Libertarianism
Paul Ryan and Catholic Social Teaching (Roundup)
In articles, interviews and addresses, U.S. Representative Paul Ryan is defending — not without controversy — his 2013 budget proposal (see “The Path to Prosperity: A Blueprint for American Renewal”) as an application of Catholic social teaching, inspired by his Catholic faith.
In an April 10 interview with CBN News, Ryan responded:
To me, the principle of subsidiarity, which is really federalism, meaning government closest to the people governs best, having a civil society of the principal of solidarity where we, through our civic organizations, through our churches, through our charities, through all of our different groups where we interact with people as a community, that’s how we advance the common good. By not having big government crowd out civic society, but by having enough space in our communities so that we can interact with each other, and take care of people who are down and out in our communities.Those principles are very very important, and the preferential option for the poor, which is one of the primary tenants of Catholic social teaching, means don’t keep people poor, don’t make people dependent on government so that they stay stuck at their station in life. Help people get out of poverty out onto life of independence.
The U.S. Bishops Conference conveyed their thoughts on the FY2013 Budget and spending bills, which in their words “repeated and reinforced the bishops’ ongoing call to create a “circle of protection” around poor and vulnerable people and programs that meet their basic needs and protect their lives and dignity.”:
Bishops Blaire [chairman of the bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development] and Pates reaffirmed the “moral criteria to guide these difficult budget decisions” outlined in their March 6 budget letter:1.Every budget decision should be assessed by whether it protects or threatens human life and dignity.
2.A central moral measure of any budget proposal is how it affects “the least of these” (Matthew 25). The needs of those who are hungry and homeless, without work or in poverty should come first.
3.Government and other institutions have a shared responsibility to promote the common good of all, especially ordinary workers and families who struggle to live in dignity in difficult economic times…
Just solutions, however, must require shared sacrifice by all, including raising adequate revenues, eliminating unnecessary military and other spending, and fairly addressing the long-term costs of health insurance and retirement programs.
In April 16 and April 17 letters to the House Agriculture Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee addressing cuts required by the budget resolution, Bishop Blaire said “The House-passed budget resolution fails to meet these moral criteria.”
Marc Thiessen defended the congressman from “a bishop’s unjust attack” (Washington Post, 4/23/12) along with (Fr. Robert Sirico (of the Acton Institute) — the latter, however, disagreeting with Ryan’s equasion of subsidiarity with federalism.
This past week, U.S. Representative Paul Ryan further presented his case in a column for the National Catholic Register: Applying Our Enduring Truths to Our Defining Challenge, April 25, 2012):
As a congressman and Catholic layman, I am persuaded that Catholic social truths are in accord with the “self-evident truths” our Founders bequeathed to us in the founding ideas of America: independence, limited government and the dignity and freedom of every human person. As chairman of the House Budget Committee, I am tasked with applying these enduring principles to the urgent social problems of our time: an economy that is not providing enough opportunities for our citizens, a safety net that is failing our most vulnerable populations, and a crushing burden of debt that is threatening our children and grandchildren with a diminished future. … [read more]
On April 26th, Paul Ryan gave a lecture at Georgetown University, entitled “America’s Enduring Promise”, in which he once again addressed the challenge of America’s exploding federal debt, which he characterized as “the overarching threat to our society today”:
The Holy Father, Pope Benedict, has charged that governments, communities, and individuals running up high debt levels are “living at the expense of future generations” and “living in untruth.”We in this country still have a window of time before a debt-fueled economic crisis becomes inevitable. We can still take control before our own needy suffer the fate of Greece. How we do this is a question for prudential judgment, about which people of good will can differ.
If there was ever a time for serious but respectful discussion, among Catholics as well as those who don’t share our faith, that time is now.
