Sentencing a man to death because he refuses to get an experimental vaccine, of dubious utility, for a disease that has a recovery rate of 99.9% Lethal virtue signaling.
The Cruelty is the Point
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
Interesting that it’s the British Daily Mail covering this story of the cruelty of a Massachusetts hospital.
I’m guessing corporate American media choose to ignore this.
It would be interesting to hear the hospital try to defend its decision. Would they do the same thing to a patient who had refused a flu vaccination? Someone whose rubella vaccination wasn’t up to date? If not, why is it different with covid?
It’s easy for bureaucrats to be thugs— responsibility is diffused, and no single person has to accept blame for bad decisions like this.
Going off of the friend waiting for a liver transplant, it’s the transplant system that is requiring vaccination.
Cruelty certainly is the point. I hope those who support this man’s inhumanity to man repent before they die and that the Almighty is in a good mood on the day of their particular judgement.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/kevindowneyjr/2022/01/25/unvaxxed-dad-removed-from-heart-transplant-list-hes-not-the-first-n1552741
I do not trust organized medicine, especially its ‘public health’ and bioethics wings. I’m not sure I trust my own doctor.
The excuse is so absurd.
Because he isn’t vaxxed he probably will die. Their assumptions are backwards.
99% live after being diagnosed with Covid..not 99% die.
Because he has a “poor chance of living,” according to Art’s link.
They assume the worst case scenario.
Bull pucky.
It’s a cult.
Since they know not God they invent God in their image….backwards bastards.
https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1486355711131103243?cxt=HHwWlsC9vZ2pzKApAAAA
While we’re at it, recall that the Alliance Defending Freedom paid this man a salary for seven years after which he was put on Richard Lowry’s patronage at National Review.
I think a compelling argument can be made that the jab poses a greater danger to a young man of only 31 who is the recipient of a heart transplant, since myocarditis is a side effect of the “vaccines” for the young. But the “get the jab or else” totalitarians couldn’t care less because, for them, this is about a power grab, not public health.