The Angel of Hadley

Tuesday, October 18, AD 2016

The town of Hadley was alarmed by the Indians in 1675, in the time of public worship, and the people were in the utmost confusion. Suddenly a grave, elderly person appeared in the midst of them. In his mien and dress he differed from the rest of the people. He not only encouraged them to defend themselves, but put himself at their head, rallied, instructed and led them on to encounter the enemy, who by this means were repulsed. As suddenly the deliverer of Hadley disappeared. The people were left in consternation, utterly unable to account for this strange phenomenon. It is not probable that they were ever able to explain it. If Goffe had been then discovered, it must have come to the knowledge of those persons, who declare by their letters that they never knew what became of him.

Thomas Hutchinson, History of Massachusetts Bay (1764)

Three of the regicides who sentenced Charles I to death took refuge in New England after the Restoration:  John Dixwell, Major General Edward Whalley and his son-in-law Major General William Goffe.  Goffe and Whalley were both experienced soldiers, having fought throughout the English Civil Wars.  They had also both served as Major Generals in Cromwell’s scheme to have Major Generals rule ten administrative districts in England, the only period of military dictatorship in English history.  All three of the regicides found refuge in New Haven, Connecticut.   Living under the assumed name of James David, Dixwell lived in peace in New Haven until his death in 1689.   Not so Whalley and Goffe who were too well known.  On the run, they ultimately found refuge in the frontier settlement of Hadley, Massachusetts.  Whalley probably died in 1675 while Goffe probably passed away in 1679. 

Continue reading...

King Philip

Tuesday, February 5, AD 2013

King Philip was there, wild and proud as he had been in life, with the great gash in his head that gave him his death wound.

Stephen Vincent Benet, The Devil and Daniel Webster

In his short story The Devil and Daniel Webster, Benet has Satan conjure up the damned souls of 12 villains from American history to serve as a jury in the case of Satan v. Jabez Stone. Only seven of these entities are named. This is the fifth in a series giving brief biographies of these men. Go here to read the biography of Simon Girty, here to read the “biography” of the Reverend John Smeet,  here to read the biography of Major Walter Butler and here to read the biography of Thomas Morton.  Our focus today is on King Philip.

Metacom, known to the white settlers as King Philip, was the second son of Massasoit, sachem of the Wampanoag, who had helped the Pilgrims survive during the first years of the colony.  He became chief in 1662 when his brother Wamsutta, King Alexander, died.  King Philip attempted to preserve peace with the whites.  The Wampanoag were in a bad strategic situation, squeezed between ever-increasing white settlements in the East and an ever-expanding Iroquois Confederacy in the West.  King Philip made major concessions to the whites, but war came anyway.

The great war of Seventeenth Century New England, King Philip’s War raged from 1675-1678 with the New England colonists, now numbering about 80,000, and their Mohican and Pequot allies confronting the  Wampanoag, Nipmuck, Podunk, Narragansett and Nashaway tribes.  The war was savage on both sides, with quarter rarely given.

The conflict began due to the suspicions of the New England colonists that Metacomet, named by them King Philip, Grand Sachem of the Wampanoag Confederacy, was attempting to rally the Indian tribes of New England into a great alliance for war against the whites.  John Sassamon, a Christian Indian, graduate of Harvard and an advisor to Metacomet, informed the Governor of Plymouth colony of this plan.  Metacomet was brought to trial in Plymouth.  Lacking evidence the court merely warned him that further rumors of plots by him could lead to severe consequences for the Wampanoag. 

Continue reading...

6 Responses to King Philip

  • “The winter of 1975-1676 “?

  • Thank you for noting the error Mike! I have corrected it.

  • Selling Metacom’s wife and young child into slavery was a particularly disgusting act of retribution. Perhaps Benet should’ve included the folks that did that on his jury of the damned, as I have little doubts as to the eternal reward of such people.

  • Pingback: WEDNESDAY GOD & CAESAR EDITION | Big Pulpit
  • Selling adversaries into slavery Jay was a regrettably common practice among both the Whites and the Indians of the time. Actually Benet does mention the mistreatment of the Indians in his short story:

    “And who with better right?” said the stranger, with one of his
    terrible smiles. “When the first wrong was done to the first Indian, I
    was there. When the first slaver put out for the Congo, I stood on her
    deck. Am I not in your books and stories and beliefs, from the first
    settlements on? Am I not spoken of, still, in every church in New
    England? ‘Tis true the North claims me for a Southerner, and the South
    for a Northerner, but I am neither. I am merely an honest American
    like yourself–and of the best descent–for, to tell the truth, Mr.
    Webster, though I don’t like to boast of it, my name is older in this
    country than yours.”

    Daniel Webster in his oration to the jury of the damned also deals with wrongs done in the early history of the nation:

    “And he began with the simple things that everybody’s known and
    felt–the freshness of a fine morning when you’re young, and the taste of
    food when you’re hungry, and the new day that’s every day when you’re
    a child. He took them up and he turned them in his hands. They were
    good things for any man. But without freedom, they sickened. And when
    he talked of those enslaved, and the sorrows of slavery, his voice got
    like a big bell. He talked of the early days of America and the men
    who had made those days. It wasn’t a spread-eagle speech, but he made
    you see it. He admitted all the wrong that had ever been done. But he
    showed how, out of the wrong and the right, the suffering and the
    starvations, something new had come. And everybody had played a part
    in it, even the traitors.”

  • fascinating article. Many thanks. I’ll definitely follow the links to the other articles in this series.