Here is my review of Reagan (2024), the best film of a politician that I have seen. The usual warning as to spoilers is given.
There have been very few movies on American presidents. Washington’s presidency has been the focus of one miniseries in the eighties. Lincoln has only been the subject of a handful of movies. Theodore Roosevelt has a movie celebrating his role in organizing the Rough Riders, but only one movie about him as president, and that as a side character. Wilson has a movie focusing on his presidency, Wilson (1944), a box office failure. FDR has Sunrise at CampoBello which focuses on his struggle against the paralysis which afflicted him as an adult. World War 2 miniseries and movies have him as a side character. Movies on the remaining presidents tend to focus on one event in their presidencies, if that.
The Reagan movie breaks the mold in that it covers the entire arc of his eventful life. Dennis Quaid does a masterful job as Reagan. Superb makeup makes him look like Reagan and he manages the difficult job of successfully mimicking the very distinctive Reagan voice. Penelope Ann Miller becomes Nancy Reagan, a woman whose whole life was her love for her husband, and the love between her and Reagan is a constant focus of the film.
The movie is set in contemporary times with Jon Voight, as a retired KGB agent, explaining to a rising Russian politician how Reagan, who he calls The Crusader, was largely responsible for the destruction of the Soviet Union. Voight notes that it was the goal of Reagan to beat communism without firing a shot.
The movie follows Reagan from boyhood to his last horse ride, as Alzheimer’s takes its toll on Reagan. It is not a straight line progression, but events in Reagan’s life come up as Voight brings up some aspect of Reagan. It is an effective method in the film. Reagan brings out that Reagan became president not out of ambition, but in order to dismantle the Soviet Union and to free its subjects. Voight calls Reagan The Crusader because that is what he was.
I lived through the age of Reagan, my awareness of politics beginning as a small boy listening to Reagan’s speech on behalf of Barry Goldwater, and the movie captures well the look and sound of this time from the early sixties to the early nineties. Reagan’s career in politics is shown in vignettes as Voight discusses how Reagan rose to become president.
Few things are drier than politics. The film avoids this with heaps of humor, along with the drama, which fits Reagan’s constant use of humor to gently make his political points.
The film’s treatment of his presidency begins with Reagan’s almost assassination, only days into his first term, and his belief that God had preserved him for a purpose, and that whatever time he had left belonged to Him. Voight mentions how the friendship and alliance that Reagan struck with Pope John Paul II, with the help of the Iron Lady, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, sounded doom for the Soviet Union.
The film has a chilling sequence with Reagan in the war room in 1983, dealing with a nuclear alert in which it was thought that the Soviets were launching a pre-emptive first strike. It was caused by a flock of birds, with Reagan noting that the nuclear stand off with the Soviets was madness and would sooner or later end in annihilation of the Earth.
The film skillfully notes how Reagan used the Strategic Defense Initiative, “Star Wars”, to bring the Soviets to the negotiation table. In a comic sequence we see the funerals in rapid succession of Brezhnev (1982), Andropov (1984) and Chernenko (1985). With the accession of Gorbachev, the Soviets acknowledged, begrudgingly, that they could not keep up with the US in military technology, and Reagan, while happy to negotiate with Gorbachev, refused to give up SDI, leaving the Soviets to face the fact that they had to give up the arms race with the US, the major factor in the dissolution of the Soviet Union, after the failing Soviet economy.
The film deals tastefully with Reagan falling victim to Alzheimer’s, with Reagan taking one last horse ride, due to his failing faculties, a scene that is joyous rather than tragic.
Stick around for the ending credits for some good Easter eggs.
Reagan was not a conventionally religious man, but he was a man with a strong faith in God, and that permeates the entire film.
A great film, and a fitting tribute to our fortieth president, the greatest president of my life time. Highly recommended.
Looking foward to it!
Thank you Donald.
Thanks for the review. Dennis Quaid had a remarkable interview with EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo on his The World Over program Thursday night. Well worth seeing. Available on the EWTN website on demand.
Illinois has produced two of the greatest Presidents ever. And in 2016, we barely escaped producing what likely would have been one of the worst Presidents imaginable…except for the current one. Let’s hope we can do that trick again in 2024.
I can’t wait to see this. Penelope Ann Miller would make a great Nancy Reagan. Good to see a respectful movie made about a Conservative President. And glad that there are actors like Dennis Quaid unafraid to make them. Thanks for the review Donald.
Reagan so focused on bringing down communism everywhere but in the US. Also, started the illegal immigration tsunami by giving amnesty in exchange for nothing in a “deal” with Democrats.
I wonder if the KGB agent assigned to follow Reagan’s career was a literary function of the script to show his history or if he really had a Russian agent follow is life.
The scene where the elderly Evangelical pastor making a prophecy with a young Pat Boone huddling with Ronald and Nancy Reagan on the terrace was fun. Fun because the elderly Evangelical pastor was played by the actual Pat Boone!
I wasn’t sure how many people picked up on that Tito!
Probably several George. The KGB was quite thorough in keeping tabs on potential rising stars in the leadership of enemy nations.
Don,
I am almost certain that is him. I need to do a little more research, but I am sure it is him.
Reagan so focused on bringing down communism everywhere but in the US. Also, started the illegal immigration tsunami by giving amnesty in exchange for nothing in a “deal” with Democrats.
Reagan was quite concerned with domestic Communism, especially after his tangle with the Communists in Hollywood during his tenure as head of the Screen Actors Guild. Reagan started nothing in regard to illegal aliens. The problem was a trickle during his time and the Democrats are to blame for what it has become.
If I’m not mistaken, the amnesty deal was in exchange for some border funding. The money was soon gone but the regulation remained. In fact, due to liberal court decisions etc, there were still immigrants legalizing under this regulation in 2010!!!
Lesson here should be to NEVER trade legislation for money. You’ll lose every time.
Oh it was Boone Tito, although he was well disguised with the make up.
Would you consider Primary Colors to be a movie about a president?
No, due to its fictional nature.
I enjoyed reading the reviews. I wore Regan T – shirts during Trump’s first campaign and will wear them again beginning in October. Regan was appreciated most, I think, by all for his finesse in the use if language, which is something Trump could use more of; however they are an exact match when it comes to their love for this country and its people, which they both proved like too few presidents did. I am looking forward to seeing this film.
We saw this movie today. The portions dealing with his life in Hollywood seemed a bit weak but the depiction of his presidency was riveting, and Quaid really did his best at capturing Reagan in these sequences. One scene I found very touching showed Tip O’Neill at Reagan’s bedside after the assassination attempt, with a Rosary in his hands, obviously praying for the President’s recovery. (I could never in a million years imagine Nancy Pelosi doing the same for Trump, which goes to show how far we’ve fallen.)
[…] News, Punditry, and Analysis:Reagan the Movie: A Review – Donald R. McClarey, J.D., at The American […]