Ryan’s appearance at Georgetown was prefaced by a scathing letter from some 80 members of the faculty irate over his alleged “continuing misuse of Catholic teaching to defend a budget plan that decimates food programs for struggling families, radically weakens protections for the elderly and sick, and gives more tax breaks to the wealthiest few.” An organized protest of Ryan on the actual day of the event was distinguished by a notable lack of participation. Continue reading →
It Takes A Family
I recently completed Rick Santorum’s It Takes A Family. I quipped on Twitter that had I read this before the campaign started then Santorum would have been my top Rick pick before that other Rick entered the race (though I still maintain that Governor Perry would have been an outstanding nominee, but no need to go there). At times Santorum slips into politician speak – you know, those occasions when politicians feel compelled to tell stories of individual people in order to justify some larger agenda. And some of the book is a little plodding, especially when he gets into wonkish mode (which fortunately is not all that often). Those quibbles asides, there are large chunks of this book that could very well have been written by yours truly. That isn’t meant to be a commentary on my own genius, but rather a way of saying I agree with just about everything this man has to say.
The book title really says it all. The heart of Rick Santorum’s political philosophy is the family, meaning that to him strong families are the heart of any functioning society. The family has been undermined both by big government programs and by the culture at large. Santorum mocks the “village elders” who view more government programs as the solution to all problems. Santorum acknowledges that many of the problems we face don’t have quick and easy fixes, and often no legislative action can be taken. Santorum offers a series of small policy proposals that are aimed at giving parents and individuals in tough economic circumstances some tools to help, but he also emphasizes the doctrine of subsidiarity. Ultimately we must rely principally on local institutions, starting with the family.
Santorum understands what even some on the right fail to appreciate, and that is we can’t divorce social issues from economics. The breakdown of the family coincides directly with economic hardship. If we want a healthier economy, we need healthier families. It’s a central tenet of conservatism that is somehow ignored by large swathes of the political right.
His approach to politics can be summarized in a passage on page 341 of the hardback edition: Continue reading →
You Mean Rick Santorum is Not a Libertarian? Burn Him at the Stake!
I’m going to need to recant my placement of RedState at the top of my favorite blogs list. Now that Rick Santorum has emerged as probably the leading not-Mitt candidate in the GOP presidential sweepstakes, they, along with a few other conservative websites, have gone absolutely bananas over the prospect of Santorum becoming a leading candidate. Sure, they all hate Mitt Romney, but can we truly tolerate a candidate who says extremist things like this:
This whole idea of personal autonomy, well I don’t think most conservatives hold that point of view. Some do. They have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulations low, that we shouldn’t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn’t get involved in cultural issues. You know, people should do whatever they want. Well, that is not how traditional conservatives view the world and I think most conservatives understand that individuals can’t go it alone.
My goodness. I can just see Santorum delivering these remarks on a balcony with a hammer and sickle proudly displayed behind him. Did he also poound a shoe on the podium, because the man must surely be just shy of being an out and out Communist.
Jeff Emanuel has unearthed two more shocking quotes that reveal Santorum’s obvious Stalinist tendencies. Continue reading →
Big Government? No. Big Exaggerations? Yes.
Now that Rick Santorum has basically tied Mitt Romney in the Iowa caucus, the knives are really out for Rick. On the one hand, he will undoubtedly experience a surge in the polls and in fundraising. On the other hand, as every conservative who has ascended in the polls has before, he will face a firestorm of criticism from both left and right. I discussed this in my post yesterday, and now things have only gone into overdrive. As someone who reads secular conservative blogs, there is a lot of concern that Santorum is some kind of “big government” conservative. I think this is absurd, as does a pretty famous conservative figure not known for particularly liking big government types: Rush Limbaugh. Here’s what he had to say about the big government charge on his program today: Continue reading →
Libertarian Social Justice: Trees Make A Forest
Yesterday, I was having a discussion with some of my fellow Catholics about the presidential election, and there arose a brief debate about the concept of libertarianism. It never ceases to amaze me when I see committed Catholics embracing libertarianism…but then, I remember, most of them probably were not catechized very well. Also, we should take into consideration that for years many of us have been rightly troubled by a far-reaching government engaged in what the Catholic faithful invariably see as injustice. I suppose I can understand why many Catholics might think that libertarianism is a legitimate way to put that unjust government in check. Though well-intentioned, they have fallen into a snare.
Stephen Metcalf writes at Slate today about what he calls ‘The Liberty Scam’. His article is essentially a rebuke of libertarianism, at least as he believes it was defined by Robert Nozik. David Boaz at CATO Institute takes issue with him on that point.
