Jimmy Akin must have had a bet with someone who dared him to write a post that got more comments than the Fr. Corapi stuff. This may not beat the Corapi story, but this should get . . . interesting before all is said and done.
Jimmy’s post is titled “Should America Elect a Polytheist Who Claims to Be a Christian?” If you’re not sure who he is referring to, I’ll let him explain:
In various races, we might be asked to vote for candidates who are Mormon.
While they may be very nice people and may even share many values with Christians, Mormons are not Christians. They do not have valid baptism because they are polytheists. That is, they believe in multiple gods. This so affects their understanding of the baptismal formula that it renders their administration of baptism invalid and prevents them from becoming Christians when they attempt to administer the sacrament.
Unlike other polytheists (e.g., Hindus, Shintoists), Mormons claim to be Christian.
Casting a vote for a Mormon candidate thus means casting one’s vote for a polytheist who present himself to the world as a Christian.
He goes on to argue that voting for a Mormon in a national election poses grave concerns.
It would not only spur Mormon recruitment efforts in numerous ways, it would mainstreamize the religion in a way that would deeply confuse the American public about the central doctrine of the Christian faith. It would give the public the idea that Mormons are Christian (an all-too-frequent misunderstanding as it is) and that polytheism is somehow compatible with Christianity.
In other words, it would deal a huge blow to the American public’s already shaky understanding of what Christianity is.
That means it would massively compromise a fundamental value on the scale of the abortion issue.
Jimmy writes that he’d sit out an election between a Mormon and a pro-abortion candidate.