New Ways Ministry was founded in 1977 in the Archdiocese of Washington by Sister Jeannine Gramick and Father Robert Nugent, who were the subject of a notification by the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1999.
The notification, signed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future Benedict XVI, said that their positions “regarding the intrinsic evil of homosexual acts and the objective disorder of the homosexual inclination are doctrinally unacceptable because they do not faithfully convey the clear and constant teaching of the Catholic Church in this area.”
In 2010, Cardinal Francis George, then president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, issued a statement emphasizing that New Ways Ministry “has no approval or recognition from the Catholic Church and that they cannot speak on behalf of the Catholic faithful in the United States.”
Bonaventura told CNA on Dec. 7, after the link had been removed, that his “team was not aware of the situation of the New Ways organization and of the clarification given by the USCCB President in 2010.”
Go here to read the rest. The Lavender Mafia Pope will not have his people dissed. Whether Francis is a homosexual himself is immaterial. His policies would be little different if he were.
Synodality will become Sodomality, the listening session.
It looks like far more than mere “Satanic smoke” has entered the tabernacle. Time for a “head to toe” exorcism bath and it must work particularly hard at the head part.
https://newdailycompass.com/en/lgbtq-lobby-has-already-triumphed-at-the-synod#.YbsT15jnlEY.twitter
It seems more & more that Archbishop LeFevbre was right:
We hold firmly with all our heart and with all our mind to Catholic Rome, Guardian of
the Catholic Faith and of the traditions necessary to the maintenance of this faith, to the
eternal Rome, mistress of wisdom and truth.
We refuse on the other hand, and have always refused, to follow the Rome of NeoModernist and Neo-Protestant tendencies which became clearly manifest during the
Second Vatican Council, and after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.1
It thus appears impossible to approach the basic problem, which the agreement of the
Conciliar Church, as H. E. Mgr. Benelli himself calls it in his last letter, and the Catholic
Church.
Let there be no mistake. It is not a question of a difference between Mgr. Lefebvre and
Pope Paul VI. It is a question of the radical incompatibility between the Catholic Church
and the Conciliar Church, the Mass of Paul VI being the symbol and the program of the
Conciliar Church