It’s interesting that Boaz makes a couple of arguments against Metcalf’s article that I’ve grown accustomed to hearing from libertarians in response to criticisms of their ideology. In a nutshell, first, we who are opposed to libertarianism are apparently not allowed to claim that one of their heroes can be said to have defined it with any certainty. We find this in Boaz’s seeming annoyance with those who believe they have “grappled with libertarian ideas” if they have read Nozik. Secondly, if we disagree with the libertarian ideas set forth, it automatically means that we are misunderstanding it, hence Boaz’s headline ‘Misunderstanding Nozik, Again‘.
Unfortunately, again, the libertarian runs up against the wall of reality and finds himself stunned.
As for Metcalf’s final complaint that advocates of a more expansive state have been “hectored into silence” by the vast libertarian power structure, well, I am, if not hectored, at least stunned into silence.
Libertarians frequently cannot see the forest because the trees get in their way. How dare we think that libertarians have a shared value system that results in any kind of society that has power! Hence we see a self-refuting principle in libertarianism. Human beings are “social animals”, if you will. They will, invariably, join together with like-minded people to bring about political change that reflects their views of justice. All such associations are “societies”, whether or not they are governmental or political. One need look no further than one of the infamous episodes of astro-turfing for Ron Paul in straw polls and the various Campaign for Liberty rallies to see a libertarian act of “social justice”, per se. The very act of joining a campaign is an act of joining a power structure to bring about one’s sense of “justice”. Granted, libertarian “social justice” is nothing like the Left’s “social justice”, but that is neither here nor there.
Metcalf paraphrases Nozik, the libertarian who apparently either doesn’t speak for libertarianism or is misunderstood?:
To the entire left, Nozick, in effect, said: Your social justice comes at an unacceptable cost, namely, to my personal liberty…
This is, to be sure, the libertarians’ basic argument. Ironically, the libertarian movement’s social justice is similarly problematic in that it so frequently promotes license over liberty. As Mortimer Adler has written:
Herein lies the distinction between liberty and license. Liberty is freedom exercised under the restraints of justice so that its exercise results in injury to no one. In contrast license is freedom exempt from the restraints of justice and. therefore, injurious to others in infringing their freedom as well as violating other rights. When no distinction is made between liberty and license, the freedom of the strong an destroy the freedom of the weak.
Most Catholics still understand on some level that abortion and same-sex “marriage” are opposed to true justice. As such, they are opposed to authentic liberty. Just as we know that the word “choice” is misused in the abortion debate to preserve a license to kill, we should also understand that the word “liberty” is used by libertarians to preserve license on any number of issues, including abortion and the re-definition of marriage.
If you take nothing else away from this article, know this. There is a libertarian movement. It exists. It has arisen as its own society, a social group being made up of individuals who share a common definition of “justice”. Their common view of “justice” is the act of joining together in a society to oppose those who would seek to bring about “social justice” which they view as a monster because the Left’s version of “social justice” is, in fact, a monster. In other words, the libertarians have engaged themselves in an exercise in hypocrisy.
What’s a Catholic to do? Well, we can begin by helping people to understand what authentic social justice is. (Sorry, libertarian Catholics, but that’s the way it is.) Certainly, all Americans are able to make a decision to either be complacent (that is, to be the “sleeping giant”) or to actively work through the political process to bring about a society that reflects our view of justice. Catholics are not free to be complacent. We each have a duty to be politically involved….to enter into associations with others to work for authentic social justice. It is my hope and prayer that we can do so as One Body. The more we talk about these issues in peace with each other, the better.
Hat-tip, Memeorandum.
Somalia, Libertarian Paradise!
This video is dedicated to Drs. Rand and Ron Paul!
(With all due respect to my libertarian colleagues, I couldn’t resist posting this video)
Hat Tip: Lisa Graas
Ralph and Ron: An Ideological Alliance?
I’m never going to be excited about major party politics. When we come to the finish line, I will hold my nose and vote for the lesser evil, since I don’t see the harm in using my vote. But I’m not going to sit around and speculate about which mainstream GOP or Democratic politician is going to be the frontrunner for 2012. I’ll let others worry about that.
I’d rather focus on the men of principle who sometimes get involved in these races, even though they have no chance of winning. Independent or “outsider” candidates and their campaigns serve a couple of vital functions: they bring viewpoints delegitimized and mocked by the main news sources on the left and right to the forefront, which in turn reminds us that we still live in a relatively free country and haven’t become a fascist dictatorship like China. They can also put some pressure on the major party candidates to take certain issues more seriously.
