When it comes to political correctness, no one can out PC most Catholic “citadels of higher education”:
DePaul University will no longer allow students to chalk political messages on the sidewalks of its campus because of the “offensive, hurtful, and divisive” nature of pro-Trump chalking found on campus last week.
“While these chalk messages are part of national agendas in a heated political battle, they appeared on campus at a time of significant racial tension in our country and on college campuses. DePaul is no exception,” Depaul’s vice president for student affairs Eugene Zdziarski wrote in a campus-wide email obtained by Campus Reform. “The university has been addressing campus climate issues in an effort to provide an inclusive and supportive educational environment. In this context, many students, faculty and staff found the chalk messages offensive, hurtful and divisive.”
Consequently, Zdziarski explained that DePaul’s status as a 501(c)3 tax-exempt non-profit organization prohibits students from participating in any political activity that could be interpreted as a reflection of the university’s “views or opinions.” Political chalking on Depaul’s grounds, Zdziarski argued, fits this description.
“However, as a 501(c)3 tax-exempt non-profit organization, the university is significantly limited in the types of political activities it can promote or support,” he wrote. “In accordance with federal regulations, DePaul may not engage in any activity in support of or opposition to any candidate for public office, federal, state or local. In practice, this means no partisan political advertising may be conducted on campus that could in any way be attributed to DePaul University.”
Last week, Depaul’s College Republicans organized a chalking
campaign on campus, during which phrases such as “Make DePaul great again,” “Blue Lives Matter,” and “Trump Train 2016” were scrawled on the sidewalks.
The campus grounds crew removed the chalkings the following morning but cited routine maintenance as one of the reasons for their removal.
“After some investigation, it turns out this happened for two reasons,” the university wrote in a statement. “First, the crew regularly cleans up chalk messages on our sidewalks. This is a part of their duties. Secondly, some among the crew considered the messages inflammatory. The crew has agreed to consult about such matters in the future.”
Although the grounds crew “regularly cleans up chalk messages,” meaning DePaul students regularly chalk their campus’ sidewalks, this appears to be the first time university officials have expressly addressed their chalking policies. Zdziarski noted, after the Trump chalkings appeared, that students are not even allowed to chalk on sidewalks at all.
“Students or student organizations may not post partisan political flyers, posters, signs or images on University bulletin board, buildings, electronic message boards, forums or sidewalks. This includes chalking on campus property,” he said.
Go here to read the rest. In reference to the alleged concern by DePaul that posters, chalkings, etc., put up by students and other private individuals and groups could in any way jeopardize their tax exempt status, here is my considered legal opinion:
Go here to see how seriously DePaul takes its non-political stance:
But DePaul has repeatedly conflicted with its Catholic identity through support of groups and events inconsistent with Church teaching, including transgender workshops and student mentor programs that encourage alternate genders and gender pronouns. In May, the Newman Society also identified DePaul as one of the eight Catholic colleges hosting “lavender graduations.”
DePaul’s student newspaper, The DePaulia, reported that “[t]his is the second straight year that DePaul’s LGBTQ Student Services is organizing a contingent of DePaul students to march in the parade,” joined by “student groups such as Act Out DePaul and Spectrum DePaul.”
The student vice president of Act Out DePaul was quoted in the DePaulia article as stating that “DePaul is a strong supporter of queer students’ rights on campus.” “We are the largest Catholic university in the nation, and we have a strong and thriving queer community and LGBTQAI+ program,” he reportedly said.
The Cardinal Newman Society reported on DePaul’s participation in the Pride Parade last year, which featured several advocates of same-sex marriage during the parade, including Human Rights Campaign, Lambda Legal and Equality Illinois.
DePaul University’s communications team did not respond to The Cardinal Newman Society’s request for comment.
My 1960’s, 70’s, and teen parenting experience tells me that the more something is banned, the more young people will buy into it. Who knows how this planned anti-free speech foolishness will end?
I concur with Don’s legal opinion. DePaul’s assertion that these chaulkings could somehow jeopardize its exempt status is fatuous nonsense of the highest order. I’ll go further: it is not grounded in error; it is a flat out knowing lie.
LGBTQAI+?
Wow, I have NOT been keeping up. Sorry, was that a microaggression?
LGBTQAI+ program
.
Okay, this means Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and….I’m not sure of what AI means? Artificial Intelligence? So, we are now including the feelings and experiences of “sex bots”?
.
If not, we had better be pretty soon. The Japanese already have some very life like ‘bots.
.
I want my sons to be electricians or carpenters or hockey players when they grow up. Higher education is too expensive and it sucks.
Will somebody please explain to me why Q when there in L, G, B already in the mix? If we are going to add AI why not BE or AL (to be discreet)? and P (although L for Lambda is more discreet.)
Gee just yesterday bored in traffic, I was deciphering the COEXIST bumper sticker.
I agree with Penguin Fan. For most folks college is a complete waste of time and money. Much better to learn a trade and get a job. And, if your are interested in higher education better to make it a do-it-yourself program. Most of my kids did go to college 30 years ago but they paid for much of it themselves especially the ones that went on to medical school. Today, college is so much more expensive and except for certain professions largely irrelevant.
It is hard to reconcile the amount of hate on the average Twitter feed with the extreme sensitivity that college students have to sidewalk slogans. Is blocking software better than I think? Or are people really so detached from what they see on the screen that they don’t notice hostility unless it’s on the sidewalk? It just doesn’t make sense to me.
Let’s hope a DePaul English prof didn’t write the video identifier on Obama one.