government went back on what he pledged at Appomattox.  Johnson backed down and had the indictments quashed.  Grant then wrote back to Lee on June 20, 1865 saying that the terms of Appomattox would be observed.  He did not mention that it took his threat of resignation to accomplish it.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom
Tom
Tuesday, August 29, AD 2017 8:50am

All this means is now Grant’s statues and memory will have to be desecrated. Guilt by association is enough for the iconoclasts. But this is a timely reminder when we hear so frequently that the Confederates were “traitors” or guilty of “treason.” Not only did Grant and other Unionists want to show leniency, but as a practical matter, applying a strict definition of treason to the people of the South would have required charging literally thousands upon thousands of Southerners who aided and abetted the Confederacy. Cooler heads and a war-weary populace thankfully prevailed.

T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Sunday, June 20, AD 2021 9:27am

First thing we do, let’s kill all the judges.

Steve Phoenix
Steve Phoenix
Sunday, June 20, AD 2021 11:43am

Not a surprise that a judge, who arguably started the Civil War (Chief Justice Roger B Taney, although 5 others voted with him, Scott v. Sanford, 1857), Came darn well near close to the reigniting it.

Some people never learn a lesson from being an unjust judge.

SouthCoast
SouthCoast
Monday, June 21, AD 2021 12:29pm

Just went and read up on the Scott case for the first time since high school, to discover that the version I learned was bowdlerized, and worse than I thought. Taney not only confirmed slavery, he also stripped all, free African Americans of their civil rights and declared them non-citizens. Evil.

Art Deco
Art Deco
Monday, June 21, AD 2021 12:56pm

Men of honor. Nowadays, our government is run by men like Adam Schiff and Peter Sztrok.

Lead kindly light
Lead kindly light
Friday, June 20, AD 2025 6:41am

T. Shaw

First thing we do, let’s kill all the judges.

You probably know that the Dick the Butcher quote from Henry the 6th part 2 is typically misused as an indictment against lawyers. The context is different. Dick is saying that unless you kill the lawyers he can’t get away with his nefarious deeds.

Although, considering that we have government by law fare and the courts used in a way that was never intended by the Founders, I completely understand the sentiment. All of the Founders have to be rolling over in their graves to see that we now are ruled by an unelected judicial oligarchy appointed for life.

The Bruised Optimist
The Bruised Optimist
Friday, June 20, AD 2025 10:42am

“they might even regard such an infraction of terms by the Government as an entire release from all obligations on their part”
(Grant was so much smarter than my high school ever told me.)
Even if he was unaware of Forrest’s suggestion of guerilla war, he understood that, if the South was betrayed in this fashion, perennial unrest would almost certainly erupt, to the detriment of both sides.

Scroll to Top