Recently Judge Andrew Napolitano, the only man on the major networks I can bear to listen to for more than a few minutes, invited Ron Paul and Ralph Nader on his show to discuss the issues and discover the extent to which “progressives” such as Nader and libertarians such as Paul can agree on them. I wasn’t surprised to discover that they agree on quite a bit, as you will see if you watch the video above.
Apologia Pro Libertarianism Sua
There’s been a bit of discussion about the nature of libertarianism on the blog recently, and as the resident pseudo-libertarian, I thought I would re-state where I come down on the matter (this is based largely on an older post I did on the subject, which sadly is now lost in the cyber-ether).
To understand where I am coming from, one needs to make a distinction between political positions held as a matter of moral principle, and those held as a matter of prudence. Take the issue of torture. One might oppose the use of torture on the grounds that it’s not a good way to get information from suspects, or because by using torture on the enemy you risk retaliation by the enemy on your people, etc. Alternatively one might believe that torture is just immoral, and you should do it regardless of whether or not it is effective.
Call the first type of objection to torture “pragmatic” and the second “principled.” (A person might object to torture on both pragmatic and principled grounds, in which case the opposition would be principled, though buttressed by pragmatic considerations). Dividing the justifications for various political positions into principled or pragmatic can be sometimes tricky, but the basic idea is, I hope, intuitive enough.
A principled libertarian, as I use the term, is someone who holds libertarian political beliefs for principled reasons. Taxation is theft, my body, my business, etc. In my experience, when you say libertarian this is what people think of. Continue reading →
On Distributism and the Futility of Third Ways
The search for an economic and political “third way” has haunted intellectuals for over a hundred years in the Western nations. Many forget that fascism was at one time considered a viable “third way” between liberal capitalism and communism, preserving for the most part private ownership of the means of production for profit but subjecting it to near total control and regulation by the state. Many other models would follow, from the local and anarchistic to the national and statist, appearing under many different names.
I too was caught up in the desperate search for a “third way”, as are many Catholics who eventually find their way to Distributism. But it became quite obvious to me that what people who actually defined themselves as libertarians and capitalists were promoting and defending really wasn’t what I had always thought it was, nor was it anything I could possibly find objectionable.
Catholic Distributarianism: A Preemptive FAQ
I’ll begin by stating that part of the blame or praise for this post ought to go to Christopher Blosser and David Jones for their excellent overview and commentary on the ongoing political/economic dispute between Catholic Distributists and Catholic libertarians.
I wish I could easily come up with a logical, smooth flow to all of these points. But really I just want to get them out there, no matter how disjointed in appearance.
Finally, I really mean it this time: we will have a respectful discussion on this topic, or none at all. That means certain people and their comments will likely be banned from the discussion. It will not be possible to avoid charges of “being afraid” to debate with such indestructible champions of the one true political philosophy, given their amazing ability to rule out all other possible reasons, including their coarse and offensive personal behavior, as to why no one wishes to engage in discussions with them. C’est la vie.
The best way to contribute here, though, is to ask questions that I can answer for this FAQ!
*
Where does the word “Distributarian” come from?
The word “Distributarian” was pejoratively applied to me and a few others who have attempted to blend libertarian and Distributist ideas by those not so enamored with the project. Since I see it as a good thing, I don’t mind wearing the label as a badge of honor.
What is a Distributarian?
It is one who does not see a necessary conflict between the basic propositions of Distributism and libertarianism, and insofar as possible, seeks to incorporate both of them into their social vision.
What are these propositions?
The following propositions are both necessary and sufficient for each ideology:
Of Distributism: property should be as widely distributed as possible.
Of libertarianism: social relationships should be as voluntary as possible.
Naturally some doctrinaires will dislike the wording “as ___ as possible”; why should we care about what is possible when great ideas are at stake? Either they exist full-fledged without imperfection in the world or they may as well not exist at all! If we move past this childish expectation and begin with the possible, I think we will find that there is no contradiction between these propositions.
