To paraphrase Churchill, the trinity for contemporary Jesuits is whiskey, sodomy and Leftist politics.
Never Another Jesuit Pope
- Donald R. McClarey
Donald R. McClarey
Cradle Catholic. Active in the pro-life movement since 1973. Father of three, one in Heaven, and happily married for 43 years. Small town lawyer and amateur historian. Former president of the board of directors of the local crisis pregnancy center for a decade.
…and the lash. But it could be with S and M or would the Jesuits call that mortification?
Jesuits are just Methodists that like the fancy robes. Excommunicate them all starting with the failure in Rome. They are a cancer to the world. Enjoy the sodomy here cause HELL is your destination. Not my judgement but your own choice. Leading others to sin is not a priestly job. Admonishing the sinner does not mean promoting the sin. How dumb are these clowns? Or is Satan their new hero? Or both?
I may have beaten the Babylon Bee to their next topic. Wait for it. Methodists Reject Jesuits as Too Traditional.
I know there exist faithful, orthodox Jesuits— they are a vanishing minority in that order, but they do exist. I’ve even met a few. Their fellow Jesuits are embarrassed for them, but they exist.
But as pitiful and decadent as that order has become, why on earth would any sane young man with a vocation pick that lot to join?
Unless they’re interested in them for the whiskey, sodomy and leftist politics…
Accountability.
The talent that was buried and made no interest was taken away and given to the servants who were diligent and true.
Before our very eyes we witness servants who bury their gifts. They know that the Master will return but they have a distorted concept on the who the Master is. Their passions and lust have blinded them.
What they have will be taken away from them and given to the ones who already have. The one’s who knew the Masters love and compassion. For they tried their best to imitate their Master while he was away.
Never another Jesuit. Disband the order.
The groups that plague America and the world have one overarching trait in common – they all think they’re so d— clever.
May God grant you and yours protection from the expert class!
Fr. James Martin posting a photo of him blessing two men holding hands goes against the document. Spontaneous? Oh. Wait… let’s get a photo of this.
At minute 13 and forward on the clip, the host of the video makes valid points regarding the ABUSES to a document that never was intended to be anything worthy of the office that it originated from.. but was written as a Trojan Horse of sorts.
Father Martin is proving my point.
https://www.youtube.com/live/CeZ04wdPdu4?si=JUpBh7t26kgG0gty
Easy to see why Jesuits, for centuries, were discouraged from seeking higher episcopal orders. Recent experiences have confirmed the wisdom of that policy.
It’s sad that many of our fellow Catholics won’t or refuse to see that Francis is allowing same sex blessings. What’s even sadder is the way Popesplainers like Armstrong, Akin, and Shea are reassuring them that this document isn’t allowing these blessings. Yet, James Martin, Jesuit gay advocate Supreme, a Pope Francis confident, knows exactly what it means.
[…] Ambiguity of FS Makes Way for Multiplying Misinterpretations – Fr. Raymond J. de Souza Never Another Jesuit Pope – Donald R. McClarey, Esq., at The American Catholic What Is a Couple? – Kennedy Hall […]
When people accept the reality that homosexuality is something that is neither chosen nor contagious (and, to boot, whether they remain celibate or enter relationships they’re not going to be producing children anyway) they will come to accept that gay relationships are of no threat to anyone. And yes, this is the first step towards acceptance, approval and the embracing of same gender relationships.
“to accept that gay relationships are of no threat to anyone.”
Unless you wish the Bible to be uncensored, to not have the government command the use of pronouns which are a lie, to have children chemically castrated, to have children as young toddlers subjected to gay propaganda, to have members of the opposite sex in communal bathrooms, to be forced to pretend that women can become men and men can become women, and to have freedom extinguished whenever it conflicts with the gay agenda of the moment.
Than you Donald. You said it all.
they will come to accept that gay relationships are of no threat to anyone.
==
The whole point of homosexual agitation has been to lower the status of normal human relationships and increase the status of deviant associations. There is no limiting principle to their activities, so they’re pretty much always a threat.
You’ll notice that a libertarian approach to homosexuality as a social phenomenon ca. 1963 would have been to agitate for changes in statutory law (say, limiting prosecutions for sodomy to cases of forcible compulsion, incapacitation by drugging, and violations of age-of-consent), changes in police procedure (an end to the use of <i>agents provacateurs</i> working under cover bar to disrupt organized crime and an end to raids on social gatherings absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity or violations of local ordinances on nuisances), and an end to categorical hire bars and categorical discharge in public employment. You might just find a Mattechine Society pamphlet from that era with that program. And nothing since. Because being free of police harassment was never the goal.
