We have lost the mystery and awe of the traditional Catholic Mass. There have always been bad Catholics, but they usually believed that Catholicism was true. The Catholic Faith is true, every jot and tittle of it, but too often what is being pushed as Catholicism is, at best, a pale reflection of what Catholicism is and has been down through the centuries.
Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay in the Nineteenth Century was no friend of the Church, but he understood the strength of real Catholicism:
The Church of Rome . . . thoroughly understands, what no other Church has ever understood, how to deal with enthusiasts. In some sects, particularly in infant sects, enthusiasm is suffered to be rampant. In other sects, particularly in sects long established and richly endowed, it is regarded with aversion. The Catholic Church neither submits to enthusiasm nor proscribes it, but uses it. She considers it as a great moving force which in itself, like the muscular power of a fine horse, is neither good nor evil, but which may be so directed as to produce great good or great evil; and she assumes the direction to herself. It would be absurd to run down a horse like a wolf. It would be still more absurd to let him run wild, breaking fences, and trampling down passengers. The rational course is to subjugate his will without impairing his vigour, to teach him to obey the rein, and then to urge him to full speed. When once he knows his master, he is valuable in proportion to his strength and spirit. Just such has been the system of the Church of Rome with regard to enthusiasts. She knows that, when religious feelings have obtained the complete empire of the mind, they impart a strange energy, that they raise men above the dominion of pain and pleasure, that obloquy becomes glory, that death itself is contemplated only as the beginning of a higher and happier life. She knows that a person in this state is no object of contempt. He may be vulgar, ignorant, visionary, extravagant; but he will do and suffer things which it is for her interest that somebody should do and suffer, yet from which calm and sober-minded men would shrink. She accordingly enlists him in her service, assigns to him some forlorn hope, in which intrepidity and impetuosity are more wanted than judgment and self-command, and sends him forth with her benedictions and her applause.
In England it not unfrequently happens that a tinker or coal- heaver hears a sermon or falls in with a tract which alarms him about the state of his soul. If he be a man of excitable nerves and strong imagination, he thinks himself given over to the Evil Power. He doubts whether he has not committed the unpardonable sin. He imputes every wild fancy that springs up in his mind to the whisper of a fiend. His sleep is broken by dreams of the great judgment-seat, the open books, and the unquenchable fire. If, in order to escape from these vexing thoughts, he flies to amusement or to licentious indulgence, the delusive relief only makes his misery darker and more hopeless. At length a turn takes place. He is reconciled to his offended Maker. To borrow the fine imagery of one who had himself been thus tried, he emerges from the Valley of the Shadow of Death, from the dark land of gins and snares, of quagmires and precipices, of evil spirits and ravenous beasts. The sunshine is on his path. He ascends the Delectable Mountains, and catches from their summit a distant view of the shining city which is the end of his pilgrimage. Then arises in his mind a natural and surely not a censurable desire, to impart to others the thoughts of which his own heart is full, to warn the careless, to comfort those who are troubled in spirit. The impulse which urges him to devote his whole life to the teaching of religion is a strong passion in the guise of a duty. He exhorts his neighbours; and, if he be a man of strong parts, he often does so with great effect. He pleads as if he were pleading for his life, with tears, and pathetic gestures, and burning words; and he soon finds with delight, not perhaps wholly unmixed with the alloy of human infirmity, that his rude eloquence rouses and melts hearers who sleep very composedly while the rector preaches on the apostolical succession. Zeal for God, love for his fellow-creatures, pleasure in the exercise of his newly discovered powers, impel him to become a preacher. He has no quarrel with the establishment, no objection to its formularies, its government, or its vestments. He would gladly be admitted among its humblest ministers, but, admitted or rejected, he feels that his vocation is determined. His orders have come down to him, not through a long and doubtful series of Arian and Popish bishops, but direct from on high. His commission is the same that on the Mountain of Ascension was given to the Eleven. Nor will he, for lack of human credentials, spare to deliver the glorious message with which he is charged by the true Head of the Church. For a man thus minded, there is within the pale of the establishment no place. He has been at no college; he cannot construe a Greek author or write a Latin theme; and he is told that, if he remains in the communion of the Church, he must do so as a hearer, and that, if he is resolved to be a teacher, he must begin by being a schismatic. His choice is soon made. He harangues on Tower Hill or in Smithfield. A congregation is formed. A licence is obtained. A plain brick building, with a desk and benches, is run up, and named Ebenezer or Bethel. In a few weeks the Church has lost for ever a hundred families, not one of which entertained the least scruple about her articles, her liturgy, her government, or her ceremonies.