Distributism and libertarianism challenge each other in a good way. Distributism challenges libertarianism to move beyond individual autonomy and articulate a vision of the common good; libertarianism challenges Distributism to clearly articulate how property distribution ought to come about – through force, or through consent?
Not only do they challenge each other; they compliment each other. Property owners will thrive in an environment of economic freedom; genuine liberty will thrive as it is rooted in solid social institutions based upon private property. As property ownership will increase the self-sufficiency of individuals, families, and communities, it will decrease dependency upon the state.
Read the rest and comment here.
And please note that this is a work in progress!
Subscribe by email!
Vatican Endorsed & Imprimatur
Recent Posts
- Blogburst Friday – Political Thuggery II: The Brett Kimberlin Saga
- John Ford, John Wayne and Grierson’s Raid
- Küüünnng!
- More Movies For a Memorial Day Weekend
- Pro-Aborts at Record Low
- The Old Issue and Our Issue
- Margeaux’s Stand: Catholic Teen Defends Her Right to Attend Mass
- Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter the Movie!
- Catholic Vote Beclowns Itself for Romney
- See You In Court Mr. Obama
- Liberalism & Natural Law: A Response
- Is the American press anti-Catholic?
- Georgetown: the Anti-Catholic Catholic University
- Pope Leo The Great on the Ascension
- Musical Offering
Visitors to our website
Archives
- May 2012 (75)
- April 2012 (99)
- March 2012 (107)
- February 2012 (113)
- January 2012 (102)
- December 2011 (85)
- November 2011 (81)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (80)
- August 2011 (78)
- July 2011 (65)
- June 2011 (83)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (84)
- March 2011 (98)
- February 2011 (87)
- January 2011 (90)
- December 2010 (91)
- November 2010 (106)
- October 2010 (102)
- September 2010 (101)
- August 2010 (89)
- July 2010 (106)
- June 2010 (136)
- May 2010 (112)
- April 2010 (131)
- March 2010 (55)
- February 2010 (98)
- January 2010 (114)
- December 2009 (105)
- November 2009 (123)
- October 2009 (102)
- September 2009 (116)
- August 2009 (110)
- July 2009 (109)
- June 2009 (102)
- May 2009 (46)
- April 2009 (126)
- March 2009 (104)
- February 2009 (90)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (76)
- November 2008 (126)
- October 2008 (103)
Catholic and Infertile
Catholic Arts & Beauty
Catholic Blogroll
- A Catholic Mom in Hawaii
- Against The Grain
- An Examined Life
- and sometimes tea
- Biblical Evidence for Cthlcsm
- Bonfire of the Vanities
- Cahiers Péguy
- Catholatarian
- Catholic Light
- Catholic Phoenix
- Catholic Translations
- Coffee and Canticles
- Conversion Diary
- CVSTOS FIDEI
- Disputations
- Fidelity to the Word
- Head Noises
- la nouvelle théologie
- Mary Meets Dolly
- Over the Rhine and into the Tiber
- Per Christum
- Pro Ecclesia
- Riparians at the Gate
- Sacramentum Vitae
- SoCon or Bust
- The Catholic Comedy
- The Catholic Key Blog
- The Divine Life
- The Minor Premise
- This Cross I Embrace
- Video Meliora
- Vivificat!
- Whosoever Desires
Catholic Economics Links
Catholic Environmental Links
Catholic Film & TV Production
Catholic Forums
Catholic Health Care Links
Catholic Law Links
Catholic Music
Catholic Mysticism
Catholic Newpapers
Catholic Pro-Marriage Links
Catholic Punditry
- American Papist
- Catholatarian
- Catholic and Enjoying It!
