https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1506458533625225219
And the cancellation of half of humanity proceeds apace. Her curt answer also says she is a snot who always believes she is the smartest person in any room. You do not want snotty judges, I can say that from decades of experience, making any rulings which impact you. Stolen elections have consequences.
Update:
Hattip to commenter Nate Winchester. Well known Leftist apologist Mark Shea chimes in to support a woman who will be a certain vote for abortion and the persecution of Catholics in particular and Christians in general:
How about that English lady that said: “ i’m not a veterinarian but I know what the dog is-“.
Let’s put her on the Court.
Welcome to the coulrocracy! [seen at Instapundit]
The ideocracy was bad enough.
Her history of aiding convicted pedophiles and child pornographers is disqualifying. Yes, even now in 2022, God save the USA!
Her curt answer also says she is a snot who always believes she is the smartest person in any room.
You mean she’s a standard-issue professional class leftoid.
I find snotty judges usually in the minority Art even among liberal judges. They are a pain to almost all who appear in front of them.
The levelers are at it again and it appears that another of their own will be seated on the high court.
Snotty judges, my version:
Mid-August in St. Louis, in the downtown Civil Courts building. No air conditioning (this was about 1984 or 1985; don’t know if they have put in a/c since I moved away in 1997.) Most judges allowed men to remove their suit or sport coats when it got really hot. (On this day it was in the upper 90’s with typical St. Louis humidity, about 80%.). Not this guy. After I was actually shouted at from the bench for merely asking if we could doff our jackets, we proceeded with voir dire for about two hours. Everyone in the courtroom (a small one, capacity around 75) was sweating profusely.
We settled the darned case rather than continue in that environment. Maybe that was his objective all along. 😂
Frank,
I had a train case in Chicago three decades ago. Up against a fairly large firm. The Federal Judge, the notorious Brian Duff who resigned a step ahead of impeachment in 1996, would always begin his hearings with an angry tirade if he saw a coat in the courtroom, yelling that all coats belonged in the cloak room. Next time I hid a smile when my worthy adversary wailed in the cloak room that someone had stolen his coat!
I guess in fairness to the late Judge Duff I should link to this article which appeared when he resigned:
https://chicagoreader.com/news-politics/much-maligned-magistrate/
“The fault, dear Chezami, is not in our Senators,
But in your mind, that you are delusional.”
So, she’s not a biologist. Neither is she, AFAIK, a physical anthropologist. Can she define “black”, which is a far more diverse genotype/phenotype than is “woman”?
Donald M, thanks for the chuckles. And I had forgotten all about Judge Duff.