Far different is the policy of Rome. The ignorant enthusiast whom the Anglican Church makes an enemy, and whatever the polite and learned may think, a most dangerous enemy, the Catholic Church makes a champion. She bids him nurse his beard, covers him with a gown and hood of coarse dark stuff, ties a rope round his waist, and sends him forth to teach in her name. He costs her nothing. He takes not a ducat away from the revenues of her beneficed clergy. He lives by the alms of those who respect his spiritual character, and are grateful for his instructions. He preaches, not exactly in the style of Massillon, but in a way which moves the passions of uneducated hearers; and all his influence is employed to strengthen the Church of which he is a minister. To that Church he becomes as strongly attached as any of the cardinals whose scarlet carriages and liveries crowd the entrance of the palace on the Quirinal. In this way the Church of Rome unites in herself all the strength of establishment, and all the strength of dissent. With the utmost pomp of a dominant hierarchy above, she has all the energy of the voluntary system below. It would be easy to mention very recent instances in which the hearts of hundreds of thousands, estranged from her by the selfishness, sloth, and cowardice of the beneficed clergy, have been brought back by the zeal of the begging friars.
Even for female agency there is a place in her system. To devout women she assigns spiritual functions, dignities, and magistracies. In our country, if a noble lady is moved by more than ordinary zeal for the propagation of religion, the chance is that, though she may disapprove of no doctrine or ceremony of the Established Church, she will end by giving her name to a new schism. If a pious and benevolent woman enters the cells of a prison to pray with the most unhappy and degraded of her own sex, she does so without any authority from the Church. No line of action is traced out for her; and it is well if the Ordinary does not complain of her intrusion, and if the Bishop does not shake his head at such irregular benevolence. At Rome, the Countess of Huntingdon would have a place in the calendar as St. Selina, and Mrs. Fry would be foundress and first Superior of the Blessed Order of Sisters of the Gaols.
Place Ignatius Loyola at Oxford. He is certain to become the head of a formidable secession. Place John Wesley at Rome. He is certain to be the first General of a new society devoted to the interests and honour of the Church. Place St. Theresa in London. Her restless enthusiasm ferments into madness, not untinctured with craft. She becomes the prophetess, the mother of the faithful, holds disputations with the devil, issues sealed pardons to her adorers, and lies in of the Shiloh. Place Joanna Southcote at Rome. She founds an order of barefooted Carmelites, every one of whom is ready to suffer martyrdom for the Church; a solemn service is consecrated to her memory; and her statue, placed over the holy water, strikes the eye of every stranger who enters St. Peter’s.
Access without effort seems to be the common thread.
While that may get people in, it doesn’t get people to *stay*.
Lord McCauley would have to rewrite all of this today when talking about the Anglicans. All the pronouns are wrong considering the current Archbishop of Canterbury proving his point.
Went to NO Mass yesterday alone, my wife asked “How was it?” And I answered “sappy”.
The priest in his performance (and that’s a huge problem) was trying to be reverent but it came off as sappy. I thought directly after Mass “should I tell him?”, and decided no “it’s too great a problem and one he alone can’t fix”.
Please suffer me David WS, bc I’m positive you know this; As long as the consecration prayers are spoken correctly and the matter is true, it’s your big Brother, who enters into your heart, knowing full well how much you wished He be reverenced and honored.
We suffer with Him, so as to rise with Him.
Your longing to behold in awe and proper worship the King of Kings and Lord of Lords is gift to Him.
There, among the sappiness, Our Lord reigns just as He did upon His arrival in a cold dark cave of Bethlehem.
Pray for those priests.
When you purge the semenaries of serious, reverent men, and only ordain effeminate and perpetually adolescent theater kids, these are their fruits.
Phillip,
I ducked into perpetual adoration directly after that Mass and do pray for priests. And yes I do suffer through these Masses but is it too much to Ask to just be able to go to Mass without such sappy mess?
And I’m worried about younger Catholics, they’re leaving.
You’re right, CAG, but at the same time we in the Dallas Diocese have seen a procession of young Millennial priests coming into our parishes with a traditional fire burning in their hearts. They celebrate the Novus Ordo liturgy like the MFVA priests on EWTN, and they preach the Gospel and give counsel in confession and spiritual direction in a way that would please even a Fulton Sheen. I may only be seeing the graduates of one seminary here, but at least there is one that isn’t throwing out the real men. There must be more, as I hear and read similar comments from many places.
The experiments of the 60s and 70s have mostly failed at the parish level, and their perpetrators are dying off. I believe there will be a great revival, but it will have to take place without much help from Rome. I just pray that it takes hold before the Modernists complete their revolution to make the Catholic Church look exactly like the Anglicans.
David WS-
Don’t be worried because they’re leaving.
Be worried if you are doing something to make them leave. (I’m pretty sure you are not.)