- Catholic Fire
- Creative Minority Report
- Crisis Magazine
- CVSTOS FIDEI
- Damian Thompson
- DarwinCatholic
- Dyspeptic Mutterings
- Father John Zuhlsdorf
- George Weigel
- Journeys in Alterity
- Lair of the Catholic Cavemen
- National Catholic Register
- Opinionated Catholic
- Pro Ecclesia
- RealCatholicTV.com
- Standing on My Head
- Ten Reasons
- The Catholic Thing
- The Pertinacious Papist
- ThePulp.it
- Thoughts of a Regular Guy
Catholic Radio
Catholic Religious Orders
Catholic Resources
- African-American Outreach
- Biblical Evidence for Catholicism
- Black Catholic History
- Byzantine Cthlc Church (US)
- Catechism (CCC)
- Catholic Encyclopedia
- Catholic Hierarchy
- Catholic Latin Mass
- Catholic Leadership Institute
- Catholic Search Engine
- Catholic Theology Resources
- Catholic Translations
- Compendium of the CCC
- Early Christian Writings
- flockNote
- Mass Times
- National Cthlc AIDS Network
- Natl Black Cthlc Congress
- Natural Procreative Tchnlgy
- Papal Encyclicals
- Pope Benedict XVI Fan Club
- Pope John Paul II Writings
- QuoteCatholic
- Sancta Missa
- Sonitus Sanctus
- Universalis
- USCCB
- Vatican: English Site
- Vatican: Latin Site
Catholic Social Justice Links
Catholic SSA Links
Catholic TV Links
Catholic Young Adult
Catholic Youth Links
Orthodox Blogroll
Other Christian Blogs
Other Christian Resources
Secular Websites
- Advocates for Homeschooling – HSLDA
- Almost Chosen People
- American Cancer Society
- American Conservative
- American Education Reform
- American Life League
- American Red Cross
- Americans for Fair Tax
- Americans United for Life
- Amrcn Conservative Union
- Amrcn Health Care Reform
- Apostolate of Roman Catholic Homeschoolers – A.R.C.H.
- Asian Conservatives
- Athens and Jerusalem
- Autism Society of America
- Big Government
- Big Hollywood
- Black Genocide
- Blue Dog Democrats
- Breast Cancer Prevention Inst
- Breitbart
- C-SPAN
- Care Net Pro Life Clinics
- Citizens for Term Limits
- Coaltn on Abort/Brst Cncr
- Concerned Women/America
- Conservatives/Patients Rts
- Consistent Life
- Defend Marriage
- Dem Congrsnl Campaign Cte
- Dem Lgsltv Campaign Cte
- Dem Senatrl Campaign Cmte
- Democratic Gov Assoc
- Democratic Ldrshp Council
- Democratic Natl Convention
- Democratic Party
- Democrats for Life
- Dems for Education Reform
- Economic Policy Institute
- Energy Independence Now
- Face AIDS
- Fair Economy
- Faithful Democrats
- Fathers for Good
- Fathers for Life
- Feminists for Life
- GayPatriot
- Go Green Initiative
- GOProud
- Health Care/Homeless
- House Democrats
- Invisible Children
- Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles
- Make Poverty History
- Mediaite
- Mercy Corps
- Murder Vctms Fams/Rcncltn
- National Black Pro Life Union
- National Right to Life
- National Right to Work
- Natl Rep Cngrssnl Cte
- Natl Rep Senatorial Cmte
- NC/Abolish Death Penalty
- NewsBusters
- Nurses for Life
- Pave the Way Foundation
- PeaceCorps
- Physicians for Life
- Politico
- Poverty.com
- Pro-Life America
- Project 21
- Project Vote Smart
- Pure Love Club
- Raging Elephants
- RealClearBooks
- RealClearMarkets
- RealClearPolitics
- RealClearWorld
- reason.tv
- Redeem The Vote
- Rep State Leadership Cmte
- Repub for Envmntl Protec…
- Republican Gov Assoc
- Republican Jewish Coalition
- Republican Ldshp Cncl
- Republican Natl Convention
- Republican Party
- Repubs for Single Payer
- Ross Douthat
- Save Darfur
- SBA List
- Senate Democrats
- Stand Firm
- Stop Human Trafficking
- Suggest Ideas
- Suicide Prevention
- The Art of Manliness
- The Buck Stops Here
- The Daily Caller
- The Medievalist
- The Other McCain
- The Polycarp Research Inst.
- The White House
- US House of Representatives
- US Senate
- What’s Wrong With the World
- Women in Congress
Tag Cloud
TAC works best with these browsers:



Recent Comments
(5 minutes ago)
(10 minutes ago)
(12 minutes ago)
(15 minutes ago)
(17 minutes ago)
(17 minutes ago)
(1 hours ago)
(1 hours ago)
(1 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)
(3 hours ago)
(3 hours ago)
(4 hours ago)