Vice Presidential nominee Senator Kamala Harris (D.Ca.) stated in the Vice Presidential debate of October 7, 2020, that Abraham Lincoln did not appoint a Supreme Court nominee close to his re-election because such a nomination would have been unfair. She badly mangles the relevant history in making this claim.
Chief Justice Roger Taney died on October 12, 1864. At 87 he still holds the record of oldest serving Chief Justice. His tenure as Chief Justice at 28 years was the second longest, surpassed only by that of John Marshall.
Nominated as Chief Justice by his friend President Andrew Jackson, his tenure is considered by historians to be highly significant for the Court. Although he had authored many important decisions, he is remembered today only for one: Dred Scott. Taney, a slave owner, had mirrored the tragic trajectory of the views of the South in regard to slavery in his own life. As a young man he regarded slavery as a blot on our national character, as he said in his opening argument in defense of a Methodist minister accused in 1819 of inciting slave insurrections. He emancipated his own slaves. However, by the time he authored the Dred Scott decision in 1857 he would write:
It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in regard to that unfortunate race which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted; but the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken. They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far unfit that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.
Taney thought that the decision in Dred Scott would settle the slavery issue in regard to the territories and remove it from politics. Instead the decision inflamed public opinion North and South and manifestly helped bring on the Civil War. Taney lived to see his nation riven by Civil War and an administration in power dedicated to restoring the Union and abolishing slavery, and more than willing to ignore the paper edicts of Taney’s court when necessary. Old and sick, Taney remained on the bench, unwilling to have Lincoln name his successor, a living relic of a bygone era.
Taney had watched in bitter frustration as Lincoln appointed four justices to the Court. With Taney’s death, Lincoln had his fifth and final appointment.
Lincoln did not appoint a replacement because Congress was not in session. After Congress came back into session on December 5, 1864, Lincoln nominated Salmon P. Chase, his former Secretary of the Treasury to be the new Chief Justice on December 6. The Republican controlled Senate confirmed him the same day. (If we are looking to Lincoln for precedents as to Supreme Court nominations, perhaps the Senate should forego any hearings and simply confirm Amy Coney Barrett?)
The most striking contemporary mention of Roger Taney was by the late Justice Antonin Scalia in his dissent in Planned Parenthood v. Casey:
“So the tears of joy we shed when we elected Barack Obama, and then my little godson’s tears tonight, because we might have elected Donald Trump — this is some sh–!”
-Kamala Harris November of 2016.
No Kamala. Your some sh–!
I pity your grandson.
Tanney was also the first Catholic ever appointed to SCOTUS.
Correct Tito.
I pity your grandson.
She’s childless. I think her husband may have children. Notable about this year’s crop of Democratic candidates is the fertility deficit, Biden excepted. Willys Ho’, Booty-gag, Klobberherworkers, Princess Spreading Bull, and Red Bernie have 4 children between them (and Bernie never had custody of his ba*tard son).
Art Deco.
Godson…my mistake.
As far as the party of death is concerned, not having offspring is kosher. Being a Godson of Kamala?
That’s frightening.
I’ve always admired the late Justice Scalia’s prose— both for its content and for its clarity. Years ago I bought a copy of his book Scalia Dissents, which includes his dissenting opinion excerpted above. We lost a brilliant legal mind when he died.
Scalia is one of the few Supreme Court Justices who can be read just for the pleasure of it. Most Justices, and most attorneys, write like packing clerks. One reason I blog is because I noticed that my style was deteriorating with the amount of legal writing I do each week. It is death on style.