God is our Creator. He created sex. He, better than anyone, should know why He created the sex act. Being made male and female is part of our image and likeness, stated in Genesis and reinforced by Christ in Matthew 19. In the Bible God is very clear in declaring what the proper use of human sexuality is. It is interesting how little say the modernist members of the Church give to God the Creator over the sex act that He created.
Thank you, Donald. You said it all.
@John, the pro-homo-erotic commenter:
WHAT WILL GOD DO ABOUT FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS?
Malachi 2:1-3
1 And now, O priests, this command is for you. 2 If you will not listen, if you will not lay it to heart to give glory to my name, says the Lord of hosts, then I will send the curse on you and I will curse your blessings; indeed I have already cursed them, because you do not lay it to heart. 3 I will rebuke your offspring, and spread dung on your faces, the dung of your offerings, and I will put you out of my presence.
The use of the term “dung” in the NRSVCE and KJV translations for the Hebrew word “peres” in verse 3 above is particularly appropriate given the anal sex in which sodomites engage. I really don’t hate homosexuals at all because I was a submarine sailor fornicator of the worst sort. But I do despise, loathe, abhor, detest, and hold in utter disdain and contempt godless worthless useless demonic diabolical liberal progressives seeking to normalize – even sanctify – filthy dirty perverted sexual behavior. This is what St. Paul says about people like you, John, in Romans 1:32, “Though they know God’s decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not only do them but approve those who practice them.”
Art you nailed the whole homosexual agenda. It’s an agenda.
I’ll add that the push in homosexual acceptance serves to reduce the population. Yes, some have children through surrogacy but they will never have a family in the truest sense where there are 2,3,4 plus children. It will always be 1 (maybe 2) to fulfil a paternal or maternal desire and/or as an accessory to their lifestyle. That automatically limits mankind’s population numbers because a) it requires a female/male to participate in the IVF/pregnancy b) IVF is expensive.
The powers that be have gone to the ends of the earth, so to speak, to ensure that homosexuals are treated better with extra advantages. Beyond what’s reasonable. For a demographic group who contribute nothing to society through their homosexuality. Their homosexuality adds nothing to our world.
12 quotes against sodomy that every Catholic should know.
https://tfpstudentaction.org/blog/12-quotes-against-sodomy-that-every-catholic-should-know
Yes, I posted this on the Pontiff’s timeline at Terra Vaniloquentiae.
Indeed, Bruised Optimist. It’s very telling that in the newspaper ad above they advertise themselves as “smart Catholic”. The implication being that all Catholics who actually believe and try to live in accordance with the most basic Christian doctrines are “Dumb Catholics”.
If we do experience, Fire falling from the sky, as it did in Sodom, my guess is that homosexual acts and abortion will top the list for God not intervening to stop the catastrophe. For God doesn’t send the fire. Man sends it himself and if the Great God of Mercy holds back His angels from stopping this firestorm, we might not have to ponder too long as to why.
the following is from LQC’s link;
Saint John Chrysostom is considered the greatest of the Greek Fathers and was proclaimed Doctor of the Church. He was Archbishop and Patriarch of Constantinople, and his revision of the Greek liturgy is used until today. In his sermons about Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, he dwells on the gravity of the sin of homosexuality:
“But if thou scoffest at hearing of hell and believest not that fire, remember Sodom. For we have seen, surely we have seen, even in this present life, a semblance of hell. For since many would utterly disbelieve the things to come after the resurrection, hearing now of an unquenchable fire, God brings them to a right mind by things present. For such is the burning of Sodom, and that conflagration!…
“Consider how great is that sin, to have forced hell to appear even before its time!
I went back and read the thread of comments properly- I missed Dons comment to John – he perfectly states exactly why opposing normalising homosexuality as just two people of no threat is a flat lie. It’s a slippery slope that is becoming steeper by the day, until one day people like John will be defending adult and child sex. That’s what they are trying to get to. Deviance has no limits, it just gets more deviant and abhorrent. A civilised society does not normalise deviance and perversion. It does not push the boundaries of decency.