Men who love God enough to be angry when He is disrespected will not really leave Him, not permanently. Man lives in time. He is given (subjected to?) a certain span of years by his Creator in which to get his head screwed on sufficiently straight so that he might successfully come home to Him. Everything else is subplot. Ten of the apostles cut and ran in panic. Each one of them is now a saint. The story of salvation not a straight line. Men detour – a lot.
That said, woe to those who scatter His sheep.
It is good when the Catholic Church has different rites, different orders, different devotions, but retains the same beliefs. These differences *are* strength.
Our peril is not Latin vs the vernacular, statues & incense vs star trek sanctuaries. Our very real peril is the doctrinal drift and confusion that has been business as usual for my entire life.
It must stop.
TBO: Lex orandi lex credendi.
Liturgical irreverence begets Disney doctrine.
Frank: True, there are some very good seminaries. It takes work to build them, and they often don’t survive a change in Bishop (Madison Wisconsin, for instance).
The corrupt promote the corrupt while those of integrity remain at the local level.
The world is a mess so, where once upon a time the depraved joined the priesthood to hide, now they can happily live out their depravity in polite (lay) society. The days seem to be coming where the corrupt who enter or remain in the clerical state do so because they want to burn it all down.
I hope I’m just being too overly cynical.
CAG-
Re: irreverence, yes, I agree, 100%
My point was that reverence and orthodoxy can take different *legitimate* appearances.
There are many different chalices that can be used reverently but do not look identical.
I sometimes attend a very reverent NO Mass in a star trek looking sanctuary. I have also been to modernist train wreck Masses in gothic jewels. My point was that sometimes we fixate on the appearance, not the reverence.
PS I attend the reverent star trek sanctuary whenever the squishy modernist priest is scheduled in the other parish I attend. I know He is present at both Masses, but I’m responsible for what homilies my kids hear…
“… but is it too much to Ask to just be able to go to Mass without such sappy mess?
And I’m worried about younger Catholics, they’re leaving.”
Not all are leaving. The old rite is attractive to many young families and the bent to chloroform the TLM is counterproductive imho.
This is hitting us hard right now. A string of vocations to the priesthood the permanent deaconate and religious life is in part due to our leadership at Holy Rosary. That holy man, our priest, has been reassigned to an iconic Catholic landmark in Michigan, Cross in The Woods.
We are all scratching our heads at this one.
No Parish where there is a high school or middle school to continue on his teaching and growing seminarians. Nope.
His fault?
None. Our parish generates the most vocations to religious life. It’s a fact.
I could give a litany of what I believe is truly the reasons but you already know them.
We are being tested. Our Church is nailed to the Cross. Saints are being made in this era of chastisement. That’s why our prayers need to be quadrupled.
Trusting in God isn’t naivete.
We know that the darkness that Job was surrounded in wasn’t a darkness of evil, but a dark night of the soul which brought about a deeper love for God than if he had never suffered such great loss.
Like the Cross ..like Jobs darkness, the Church today must Trust in God at a supernatural level.
By this Trust are the great days to come.
***I know my redeemer lives.***
*** My Lord and my God.***
Saint Padre Pio once said; “Pray. Hope and don’t worry.”
The owner of the Ship knows what’s going on.
In his 2023 book “The Liturgy, the Family, and the Crisis of Modernity” Joseph Shaw mentions a study published in 2019, commissioned by the English Diocese of Portland. The Diocese actually questioned lapsed Catholics about the reasons they chose to leave the Church.
According to Shaw, “It reveals no clear pattern of people saying that they lapsed because the Church’s teaching was too conservative, let alone that they would return if it changed. On the contrary, many participants had been deeply demoralized by the failure of their local parish to engage with difficult teaching, and complained about parish catechists rubbishing the Church’s official positions.”
Shaw also observes that “What did surprise me from the survey was the result that 10 percent of respondents agreed or ‘strongly agreed’ with the statement “I prefer the Latin Mass but there is none in my area” “.
Two things I take from the results of that survey: 1) It looks like many if not most Catholics leave the Church not because Her teachings are too hard or too “old fashioned” and need updating, but because they can’t count on Her clergy and Her structures to reliably teach Her doctrine. And 2) I think we can see why, despite the staggering hemorrhage of faithful, we don’t see our feckless bishops commissioning replications of the Portland survey, trying to find out why folks really choose to abandon the Church, and how they might restore their dwindling flocks. They don’t like the truth. Instead they double down on what David WS aptly describes above as “sappy”, and the leaving continues…
Josh:
Why do they go? I go to see Jesus. Everybody else is a neighbor, maybe.
Lead Kindly Light
Mary said : “Do whatever He tells you.” Jesus has called only men to His Church because a man represents his whole family since Adam. If Adam, as head of his family had obeyed God all mankind would be walking with God in the evening in the Garden of Eden.
St Paul said: “Husbands love your wives…” as Jesus loves His Church.